Frank Winter via llvm-dev
2018-Jun-28 19:40 UTC
[llvm-dev] Since MCJIT I can't get libm functions to work
I am upgrading our JIT application to use LLVM 6.0.0, and with this transition I am making the move to use the new MCJIT facility. A problem I am encountering is that the math functions from libm are not resolved/found. I am using the lambda resolver from the KaleidoscopeJIT class which first searches the present modules and, if that is unsuccessful, continues the search in the whole process space. The generated modules would declare external functions like declare float @cosf(float) and would call it like: %17 = call float @cosf(float %16) The datalayout is set to target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128" The code snippet that adds the module is pretty much from the JIT tutorial: auto Resolver = llvm::orc::createLambdaResolver( [&](const std::string &Name) { if (auto Sym = CompileLayer.findSymbol(Name, false)) return Sym; return llvm::JITSymbol(nullptr); }, [](const std::string &Name) { if (auto SymAddr llvm::RTDyldMemoryManager::getSymbolAddressInProcess(Name)) return llvm::JITSymbol(SymAddr, llvm::JITSymbolFlags::Exported); return llvm::JITSymbol(nullptr); }); cantFail(CompileLayer.addModule(std::move(M), std::move(Resolver))); When running the program I receive the following error: LLVM ERROR: Program used external function 'cosf' which could not be resolved! This is on an Intel i7 CPU with LLVM targets configured as "X86". Adding the '-lm' and '-ldl' option to the linker command that links the final program doesn't help. (I even called the 'cosf' function by hand in the host code to make sure it is mapped - didn't change the behavior of the MCJIT resolver.) Any ideas? Best wishes, Frank
Lang Hames via llvm-dev
2018-Jun-28 20:35 UTC
[llvm-dev] Since MCJIT I can't get libm functions to work
Hi Frank, This is on Linux, right? If so, you will need to pass --export-dynamic to ld to export symbols from the main binary. For example, given source file foo.c: #include <stdio.h> #include <dlfcn.h> void bar() {} int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { printf("bar is %p\n", dlsym(RTLD_DEFAULT, "bar")); return 0; } You will see: $ clang -O3 -D_GNU_SOURCE=1 -o foo foo.c -ldl $ ./foo bar is (nil) $ clang -O3 -D_GNU_SOURCE=1 -Wl,--export-dynamic -o foo foo.c -ldl $ ./foo bar is 0x400820 Hope this helps! Cheers, Lang. On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 12:40 PM Frank Winter via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:> I am upgrading our JIT application to use LLVM 6.0.0, and with this > transition I am making the move to use the new MCJIT facility. > > A problem I am encountering is that the math functions from libm are not > resolved/found. I am using the lambda resolver from the KaleidoscopeJIT > class which first searches the present modules and, if that is > unsuccessful, continues the search in the whole process space. > > The generated modules would declare external functions like > > declare float @cosf(float) > > and would call it like: > > %17 = call float @cosf(float %16) > > The datalayout is set to > > target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128" > > The code snippet that adds the module is pretty much from the JIT tutorial: > > auto Resolver = llvm::orc::createLambdaResolver( > [&](const std::string &Name) { > if (auto Sym > CompileLayer.findSymbol(Name, false)) > return Sym; > return llvm::JITSymbol(nullptr); > }, > [](const std::string &Name) { > if (auto SymAddr > llvm::RTDyldMemoryManager::getSymbolAddressInProcess(Name)) > return llvm::JITSymbol(SymAddr, > llvm::JITSymbolFlags::Exported); > return llvm::JITSymbol(nullptr); > }); > > cantFail(CompileLayer.addModule(std::move(M), > std::move(Resolver))); > > When running the program I receive the following error: > > LLVM ERROR: Program used external function 'cosf' which could not be > resolved! > > This is on an Intel i7 CPU with LLVM targets configured as "X86". > > Adding the '-lm' and '-ldl' option to the linker command that links the > final program doesn't help. (I even called the 'cosf' function by hand > in the host code to make sure it is mapped - didn't change the behavior > of the MCJIT resolver.) > > Any ideas? > > > Best wishes, > > Frank > > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180628/f89f3a93/attachment.html>
Alex Denisov via llvm-dev
2018-Jun-28 20:38 UTC
[llvm-dev] Since MCJIT I can't get libm functions to work
