search for: cmdarg

Hello, I have tried a lot fix this error but am not able to can you please find me a solution am trying to compile the SAFECode in Cygwin Environment to work for windows. used make -j4 command to make the files in cygwin i have got this error make[5]: Leaving directory '/home/uidr7475/Work/LLVM_OBJ/projects/safecode/tools/clang/include' /usr/bin/cp: cannot stat

...t; > > Within the current infrastructure, I think that we need to alter the Clang PowerPC toolchain code (Clang::AddPPCTargetArgs in Tools.cpp) to do something like this: > > > > > > if (Args.hasFlag(options::OPT_fno_altivec, options::OPT_faltivec, true)) { > > > CmdArgs.push_back("-backend-option"); > > > CmdArgs.push_back("-mattr=-altivec"); > > > } > > > > Perfect, Hal, thanks! That makes good sense. I'll fix this and also > > bring some of the CPU handling more up-to-date (several missing > &g...

...t; Off of the top of my head... > > Within the current infrastructure, I think that we need to alter the Clang PowerPC toolchain code (Clang::AddPPCTargetArgs in Tools.cpp) to do something like this: > > if (Args.hasFlag(options::OPT_fno_altivec, options::OPT_faltivec, true)) { > CmdArgs.push_back("-backend-option"); > CmdArgs.push_back("-mattr=-altivec"); > } Perfect, Hal, thanks! That makes good sense. I'll fix this and also bring some of the CPU handling more up-to-date (several missing processors that ought to be in there). Thanks, Bill &gt...

...ead... > > > > Within the current infrastructure, I think that we need to alter the Clang PowerPC toolchain code (Clang::AddPPCTargetArgs in Tools.cpp) to do something like this: > > > > if (Args.hasFlag(options::OPT_fno_altivec, options::OPT_faltivec, true)) { > > CmdArgs.push_back("-backend-option"); > > CmdArgs.push_back("-mattr=-altivec"); > > } > > Perfect, Hal, thanks! That makes good sense. I'll fix this and also > bring some of the CPU handling more up-to-date (several missing > processors that ought to be...

...thin the current infrastructure, I think that we need to alter the Clang PowerPC toolchain code (Clang::AddPPCTargetArgs in Tools.cpp) to do something like this: > > > > > > > > if (Args.hasFlag(options::OPT_fno_altivec, options::OPT_faltivec, true)) { > > > > CmdArgs.push_back("-backend-option"); > > > > CmdArgs.push_back("-mattr=-altivec"); > > > > } > > > > > > Perfect, Hal, thanks! That makes good sense. I'll fix this and also > > > bring some of the CPU handling more up-to-date...

...can > accomplish this? Off of the top of my head... Within the current infrastructure, I think that we need to alter the Clang PowerPC toolchain code (Clang::AddPPCTargetArgs in Tools.cpp) to do something like this: if (Args.hasFlag(options::OPT_fno_altivec, options::OPT_faltivec, true)) { CmdArgs.push_back("-backend-option"); CmdArgs.push_back("-mattr=-altivec"); } Why this not done currently I don't know. -Hal > > Thanks! I appreciate any help. > > Bill > > -- > Bill Schmidt, Ph.D. > IBM Advance Toolchain for PowerLinux > IBM Li...

The problem I'm trying to solve: Invoking clang on PowerPC with -fno-altivec has no effect. >From what I've been able to piece together, PPC.td specifies various CPUs and the processor features available on each. So for example we have: def FeatureAltivec : SubtargetFeature<"altivec","HasAltivec", "true",

...NSTALL_PREFIX #include "clang/Driver/Compilation.h" #include "clang/Driver/Driver.h" diff --git a/lib/Driver/Tools.cpp b/lib/Driver/Tools.cpp index d11fa4e..7f24995 100644 --- a/lib/Driver/Tools.cpp +++ b/lib/Driver/Tools.cpp @@ -2172,6 +2172,29 @@ static void addProfileRT( CmdArgs.push_back(Args.MakeArgString(LibProfile)); } +static void addSafeStackRT( + const ToolChain &TC, const ArgList &Args, ArgStringList &CmdArgs) { + if (!Args.hasFlag(options::OPT_fsafe_stack, + options::OPT_fno_safe_stack, false)) + return; + + const char *L...

...R_HOME)/share instead (seems to work OK)? I notice the following in /src/gnuwin32/front-ends/rcmdfn.c (from R-alpha 2008-04-06), which would suggest that the intention was that R_SHARE_DIR should be defined... (and I assume it would propagate to to be available in a Makefile.) int rcmdfn (int cmdarg, int argc, char **argv) { /* tasks: find R_HOME, set as env variable set R_SHARE_DIR as env variable set PATH to include R_HOME\bin set PERL5LIB to %R_SHARE_DIR%/perl;%Perl5LIB% set TEXINPUTS to %R_SHARE_DIR%/texmf;%TEXINPUTS% set HOME if unset...

