thr3ads.net - llvm dev - [LLVMdev] Getting command line options to affect subtarget features [Jan 2013]

If this information is useful, please help other people find it:
Share via:

Bill Schmidt

2013-Jan-31 16:17 UTC

[LLVMdev] Getting command line options to affect subtarget features

On Thu, 2013-01-31 at 09:42 -0600, Hal Finkel wrote:> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Bill Schmidt" <wschmidt at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
> > Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 9:26:15 AM
> > Subject: [LLVMdev] Getting command line options to affect subtarget
features
> > 
> > The problem I'm trying to solve:  Invoking clang on PowerPC with
> > -fno-altivec has no effect.
> > 
> > From what I've been able to piece together, PPC.td specifies
various
> > CPUs and the processor features available on each.  So for example we
> > have:
> > 
> > def FeatureAltivec   :
SubtargetFeature<"altivec","HasAltivec",
> > "true",
> >                                         "Enable Altivec
> >                                         instructions">;
> > 
> > def : Processor<"pwr7", G5Itineraries,
> >                   [DirectivePwr7, FeatureAltivec,
> >                    FeatureMFOCRF, FeatureFSqrt, FeatureSTFIWX,
> >                    FeatureISEL, Feature64Bit /*, Feature64BitRegs
> >                    */]>;
> > 
> > During compilation the subtarget class (such as PPCSubtarget) is
> > instantiated with the strings obtained from -mcpu and -mattr.
> > ParseSubtargetFeatures then uses the -mcpu and -mattr values to
> > determine which features to use for code generation.
> > 
> > What seems problematic is that -mattr is the only way that the static
> > features of the target processor can be overridden.
> > 
> > It seems there must be a way for command-line parameters such as
> > -fno-altivec to be used to override which processor features are
> > exploited.  But I can't see immediately how this should work.  I
> > don't
> > know whether or how the command line flags from Clang are made
> > available
> > to LLVM for inspection.
> > 
> > I'm sure there must be an obvious way to do this, but peeking at
code
> > from other targets hasn't enlightened me.  Any advice for how I
can
> > accomplish this?
> 
> Off of the top of my head...
> 
> Within the current infrastructure, I think that we need to alter the Clang
PowerPC toolchain code (Clang::AddPPCTargetArgs in Tools.cpp) to do something
like this:
> 
> if (Args.hasFlag(options::OPT_fno_altivec, options::OPT_faltivec, true)) {
>   CmdArgs.push_back("-backend-option");
>   CmdArgs.push_back("-mattr=-altivec");
> }
Perfect, Hal, thanks!  That makes good sense.  I'll fix this and also
bring some of the CPU handling more up-to-date (several missing
processors that ought to be in there).

Thanks,
Bill
> 
> Why this not done currently I don't know.
> 
>  -Hal
> 
> > 
> > Thanks!  I appreciate any help.
> > 
> > Bill
> > 
> > --
> > Bill Schmidt, Ph.D.
> > IBM Advance Toolchain for PowerLinux
> > IBM Linux Technology Center
> > wschmidt at us.ibm.com
> > wschmidt at linux.vnet.ibm.com
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > LLVM Developers mailing list
> > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
> > 
>