Hi Frank, If I am not mistaken it doesn't look in the whole process space by default. Please, try loading all the symbols explicitly: sys::DynamicLibrary::LoadLibraryPermanently(nullptr); If it doesn't help, then you may try compiling your host program with -rdynamic, otherwise dlsym may not see all the symbols. At least it was the case for me on Linux. I hope it helps. Cheers, Alex.> On 28. Jun 2018, at 21:40, Frank Winter via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I am upgrading our JIT application to use LLVM 6.0.0, and with this transition I am making the move to use the new MCJIT facility. > > A problem I am encountering is that the math functions from libm are not resolved/found. I am using the lambda resolver from the KaleidoscopeJIT class which first searches the present modules and, if that is unsuccessful, continues the search in the whole process space. > > The generated modules would declare external functions like > > declare float @cosf(float) > > and would call it like: > > %17 = call float @cosf(float %16) > > The datalayout is set to > > target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128" > > The code snippet that adds the module is pretty much from the JIT tutorial: > > auto Resolver = llvm::orc::createLambdaResolver( > [&](const std::string &Name) { > if (auto Sym = CompileLayer.findSymbol(Name, false)) > return Sym; > return llvm::JITSymbol(nullptr); > }, > [](const std::string &Name) { > if (auto SymAddr > llvm::RTDyldMemoryManager::getSymbolAddressInProcess(Name)) > return llvm::JITSymbol(SymAddr, llvm::JITSymbolFlags::Exported); > return llvm::JITSymbol(nullptr); > }); > > cantFail(CompileLayer.addModule(std::move(M), > std::move(Resolver))); > > When running the program I receive the following error: > > LLVM ERROR: Program used external function 'cosf' which could not be resolved! > > This is on an Intel i7 CPU with LLVM targets configured as "X86". > > Adding the '-lm' and '-ldl' option to the linker command that links the final program doesn't help. (I even called the 'cosf' function by hand in the host code to make sure it is mapped - didn't change the behavior of the MCJIT resolver.) > > Any ideas? > > > Best wishes, > > Frank > > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 488 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180628/4f5f9f87/attachment.sig>
Frank Winter via llvm-dev
2018-Jun-28 20:49 UTC
[llvm-dev] Since MCJIT I can't get libm functions to work
Hi Alex, loading the symbols explicitly helped. With this the build process doesn't need any additional linker flags. Very nice. Thanks, Frank On 06/28/2018 04:38 PM, Alex Denisov wrote:> Hi Frank, > > If I am not mistaken it doesn't look in the whole process space by default. > Please, try loading all the symbols explicitly: > > sys::DynamicLibrary::LoadLibraryPermanently(nullptr); > > If it doesn't help, then you may try compiling your host program with -rdynamic, otherwise dlsym may not see all the symbols. At least it was the case for me on Linux. > > I hope it helps. > > Cheers, > Alex. > >> On 28. Jun 2018, at 21:40, Frank Winter via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> I am upgrading our JIT application to use LLVM 6.0.0, and with this transition I am making the move to use the new MCJIT facility. >> >> A problem I am encountering is that the math functions from libm are not resolved/found. I am using the lambda resolver from the KaleidoscopeJIT class which first searches the present modules and, if that is unsuccessful, continues the search in the whole process space. >> >> The generated modules would declare external functions like >> >> declare float @cosf(float) >> >> and would call it like: >> >> %17 = call float @cosf(float %16) >> >> The datalayout is set to >> >> target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128" >> >> The code snippet that adds the module is pretty much from the JIT tutorial: >> >> auto Resolver = llvm::orc::createLambdaResolver( >> [&](const std::string &Name) { >> if (auto Sym = CompileLayer.findSymbol(Name, false)) >> return Sym; >> return llvm::JITSymbol(nullptr); >> }, >> [](const std::string &Name) { >> if (auto SymAddr >> llvm::RTDyldMemoryManager::getSymbolAddressInProcess(Name)) >> return llvm::JITSymbol(SymAddr, llvm::JITSymbolFlags::Exported); >> return llvm::JITSymbol(nullptr); >> }); >> >> cantFail(CompileLayer.addModule(std::move(M), >> std::move(Resolver))); >> >> When running the program I receive the following error: >> >> LLVM ERROR: Program used external function 'cosf' which could not be resolved! >> >> This is on an Intel i7 CPU with LLVM targets configured as "X86". >> >> Adding the '-lm' and '-ldl' option to the linker command that links the final program doesn't help. (I even called the 'cosf' function by hand in the host code to make sure it is mapped - didn't change the behavior of the MCJIT resolver.) >> >> Any ideas? >> >> >> Best wishes, >> >> Frank >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> LLVM Developers mailing list >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org >> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
Reasonably Related Threads
- Since MCJIT I can't get libm functions to work
- Possible stack corruption during call to JITSymbol::getAddress()
- [cfe-dev] JIT doens't resolve address - Resolve obj-Addresses?
- Possible stack corruption during call to JITSymbol::getAddress()
- Possible stack corruption during call to JITSymbol::getAddress()