andreybokhanko
2015-May-08 16:04 UTC
[LLVMdev] [Openmp-dev] OpenMP 3.1 Implementation Complete
It will come on next week. I'd like to give a chance to everyone to raise their objections first. Yours, Andrey> 8 мая 2015 г., в 18:30, Jack Howarth <howarth.mailing.lists at gmail.com> написал(а): > > Is there a proposed patch yet for switching the -fopenmp support over > to the openmp library instead of libgomp? I realize the call to rename > the library may be complicating this process. Perhaps the switch of > the default library should be done first under the current libiomp5 > name and that tested for a few days first before using follow on > patches to switch the library name to llomp or whatever. I would be > nice to no longer have to feed clang "-fopenmp=libiomp5 -Xclang > -fopenmp=libiomp5". > Jack > > On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 9:26 AM, Andrey Bokhanko > <andreybokhanko at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 10:53 PM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: >>> Congratulations! Would you like to add a blurb to the release notes >>> for the next release? >> >> Sure! Will do. >> >> Yours, >> Andrey >> _______________________________________________ >> Openmp-dev mailing list >> Openmp-dev at dcs-maillist2.engr.illinois.edu >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/openmp-dev
Jack Howarth
2015-May-08 16:21 UTC
[LLVMdev] [Openmp-dev] OpenMP 3.1 Implementation Complete
So you plan on switching and enabling the openmp library defaults as well as changing the openmp library name at the same time? Jack On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 12:04 PM, andreybokhanko <andreybokhanko at gmail.com> wrote:> It will come on next week. > > I'd like to give a chance to everyone to raise their objections first. > > Yours, > Andrey > >> 8 мая 2015 г., в 18:30, Jack Howarth <howarth.mailing.lists at gmail.com> написал(а): >> >> Is there a proposed patch yet for switching the -fopenmp support over >> to the openmp library instead of libgomp? I realize the call to rename >> the library may be complicating this process. Perhaps the switch of >> the default library should be done first under the current libiomp5 >> name and that tested for a few days first before using follow on >> patches to switch the library name to llomp or whatever. I would be >> nice to no longer have to feed clang "-fopenmp=libiomp5 -Xclang >> -fopenmp=libiomp5". >> Jack >> >> On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 9:26 AM, Andrey Bokhanko >> <andreybokhanko at gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 10:53 PM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: >>>> Congratulations! Would you like to add a blurb to the release notes >>>> for the next release? >>> >>> Sure! Will do. >>> >>> Yours, >>> Andrey >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Openmp-dev mailing list >>> Openmp-dev at dcs-maillist2.engr.illinois.edu >>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/openmp-dev
Andrey Bokhanko
2015-May-08 20:10 UTC
[LLVMdev] [Openmp-dev] OpenMP 3.1 Implementation Complete
No, just changing defaults -- subject to code reviewers approval. As I said before, I prefer to leave library naming to library pros. Andrey On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 7:21 PM, Jack Howarth <howarth.mailing.lists at gmail.com> wrote:> So you plan on switching and enabling the openmp library defaults as > well as changing the openmp library name at the same time? > Jack > > On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 12:04 PM, andreybokhanko > <andreybokhanko at gmail.com> wrote: >> It will come on next week. >> >> I'd like to give a chance to everyone to raise their objections first. >> >> Yours, >> Andrey >> >>> 8 мая 2015 г., в 18:30, Jack Howarth <howarth.mailing.lists at gmail.com> написал(а): >>> >>> Is there a proposed patch yet for switching the -fopenmp support over >>> to the openmp library instead of libgomp? I realize the call to rename >>> the library may be complicating this process. Perhaps the switch of >>> the default library should be done first under the current libiomp5 >>> name and that tested for a few days first before using follow on >>> patches to switch the library name to llomp or whatever. I would be >>> nice to no longer have to feed clang "-fopenmp=libiomp5 -Xclang >>> -fopenmp=libiomp5". >>> Jack >>> >>> On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 9:26 AM, Andrey Bokhanko >>> <andreybokhanko at gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 10:53 PM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: >>>>> Congratulations! Would you like to add a blurb to the release notes >>>>> for the next release? >>>> >>>> Sure! Will do. >>>> >>>> Yours, >>>> Andrey >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Openmp-dev mailing list >>>> Openmp-dev at dcs-maillist2.engr.illinois.edu >>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/openmp-dev
Reasonably Related Threads
- [LLVMdev] [Openmp-dev] OpenMP 3.1 Implementation Complete
- [LLVMdev] [Openmp-dev] OpenMP 3.1 Implementation Complete
- [LLVMdev] [Openmp-dev] OpenMP 3.1 Implementation Complete
- [LLVMdev] OpenMP 3.1 Implementation Complete
- [LLVMdev] libiomp, not libgomp as default library linked with -fopenmp