Jonathan Roelofs
2014-Jul-09 18:39 UTC
[LLVMdev] [PATCH][REQUEST] Could someone submit this CSR Kalimba definitions patch please?
On 7/9/14, 12:33 PM, Eric Christopher wrote:> Any reason why you deleted code that isn't related? > > -eric > >> - enum SubArchType { >> - NoSubArch, >> - >> - ARMSubArch_v8, >> - ARMSubArch_v7, >> - ARMSubArch_v7em, >> - ARMSubArch_v7m, >> - ARMSubArch_v7s, >> - ARMSubArch_v6, >> - ARMSubArch_v6m, >> - ARMSubArch_v6t2, >> - ARMSubArch_v5, >> - ARMSubArch_v5te, >> - ARMSubArch_v4t, >> - ARMSubArch_v4 >> - };Eric, looks like a misleading diff... that SubArchType stuff was reverted recently in trunk. Jon -- Jon Roelofs jonathan at codesourcery.com CodeSourcery / Mentor Embedded
Eric Christopher
2014-Jul-09 18:49 UTC
[LLVMdev] [PATCH][REQUEST] Could someone submit this CSR Kalimba definitions patch please?
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Jonathan Roelofs <jonathan at codesourcery.com> wrote:> > > On 7/9/14, 12:33 PM, Eric Christopher wrote: >> >> Any reason why you deleted code that isn't related? >> >> -eric >> >>> - enum SubArchType { >>> - NoSubArch, >>> - >>> - ARMSubArch_v8, >>> - ARMSubArch_v7, >>> - ARMSubArch_v7em, >>> - ARMSubArch_v7m, >>> - ARMSubArch_v7s, >>> - ARMSubArch_v6, >>> - ARMSubArch_v6m, >>> - ARMSubArch_v6t2, >>> - ARMSubArch_v5, >>> - ARMSubArch_v5te, >>> - ARMSubArch_v4t, >>> - ARMSubArch_v4 >>> - }; > > > Eric, looks like a misleading diff... that SubArchType stuff was reverted > recently in trunk. >I recall that patch going across. There's just no reason for it in the diff from Matthew. -eric
Matthew Gardiner
2014-Jul-10 07:14 UTC
[LLVMdev] [PATCH][REQUEST] Could someone submit this CSR Kalimba definitions patch please?
Eric Christopher wrote:> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Jonathan Roelofs > <jonathan at codesourcery.com> wrote: >> >> On 7/9/14, 12:33 PM, Eric Christopher wrote: >>> Any reason why you deleted code that isn't related? >>> >>> -eric >>> >>>> - enum SubArchType { >>>> - NoSubArch, >>>> - >>>> - ARMSubArch_v8, >>>> - ARMSubArch_v7, >>>> - ARMSubArch_v7em, >>>> - ARMSubArch_v7m, >>>> - ARMSubArch_v7s, >>>> - ARMSubArch_v6, >>>> - ARMSubArch_v6m, >>>> - ARMSubArch_v6t2, >>>> - ARMSubArch_v5, >>>> - ARMSubArch_v5te, >>>> - ARMSubArch_v4t, >>>> - ARMSubArch_v4 >>>> - }; >> >> Eric, looks like a misleading diff... that SubArchType stuff was reverted >> recently in trunk. >> > I recall that patch going across. There's just no reason for it in the > diff from Matthew. > > -eric > > > To report this email as spam click https://www.mailcontrol.com/sr/MZbqvYs5QwJvpeaetUwhCQ== .Hi people, I apologise for the earlier bad diff. Here's one I've just generated against the latest svn. The TOT sources build fine with these additions. Is there any reason now why this patch cannot be submitted on my behalf? My concern is that I cannot submit further work for our chips to lldb until I have these definitions in llvm::Triple. I'll also repost this patch to llvm-commits. Thanks for your time and patience, Matt Index: include/llvm/ADT/Triple.h ==================================================================--- include/llvm/ADT/Triple.h (revision 212686) +++ include/llvm/ADT/Triple.h (working copy) @@ -76,7 +76,8 @@ le32, // le32: generic little-endian 32-bit CPU (PNaCl / Emscripten) amdil, // amdil: amd IL spir, // SPIR: standard portable IR for OpenCL 32-bit version - spir64 // SPIR: standard portable IR for OpenCL 64-bit version + spir64, // SPIR: standard portable IR for OpenCL 64-bit version + kalimba // Kalimba: generic kalimba }; enum VendorType { UnknownVendor, @@ -89,7 +90,8 @@ Freescale, IBM, ImaginationTechnologies, - NVIDIA + NVIDIA, + CSR }; enum OSType { UnknownOS, Index: lib/Support/Triple.cpp ==================================================================--- lib/Support/Triple.cpp (revision 212686) +++ lib/Support/Triple.cpp (working copy) @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ case amdil: return "amdil"; case spir: return "spir"; case spir64: return "spir64"; + case kalimba: return "kalimba"; } llvm_unreachable("Invalid ArchType!"); @@ -101,6 +102,7 @@ case amdil: return "amdil"; case spir: return "spir"; case spir64: return "spir"; + case kalimba: return "kalimba"; } } @@ -117,6 +119,7 @@ case IBM: return "ibm"; case ImaginationTechnologies: return "img"; case NVIDIA: return "nvidia"; + case CSR: return "csr"; } llvm_unreachable("Invalid VendorType!"); @@ -208,6 +211,7 @@ .Case("amdil", amdil) .Case("spir", spir) .Case("spir64", spir64) + .Case("kalimba", kalimba) .Default(UnknownArch); } @@ -281,6 +285,7 @@ .Case("amdil", Triple::amdil) .Case("spir", Triple::spir) .Case("spir64", Triple::spir64) + .Case("kalimba", Triple::kalimba) .Default(Triple::UnknownArch); } @@ -295,6 +300,7 @@ .Case("ibm", Triple::IBM) .Case("img", Triple::ImaginationTechnologies) .Case("nvidia", Triple::NVIDIA) + .Case("csr", Triple::CSR) .Default(Triple::UnknownVendor); } @@ -800,6 +806,7 @@ case llvm::Triple::x86: case llvm::Triple::xcore: case llvm::Triple::spir: + case llvm::Triple::kalimba: return 32; case llvm::Triple::arm64: Member of the CSR plc group of companies. CSR plc registered in England and Wales, registered number 4187346, registered office Churchill House, Cambridge Business Park, Cowley Road, Cambridge, CB4 0WZ, United Kingdom More information can be found at www.csr.com. Keep up to date with CSR on our technical blog, www.csr.com/blog, CSR people blog, www.csr.com/people, YouTube, www.youtube.com/user/CSRplc, Facebook, www.facebook.com/pages/CSR/191038434253534, or follow us on Twitter at www.twitter.com/CSR_plc. New for 2014, you can now access the wide range of products powered by aptX at www.aptx.com. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Triple.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 2334 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140710/84b38df9/attachment.bin>
Possibly Parallel Threads
- [LLVMdev] [PATCH][REQUEST] Could someone submit this CSR Kalimba definitions patch please?
- [LLVMdev] [PATCH][REQUEST] Could someone submit this CSR Kalimba definitions patch please?
- [LLVMdev] Machine Code for different architectures
- Anyone ports Opus to CSR Kalimba DSP?
- [LLVMdev] Machine Code for different architectures