llvm dev - Feb 2015 - [LLVMdev] OrcJIT in LLVM C bindings

Hello,

I was wondering if there is someone already working on putting the new
OrcJIT APIs in the LLVM-C bindings?

Also, is there a general consensus to also add C bindings when new major
features are added?

Hayden
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150201/061f5949/attachment.html>

On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Hayden Livingston <halivingston at
gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was wondering if there is someone already working on putting the new
> OrcJIT APIs in the LLVM-C bindings?
>
> Also, is there a general consensus to also add C bindings when new major
> features are added?
>
Generally not, so far as I know. Things are added to the C bindings on an
as-needed basis, generally.

>
> Hayden
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150201/883172b6/attachment.html>

Thanks, David.

I'd be happy to add the bindings .. is there a general way we add them? Or
do you just scrub the API and make sensible judgements to the API?

On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 1:55 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Hayden Livingston <halivingston at
gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I was wondering if there is someone already working on putting the new
>> OrcJIT APIs in the LLVM-C bindings?
>>
>> Also, is there a general consensus to also add C bindings when new
major
>> features are added?
>>
>
> Generally not, so far as I know. Things are added to the C bindings on an
> as-needed basis, generally.
>
>
>>
>> Hayden
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150203/eefac331/attachment.html>

HI Hayden,

There's no plan to expose any of the Orc APIs directly just yet -
they're still very experimental.

We could add a call to opt-in to using OrcMCJITReplacement rather than MCJIT
though.

Cheers,
Lang.
> On Feb 1, 2015, at 10:58 AM, Hayden Livingston <halivingston at
gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I was wondering if there is someone already working on putting the new
OrcJIT APIs in the LLVM-C bindings?
> 
> Also, is there a general consensus to also add C bindings when new major
features are added?
> 
> Hayden
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev