llvm dev - Aug 2016 - [Release-testers] [3.9 Release] Release Candidate 2 has been tagged

When I tested rc1 I found that some of the test suite wouldn't build on
SLES11.3 as a consequence of changes to the tests.  At least some of the
msan tests have been changed leverage features of glibc newer than is
available on this platform.

I asked about a minimum-required glibc but didn't hear back.  Is the
minimum required glibc for 3.9 different from 3.8?

When I tried rc1 on sles11.3 x86_64, msan's getrlimit test fails to build
for lack of prlimit(). SLES11.3 has glibc 2.11.3. Is there a minimum
required glibc? I think this test implementation previously used
getrlimit(), which is present on glibc2.11.3.

On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Diana Picus via Release-testers <
release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> All good on AArch64 - we've uploaded the binaries.
>
> Regards,
> Diana
>
> On 19 August 2016 at 04:51, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers
> <release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> > Dear testers,
> >
> > 3.9.0-rc2 was just tagged from the 3.9 branch at r279183.
> >
> > This is a release candidate in the very real sense that if nothing new
> > comes up, this is be what the final release looks like. There are
> > currently no open release blockers, and no patches in my merge-queue.
> >
> > Please build, test, and upload binaries to the sftp. Let me know how
> > everything goes.
> >
> > From this point, the branch is only open for fixing critical problems
> > (bad enough to warrant another test cycle) and release notes.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Hans
> > _______________________________________________
> > Release-testers mailing list
> > Release-testers at lists.llvm.org
> > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-testers
> _______________________________________________
> Release-testers mailing list
> Release-testers at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-testers
>


-- 
-Brian
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160819/3f58a153/attachment.html>

+Evgenii for msan.

I suspect the community simply doesn't keep track of what glibc
version is required :-/

On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Brian Cain <brian.cain at gmail.com>
wrote:
> When I tested rc1 I found that some of the test suite wouldn't build on
> SLES11.3 as a consequence of changes to the tests.  At least some of the
> msan tests have been changed leverage features of glibc newer than is
> available on this platform.
>
> I asked about a minimum-required glibc but didn't hear back.  Is the
minimum
> required glibc for 3.9 different from 3.8?
>
> When I tried rc1 on sles11.3 x86_64, msan's getrlimit test fails to
build
> for lack of prlimit(). SLES11.3 has glibc 2.11.3. Is there a minimum
> required glibc? I think this test implementation previously used
> getrlimit(), which is present on glibc2.11.3.
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Diana Picus via Release-testers
> <release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> All good on AArch64 - we've uploaded the binaries.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Diana
>>
>> On 19 August 2016 at 04:51, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers
>> <release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>> > Dear testers,
>> >
>> > 3.9.0-rc2 was just tagged from the 3.9 branch at r279183.
>> >
>> > This is a release candidate in the very real sense that if nothing
new
>> > comes up, this is be what the final release looks like. There are
>> > currently no open release blockers, and no patches in my
merge-queue.
>> >
>> > Please build, test, and upload binaries to the sftp. Let me know
how
>> > everything goes.
>> >
>> > From this point, the branch is only open for fixing critical
problems
>> > (bad enough to warrant another test cycle) and release notes.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Hans
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Release-testers mailing list
>> > Release-testers at lists.llvm.org
>> > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-testers
>> _______________________________________________
>> Release-testers mailing list
>> Release-testers at lists.llvm.org
>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-testers
>
>
>
>
> --
> -Brian

It's a test for the new interceptor for prlimit.
It could be disabled with __GLIBC_PREREQ for 2.13+.

On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 5:16 PM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org>
wrote:
> +Evgenii for msan.
>
> I suspect the community simply doesn't keep track of what glibc
> version is required :-/
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Brian Cain <brian.cain at gmail.com>
wrote:
>> When I tested rc1 I found that some of the test suite wouldn't
build on
>> SLES11.3 as a consequence of changes to the tests.  At least some of
the
>> msan tests have been changed leverage features of glibc newer than is
>> available on this platform.
>>
>> I asked about a minimum-required glibc but didn't hear back.  Is
the minimum
>> required glibc for 3.9 different from 3.8?
>>
>> When I tried rc1 on sles11.3 x86_64, msan's getrlimit test fails to
build
>> for lack of prlimit(). SLES11.3 has glibc 2.11.3. Is there a minimum
>> required glibc? I think this test implementation previously used
>> getrlimit(), which is present on glibc2.11.3.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Diana Picus via Release-testers
>> <release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> All good on AArch64 - we've uploaded the binaries.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Diana
>>>
>>> On 19 August 2016 at 04:51, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers
>>> <release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>> > Dear testers,
>>> >
>>> > 3.9.0-rc2 was just tagged from the 3.9 branch at r279183.
>>> >
>>> > This is a release candidate in the very real sense that if
nothing new
>>> > comes up, this is be what the final release looks like. There
are
>>> > currently no open release blockers, and no patches in my
merge-queue.
>>> >
>>> > Please build, test, and upload binaries to the sftp. Let me
know how
>>> > everything goes.
>>> >
>>> > From this point, the branch is only open for fixing critical
problems
>>> > (bad enough to warrant another test cycle) and release notes.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> > Hans
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Release-testers mailing list
>>> > Release-testers at lists.llvm.org
>>> > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-testers
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Release-testers mailing list
>>> Release-testers at lists.llvm.org
>>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-testers
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> -Brian