Dear LLVMers, I am trying to measure the performance overhead (if any) of the canaries that clang inserts in the code. I would like to do this automatically, using the LLVM test infra-structure. However, I am not sure if that is possible. Could someone tell me which flags in the TEST.nightly.Makefile script, (or any other script) I must change to have this done? Usually I insert canaries with

.../ld64.so.1"; + else if (ToolChain.getTriple().getEnvironment() == llvm::Triple::GNUX32) + return "/libx32/ld-linux-x32.so.2"; else return "/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2"; } @@ -6125,8 +6127,12 @@ } else if (ToolChain.getArch() == llvm::Triple::systemz) CmdArgs.push_back("elf64_s390"); - else - CmdArgs.push_back("elf_x86_64"); + else if (ToolChain.getArch() == llvm::Triple::x86_64) + CmdArgs.push_back(ToolChain.getTriple().getEnvironment() == + llvm::Triple::GNUX32 + ? "elf32_x86_...

On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 12:29 +0400, Alexey Samsonov wrote: > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Steven Newbury <steve at snewbury.org.uk>wrote: > > > On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 11:50 +0400, Alexey Samsonov wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Steven Newbury <steve at snewbury.org.uk > > >wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, 2013-08-22 at

Hi, This is a follow-up to the problem reported here: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2010-September/058460.html After I updated R-2.12 to 2010-09-13 r52905 on the Bioc build system, some of the packages that have a Makefile in <pkg>/inst/doc still don't build on Windows. For example, 'R\bin\R.exe CMD build adSplit' gives: * checking for file

.../Tools.cpp @@ -3594,6 +3594,11 @@ void Clang::ConstructJob(Compilation &C, const JobAction &JA, D.Diag(diag::err_drv_argument_not_allowed_with) << "-fomit-frame-pointer" << A->getAsString(Args); + if (Args.hasArg(options::OPT_fauto_profile)) { + CmdArgs.push_back("-auto-profile"); + } + // Claim some arguments which clang supports automatically. // -fpch-preprocess is used with gcc to add a special marker in the output to

Hi, I'm working on bringing up complete coverage for a Gentoo x32 "desktop" system. I've been cooking up quite a few patches for various packages to push upstream, but right now, the biggest blocker is the lack of support for building with/codegen targeting x32 in llvm/clang. Since the x32 patches were sent last year, I see support code has landed in LLVM, and basic handling of

.../ld64.so.1"; + else if (ToolChain.getTriple().getEnvironment() == llvm::Triple::GNUX32) + return "/libx32/ld-linux-x32.so.2"; else return "/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2"; } @@ -6125,8 +6127,12 @@ } else if (ToolChain.getArch() == llvm::Triple::systemz) CmdArgs.push_back("elf64_s390"); - else - CmdArgs.push_back("elf_x86_64"); + else if (ToolChain.getArch() == llvm::Triple::x86_64) + CmdArgs.push_back(ToolChain.getTriple().getEnvironment() == + llvm::Triple::GNUX32 + ? "elf32_x86_...

Hi everybody, As you know, Cuda/NVPTX target has very limited support of the debug info in Clang/LLVM. Currently, LLVM supports only emission of the line numbers debug info. This is caused by limitations of the Cuda/NVPTX codegen. Clang/LLVM translates the source code to LLVM IR, which is then lowered to PTX (parallel thread execution) intermediate file. This PTX file represents special kind of

looks like experimental/work in progress support: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62731 On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 10:39 PM kamlesh kumar via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 11:06 AM kamlesh kumar <kamleshbhalui at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Devs, >> going by this link https://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#floatenv >>

....ll --> clang: warning: unknow platform, assuming -mfloat-abi=soft --> error: error reading 'soft' In order to get rid of this error, I commented clang/lib/Driver/Tools.cpp:L680. I wonder whether there are any significant the side-effects from commenting "CmdArgs.push_back("soft");" Also, can anyone explain the significance of the option -ccc-host-triple sparc-unknown-linux? Thanks, Gangryung -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/201107...

...("9Feb1960", "%d%b%Y") [1] "NA" Stephen p.s. I failed to send this using bug.report(); on DEC OSF/1, "mailx" does not recognise the -c switch for setting the carbon copy (CC) field, causing an error. One solution might be to remove the -c argument from the cmdarg in bug.rerport(), or put a "~c joe@bloggs.com" directive at the end of the file to set the CC field. --please do not edit the information below-- Version: platform = alphaev56-dec-osf4.0f arch = alphaev56 os = osf4.0f system = alphaev56, osf4.0f status = major = 1 minor = 2.0...