We're inconsistent about using DW_AT_MIPS_linkage_name versus DW_AT_linkage_name. Variables (see DwarfCompileUnit::getOrCreateGlobalVariableDIE()) get the standard attribute for DWARF >= 4, MIPS for older. Subprograms (see DwarfUnit::applySubprogramDefinitionAttributes()) always get DW_AT_MIPS_linkage_name (no version check). Before I go drudging through however many tests will die if I add a version check... we DO want to fix this, right? Thanks, --paulr P.S. PS4 doesn't want linkage names at all, which will probably be even more painful test-wise, but it seemed like cleaning up this bit should come first regardless.
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 3:37 PM Robinson, Paul < Paul_Robinson at playstation.sony.com> wrote:> We're inconsistent about using DW_AT_MIPS_linkage_name versus > DW_AT_linkage_name. > > Variables (see DwarfCompileUnit::getOrCreateGlobalVariableDIE()) > get the standard attribute for DWARF >= 4, MIPS for older. > > Subprograms (see DwarfUnit::applySubprogramDefinitionAttributes()) > always get DW_AT_MIPS_linkage_name (no version check). > >Probably just a bug. It's definitely not intentional on my part.> Before I go drudging through however many tests will die if I add > a version check... we DO want to fix this, right? >Yep.> Thanks, > --paulr > > P.S. PS4 doesn't want linkage names at all, which will probably > be even more painful test-wise, but it seemed like cleaning up > this bit should come first regardless. > >Yeah. Other fun is various different vendor attributes that we probably don't want depending on debugger that's going to be used. -fgdb-extensions, -flldb-extensions, -f<whatever your debugger is called>-extensions? -eric> > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150306/f1dc514b/attachment.html>
Yeah. Other fun is various different vendor attributes that we probably don't want depending on debugger that's going to be used. -fgdb-extensions, -flldb-extensions, -f<whatever your debugger is called>-extensions? Yeah, we've been tolerating all those DW_AT_APPLE_* things for years. Never quite annoying or space-consuming enough to do something about. ☺ Being able to specify debugger-specific behavior separately from target is an intriguing idea. Would sure make the testing easier even if end users don't care. --paulr From: Eric Christopher [mailto:echristo at gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2015 4:57 PM To: Robinson, Paul; LLVM Developers Mailing List (llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu) Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] DW_AT_[MIPS_]linkage_name inconsistency On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 3:37 PM Robinson, Paul <Paul_Robinson at playstation.sony.com<mailto:Paul_Robinson at playstation.sony.com>> wrote: We're inconsistent about using DW_AT_MIPS_linkage_name versus DW_AT_linkage_name. Variables (see DwarfCompileUnit::getOrCreateGlobalVariableDIE()) get the standard attribute for DWARF >= 4, MIPS for older. Subprograms (see DwarfUnit::applySubprogramDefinitionAttributes()) always get DW_AT_MIPS_linkage_name (no version check). Probably just a bug. It's definitely not intentional on my part. Before I go drudging through however many tests will die if I add a version check... we DO want to fix this, right? Yep. Thanks, --paulr P.S. PS4 doesn't want linkage names at all, which will probably be even more painful test-wise, but it seemed like cleaning up this bit should come first regardless. Yeah. Other fun is various different vendor attributes that we probably don't want depending on debugger that's going to be used. -fgdb-extensions, -flldb-extensions, -f<whatever your debugger is called>-extensions? -eric _______________________________________________ LLVM Developers mailing list LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu<mailto:LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu> http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150306/79580886/attachment.html>
Seemingly Similar Threads
- [LLVMdev] DWARF unmangled subprog name (DW_AT_name)
- [LLVMdev] DWARF unmangled subprog name (DW_AT_name)
- [LLVMdev] DWARF unmangled subprog name (DW_AT_name)
- [LLVMdev] DWARF unmangled subprog name (DW_AT_name)
- [LLVMdev] DWARF unmangled subprog name (DW_AT_name)