Bill Schmidt

2013-Jan-31 17:23 UTC

head link

[LLVMdev] Getting command line options to affect subtarget features

On Thu, 2013-01-31 at 10:17 -0600, Bill Schmidt wrote:> 
> On Thu, 2013-01-31 at 09:42 -0600, Hal Finkel wrote:
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Bill Schmidt" <wschmidt at
linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > > To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
> > > Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 9:26:15 AM
> > > Subject: [LLVMdev] Getting command line options to affect
subtarget features
> > > 
> > > The problem I'm trying to solve:  Invoking clang on PowerPC
with
> > > -fno-altivec has no effect.
> > > 
> > > From what I've been able to piece together, PPC.td specifies
various
> > > CPUs and the processor features available on each.  So for
example we
> > > have:
> > > 
> > > def FeatureAltivec   :
SubtargetFeature<"altivec","HasAltivec",
> > > "true",
> > >                                         "Enable Altivec
> > >                                         instructions">;
> > > 
> > > def : Processor<"pwr7", G5Itineraries,
> > >                   [DirectivePwr7, FeatureAltivec,
> > >                    FeatureMFOCRF, FeatureFSqrt, FeatureSTFIWX,
> > >                    FeatureISEL, Feature64Bit /*, Feature64BitRegs
> > >                    */]>;
> > > 
> > > During compilation the subtarget class (such as PPCSubtarget) is
> > > instantiated with the strings obtained from -mcpu and -mattr.
> > > ParseSubtargetFeatures then uses the -mcpu and -mattr values to
> > > determine which features to use for code generation.
> > > 
> > > What seems problematic is that -mattr is the only way that the
static
> > > features of the target processor can be overridden.
> > > 
> > > It seems there must be a way for command-line parameters such as
> > > -fno-altivec to be used to override which processor features are
> > > exploited.  But I can't see immediately how this should work.
I
> > > don't
> > > know whether or how the command line flags from Clang are made
> > > available
> > > to LLVM for inspection.
> > > 
> > > I'm sure there must be an obvious way to do this, but peeking
at code
> > > from other targets hasn't enlightened me.  Any advice for how
I can
> > > accomplish this?
> > 
> > Off of the top of my head...
> > 
> > Within the current infrastructure, I think that we need to alter the
Clang PowerPC toolchain code (Clang::AddPPCTargetArgs in Tools.cpp) to do
something like this:
> > 
> > if (Args.hasFlag(options::OPT_fno_altivec, options::OPT_faltivec,
true)) {
> >   CmdArgs.push_back("-backend-option");
> >   CmdArgs.push_back("-mattr=-altivec");
> > }
> 
> Perfect, Hal, thanks!  That makes good sense.  I'll fix this and also
> bring some of the CPU handling more up-to-date (several missing
> processors that ought to be in there).
Well, I spoke too soon.  I tried this and received the following
objection:

~/src/llvm> $LLVM_INSTALL/bin/clang vectest.c -S -O3 -o vectest.s
-fno-altivec
clang: Unknown command line argument '-mattr=-altivec'.  Try: 'clang
-help'
clang: Did you mean '-mxgot=-altivec'?
~/src/llvm> 

Yet I can do the following:

~/src/llvm> $LLVM_INSTALL/bin/llc -O3 -mattr=-altivec vectest.ll
~/src/llvm> 

The general mechanism seems valid since code like this exists:

  if (Args.hasFlag(options::OPT_mstackrealign, options::OPT_mno_stackrealign,
                   false)) {
    CmdArgs.push_back("-backend-option");
    CmdArgs.push_back("-force-align-stack");
  }

But it doesn't like -mattr.  Anyone have thoughts why?

Thanks,
Bill
> 
> Thanks,
> Bill
> 
> > 
> > Why this not done currently I don't know.
> > 
> >  -Hal
> > 
> > > 
> > > Thanks!  I appreciate any help.
> > > 
> > > Bill
> > > 
> > > --
> > > Bill Schmidt, Ph.D.
> > > IBM Advance Toolchain for PowerLinux
> > > IBM Linux Technology Center
> > > wschmidt at us.ibm.com
> > > wschmidt at linux.vnet.ibm.com
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > LLVM Developers mailing list
> > > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> > > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
> > > 
> >

