Davide Italiano via llvm-dev
2015-Aug-26 14:07 UTC
[llvm-dev] buildbot failure in LLVM on clang-native-arm-cortex-a9
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 7:04 AM, <llvm.buildmaster at lab.llvm.org> wrote:> The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder clang-native-arm-cortex-a9 while building llvm. > Full details are available at: > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-native-arm-cortex-a9/builds/29883 > > Buildbot URL: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/ > > Buildslave for this Build: as-bldslv2 > > Build Reason: scheduler > Build Source Stamp: [branch trunk] 246031 > Blamelist: davide > > BUILD FAILED: failed compile > > sincerely, > -The Buildbot > > >I see frequent timeouts on this bot -- can the timeout be increased? Thank you for the service offered! -- Davide "There are no solved problems; there are only problems that are more or less solved" -- Henri Poincare
Renato Golin via llvm-dev
2015-Aug-26 14:12 UTC
[llvm-dev] buildbot failure in LLVM on clang-native-arm-cortex-a9
On 26 August 2015 at 15:07, Davide Italiano <davide at freebsd.org> wrote:> I see frequent timeouts on this bot -- can the timeout be increased?Hi Davide, Increasing the timeout is not ideal. We need to fix the problem in a different way. Our other ARM bots are using CMake 3.2 + Ninja 1.5, which gets rid of one source of time outs (slow testing), so that may be one way out. For now, please ignore any timeout on bots, as they happen not just with this one. :) cheers, --renato
Tobias Grosser via llvm-dev
2015-Aug-26 14:32 UTC
[llvm-dev] buildbot failure in LLVM on clang-native-arm-cortex-a9
On 08/26/2015 04:12 PM, Renato Golin via llvm-dev wrote:> On 26 August 2015 at 15:07, Davide Italiano <davide at freebsd.org> wrote: >> I see frequent timeouts on this bot -- can the timeout be increased? > > Hi Davide, > > Increasing the timeout is not ideal. We need to fix the problem in a > different way. > > Our other ARM bots are using CMake 3.2 + Ninja 1.5, which gets rid of > one source of time outs (slow testing), so that may be one way out. > > For now, please ignore any timeout on bots, as they happen not just > with this one. :)What's the problem with increasing the timeout? Asking people to ignore buildbot mails does not seem right. If the buildbot is flaky I believe the buildbot owner should ensure it shuts up until the problems have been resolved and the buildbot has a low false positive rate again. Best, Tobias
Seemingly Similar Threads
- buildbot failure in LLVM on clang-native-arm-cortex-a9
- buildbot failure in LLVM on clang-native-arm-cortex-a9
- buildbot failure in LLVM on clang-native-arm-cortex-a9
- buildbot failure in LLVM on clang-native-arm-cortex-a9
- buildbot failure in LLVM on clang-native-arm-cortex-a9