Jason Molenda
2014-Mar-29 07:48 UTC
[LLVMdev] Contributing the Apple ARM64 compiler backend (re. lldb bits)
Not subscribed to the list, sorry to mess up the message threading - but to touch on one question that was raised earlier in the day, Bob Wilson wrote:> On Mar 28, 2014, at 4:23 PM, Jevin Sweval <jevinsweval at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Is the LLDB patch missing? I only see libc++, compiler-rt, LLVM, and Clang patches > > We have a patch for LLDB but it is combined with a variety of other changes. Someone will have to go through and sort those out first.I'll be committing the arm64 lldb patches. If there's interest, I can post the patch to this list. I was going to hold off until the llvm commit happens (which sounds like it will be very soon) and then I'll commit our arm64 patches to lldb.
Tim Northover
2014-Mar-29 18:19 UTC
[LLVMdev] Contributing the Apple ARM64 compiler backend (re. lldb bits)
Hi Jason,> I'll be committing the arm64 lldb patches. If there's interest, I can post the patch to this list. I was going to hold off until the llvm commit happens (which sounds like it will be very soon) and then I'll commit our arm64 patches to lldb.The LLVM commit's now happened, so you can go ahead with lldb I think. Cheers. Tim.
Jason Molenda
2014-Mar-29 19:03 UTC
[LLVMdev] Contributing the Apple ARM64 compiler backend (re. lldb bits)
On Mar 29, 2014, at 11:19 AM, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote:> Hi Jason, > >> I'll be committing the arm64 lldb patches. If there's interest, I can post the patch to this list. I was going to hold off until the llvm commit happens (which sounds like it will be very soon) and then I'll commit our arm64 patches to lldb. > > The LLVM commit's now happened, so you can go ahead with lldb I think.Thanks Tim. lldb's arm64 support is also checked in.