Bill Schmidt

2013-Jan-31 17:29 UTC

head link

[LLVMdev] Getting command line options to affect subtarget features

On Thu, 2013-01-31 at 11:23 -0600, Bill Schmidt wrote:> On Thu, 2013-01-31 at 10:17 -0600, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, 2013-01-31 at 09:42 -0600, Hal Finkel wrote:
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Bill Schmidt" <wschmidt at
linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > > > To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
> > > > Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 9:26:15 AM
> > > > Subject: [LLVMdev] Getting command line options to affect
subtarget features
> > > > 
> > > > The problem I'm trying to solve:  Invoking clang on
PowerPC with
> > > > -fno-altivec has no effect.
> > > > 
> > > > From what I've been able to piece together, PPC.td
specifies various
> > > > CPUs and the processor features available on each.  So for
example we
> > > > have:
> > > > 
> > > > def FeatureAltivec   :
SubtargetFeature<"altivec","HasAltivec",
> > > > "true",
> > > >                                         "Enable Altivec
> > > >                                        
instructions">;
> > > > 
> > > > def : Processor<"pwr7", G5Itineraries,
> > > >                   [DirectivePwr7, FeatureAltivec,
> > > >                    FeatureMFOCRF, FeatureFSqrt,
FeatureSTFIWX,
> > > >                    FeatureISEL, Feature64Bit /*,
Feature64BitRegs
> > > >                    */]>;
> > > > 
> > > > During compilation the subtarget class (such as
PPCSubtarget) is
> > > > instantiated with the strings obtained from -mcpu and
-mattr.
> > > > ParseSubtargetFeatures then uses the -mcpu and -mattr values
to
> > > > determine which features to use for code generation.
> > > > 
> > > > What seems problematic is that -mattr is the only way that
the static
> > > > features of the target processor can be overridden.
> > > > 
> > > > It seems there must be a way for command-line parameters
such as
> > > > -fno-altivec to be used to override which processor features
are
> > > > exploited.  But I can't see immediately how this should
work.  I
> > > > don't
> > > > know whether or how the command line flags from Clang are
made
> > > > available
> > > > to LLVM for inspection.
> > > > 
> > > > I'm sure there must be an obvious way to do this, but
peeking at code
> > > > from other targets hasn't enlightened me.  Any advice
for how I can
> > > > accomplish this?
> > > 
> > > Off of the top of my head...
> > > 
> > > Within the current infrastructure, I think that we need to alter
the Clang PowerPC toolchain code (Clang::AddPPCTargetArgs in Tools.cpp) to do
something like this:
> > > 
> > > if (Args.hasFlag(options::OPT_fno_altivec, options::OPT_faltivec,
true)) {
> > >   CmdArgs.push_back("-backend-option");
> > >   CmdArgs.push_back("-mattr=-altivec");
> > > }
> > 
> > Perfect, Hal, thanks!  That makes good sense.  I'll fix this and
also
> > bring some of the CPU handling more up-to-date (several missing
> > processors that ought to be in there).
> 
> Well, I spoke too soon.  I tried this and received the following
> objection:
> 
> ~/src/llvm> $LLVM_INSTALL/bin/clang vectest.c -S -O3 -o vectest.s
-fno-altivec
> clang: Unknown command line argument '-mattr=-altivec'.  Try:
'clang -help'
> clang: Did you mean '-mxgot=-altivec'?
> ~/src/llvm> 
> 
> Yet I can do the following:
> 
> ~/src/llvm> $LLVM_INSTALL/bin/llc -O3 -mattr=-altivec vectest.ll
> ~/src/llvm> 
> 
> The general mechanism seems valid since code like this exists:
> 
>   if (Args.hasFlag(options::OPT_mstackrealign,
options::OPT_mno_stackrealign,
>                    false)) {
>     CmdArgs.push_back("-backend-option");
>     CmdArgs.push_back("-force-align-stack");
>   }
> 
> But it doesn't like -mattr.  Anyone have thoughts why?
I found some ideas to try in
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/2011-September/017087.html.
Perhaps I can try pushing these tokens onto CmdArgs and then enable
altivec as a feature in PPCTargetInfo::setFeatureEnabled():

-Xclang -target-feature -Xclang -altivec

I'll give that a whirl and see what happens.

Bill
> 
> Thanks,
> Bill
> 
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Bill
> > 
> > > 
> > > Why this not done currently I don't know.
> > > 
> > >  -Hal
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks!  I appreciate any help.
> > > > 
> > > > Bill
> > > > 
> > > > --
> > > > Bill Schmidt, Ph.D.
> > > > IBM Advance Toolchain for PowerLinux
> > > > IBM Linux Technology Center
> > > > wschmidt at us.ibm.com
> > > > wschmidt at linux.vnet.ibm.com
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > LLVM Developers mailing list
> > > > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> > > > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
> > > > 
> > >

Seemingly Similar Threads

Search for more seemingly similar threads

llvm dev - Jan 2013 - [LLVMdev] Getting command line options to affect subtarget features

[LLVMdev] Getting command line options to affect subtarget features

[LLVMdev] Getting command line options to affect subtarget features

[LLVMdev] Getting command line options to affect subtarget features

Seemingly Similar Threads