llvm dev - Feb 2016 - Writing an LLVM Pass that depends on mem2reg

Hi,
I read your post in LLVM forum. I want to use getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage
&AU) to get MachineLoopInfo. I have used this on my passes before but, this
time I am trying to get this information in ScheduleDAGRRList scheduler class.
There is no runonmachinefunction function. Do you know how I can implement this?
Regards,
Fateme
I will appreciate it you can help me with this problem.
<quote author='Mehdi Amini via llvm-dev'>
Hello,

I am used to specifying dependence on other LLVM passes in the
`getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &)` method of my pass. However, it
doesn't
seem that there is a header file that exposes the `mem2reg` pass - it is
implemented in `Mem2Reg.cpp` as a wrapper.

Is there an easy way to reuse this pass, or should I, in essence, duplicate
`Mem2Reg.cpp` in my project?

Cheers,
 - Stan

_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev

</quote>
Quoted from: 
http://llvm.1065342.n5.nabble.com/llvm-dev-Writing-an-LLVM-Pass-that-depends-on-mem2reg-tp91085.html


_____________________________________
Sent from http://llvm.1065342.n5.nabble.com

Hi,
> On Feb 11, 2016, at 10:40 AM, via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at
lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> I read your post in LLVM forum. I want to use
getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) to get MachineLoopInfo. I have used this
on my passes before but, this time I am trying to get this information in
ScheduleDAGRRList scheduler class. There is no runonmachinefunction function. Do
you know how I can implement this?
Short answer: you can't, unless I am missing something really obvious.

I'm not sure it even makes sense since this is invoke *during instruction
selection*. It means that all the machine basic blocks haven't been created
yet. SelectionDAG operates on a single basic block only.
You should step back and think about what you're really trying to achieve
here.
If you provide more information on what you're trying to do and why you need
this, we may be able to better help to find a solution.

-- 
Mehdi
> Regards,
> Fateme
> I will appreciate it you can help me with this problem.
> <quote author='Mehdi Amini via llvm-dev'>
> Hello,
> 
> I am used to specifying dependence on other LLVM passes in the
> `getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &)` method of my pass. However, it
doesn't
> seem that there is a header file that exposes the `mem2reg` pass - it is
> implemented in `Mem2Reg.cpp` as a wrapper.
> 
> Is there an easy way to reuse this pass, or should I, in essence, duplicate
> `Mem2Reg.cpp` in my project?
> 
> Cheers,
> - Stan
> 
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
> 
> </quote>
> Quoted from: 
>
http://llvm.1065342.n5.nabble.com/llvm-dev-Writing-an-LLVM-Pass-that-depends-on-mem2reg-tp91085.html
> 
> 
> _____________________________________
> Sent from http://llvm.1065342.n5.nabble.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev

I thinkt MachineLoopInfo requires the program to be in MI representation which
it isn't yet when the selection DAG schedulers run. You may be able to hack
around that by using the IR level loopinfo and trying to associate that
information with the machine basic blocks (though that is probably tricky as
well as I think expansion of pseudos may have created additional blocks which
are not necessarily present in the IR).

In any way the selection DAG schedulers are usually not the place where you want
to do advanced scheduling. The long term plan for the selection dag schedulers
is to make them as simple as a reverse postorder walk on the selection DAG (we
are not quite there yet) or not require them at all anymore with the upcoming
GlobalISel. Scheduling for machine specifics is done with the MachineScheduler
infrastructure, have you looked at implementing a pre-ra or post-ra
MachineScheduler instead of creating a new ScheduleDAG scheduler?

- Matthias
> On Feb 11, 2016, at 10:40 AM, via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at
lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> I read your post in LLVM forum. I want to use
getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) to get MachineLoopInfo. I have used this
on my passes before but, this time I am trying to get this information in
ScheduleDAGRRList scheduler class. There is no runonmachinefunction function. Do
you know how I can implement this?
> Regards,
> Fateme
> I will appreciate it you can help me with this problem.
> <quote author='Mehdi Amini via llvm-dev'>
> Hello,
> 
> I am used to specifying dependence on other LLVM passes in the
> `getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &)` method of my pass. However, it
doesn't
> seem that there is a header file that exposes the `mem2reg` pass - it is
> implemented in `Mem2Reg.cpp` as a wrapper.
> 
> Is there an easy way to reuse this pass, or should I, in essence, duplicate
> `Mem2Reg.cpp` in my project?
> 
> Cheers,
> - Stan
> 
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
> 
> </quote>
> Quoted from: 
>
http://llvm.1065342.n5.nabble.com/llvm-dev-Writing-an-LLVM-Pass-that-depends-on-mem2reg-tp91085.html
> 
> 
> _____________________________________
> Sent from http://llvm.1065342.n5.nabble.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev

Thank you for your replies. So I guess, the only way to implement this is
to create a port-ra MachineScheduler pass. Basically, for my pass I just
want to take the result of LLVM scheduler (Sequence vector) and do some
modification on the scheduling order of instructions for blocks inside the
loops. Therefore, in addition to MachineLoopInfo, I need the sequence of
scheduling Units and their relations. Could you please give me a start
point on how to include Sunits information in my pass. Is this information
from the scheduler still available?
Regards,
Fami

On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 2:59 PM, Matthias Braun <mbraun at apple.com>
wrote:
> I thinkt MachineLoopInfo requires the program to be in MI representation
> which it isn't yet when the selection DAG schedulers run. You may be
able
> to hack around that by using the IR level loopinfo and trying to associate
> that information with the machine basic blocks (though that is probably
> tricky as well as I think expansion of pseudos may have created additional
> blocks which are not necessarily present in the IR).
>
> In any way the selection DAG schedulers are usually not the place where
> you want to do advanced scheduling. The long term plan for the selection
> dag schedulers is to make them as simple as a reverse postorder walk on the
> selection DAG (we are not quite there yet) or not require them at all
> anymore with the upcoming GlobalISel. Scheduling for machine specifics is
> done with the MachineScheduler infrastructure, have you looked at
> implementing a pre-ra or post-ra MachineScheduler instead of creating a new
> ScheduleDAG scheduler?
>
> - Matthias
>
> > On Feb 11, 2016, at 10:40 AM, via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at
lists.llvm.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > I read your post in LLVM forum. I want to use
> getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) to get MachineLoopInfo. I have used
> this on my passes before but, this time I am trying to get this information
> in ScheduleDAGRRList scheduler class. There is no runonmachinefunction
> function. Do you know how I can implement this?
> > Regards,
> > Fateme
> > I will appreciate it you can help me with this problem.
> > <quote author='Mehdi Amini via llvm-dev'>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am used to specifying dependence on other LLVM passes in the
> > `getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &)` method of my pass. However, it
> doesn't
> > seem that there is a header file that exposes the `mem2reg` pass - it
is
> > implemented in `Mem2Reg.cpp` as a wrapper.
> >
> > Is there an easy way to reuse this pass, or should I, in essence,
> duplicate
> > `Mem2Reg.cpp` in my project?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > - Stan
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > LLVM Developers mailing list
> > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
> >
> > </quote>
> > Quoted from:
> >
>
http://llvm.1065342.n5.nabble.com/llvm-dev-Writing-an-LLVM-Pass-that-depends-on-mem2reg-tp91085.html
> >
> >
> > _____________________________________
> > Sent from http://llvm.1065342.n5.nabble.com
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > LLVM Developers mailing list
> > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160215/08942477/attachment-0001.html>