search for: contributing

Hi, With multiple proposals to improve the situation for newcomers in flight, let me add another brief proposal: Let’s add a CONTRIBUTING.md file to the top-level directory of llvm-project. I think this would make the information about how to contribute more visible and Github uses CONTRIBUTING.md to display ‘Contributing Guidelines’ at a few places, like when creating new issues or pull requests (https://github.blog/2012-09-17-cont...

I have two models, Donor and Contribution, and have has_many and belongs_to set respectively. My question is regarding creation of associated objects. I''ll let the code speak: me = Donor.find(1) contribution = me.contributions.create do |e| e.amount = 164.00 e.category = Category.find(1) end I thought this was valid, but it doesn''t work properly - it appears to

I posted something about this a week ago wihtout response, but have made some progress since. However, I''m still not getting exactly what I want. OK, three core tables: create_table :reference_items do |t| t.column :title, :string, :limit => 255 t.column :year, :integer, :limit => 4 t.column :type, :string t.column

...gain, as stated before, both of these issues are covered by the apache > license. > > > > It has a built-in CLA that explicitly grants both copyright and patent > > rights from contributors when they make contributions to the work. > > Huh? How can employee X of company Y contributing a patch grant any > patent rights on behalf of Y? > > Agent, actual, or apparent authority. All valid. Let's start with: In just about every country in the world, anyone contributing on behalf of their company are exercising their employers copyright (in most cases, even if they do it...

I am working on a methodology for qualifying R, for GLP and GCP. If I quailfy only the base R install, with no contributed packages, it seems relatively simple to qualify R. However, from time to time I will want to use a contributed package. If I use a contributed package, does it leave anything behind that will be loaded with the next invocation of R? Suppose I run R and use a contributed

As requested on http://wiki.centos.org/Contribute, here is my info: # your FirstnameLastname username [SteveBonds] # the proposed subject of your Wiki contribution(s) [Personal Page] # the proposed location of your Wiki contribution(s) [Personal Page] I'll branch out from here. Maybe. While I understand the problem with spammers, asking each user to send each proposed page to the list for

Hello Akemi, I want to give support to CentOs user with any kind of issue, hence please suggest me what should I do for that. And also one thing I am new here so can suggest me the workflow. Gajanan On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 12:43 AM, Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 3:49 AM, Gajanan Kankal <grkankal at gmail.com> > wrote: >> >>

Hi, i would like to contribute to the WiKi. Lots of the articles are outdated... *Username: LucianMaly* *Proposed subject of my contribution(s): for example https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Skype <https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Skype> and https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/OS_Protection <https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/OS_Protection> plus some others* *Proposed location of my

...which are GPLv3 and LGPLv3 (or later) whereas the Linux kernel uses GPLv2. The process is called signing. How to sign your work --------------------- Once you have permission to contribute to Samba from your employer, simply email a copy of the following text from your corporate email address to contributing at samba.org ------------------------------------------------------------ Samba Developer's Certificate of Origin. Version 1.0 By making a contribution to this project, I certify that: (a) The contribution was created in whole or in part by me and I have the right to submit it under the...

...which are GPLv3 and LGPLv3 (or later) whereas the Linux kernel uses GPLv2. The process is called signing. How to sign your work --------------------- Once you have permission to contribute to Samba from your employer, simply email a copy of the following text from your corporate email address to contributing at samba.org ------------------------------------------------------------ Samba Developer's Certificate of Origin. Version 1.0 By making a contribution to this project, I certify that: (a) The contribution was created in whole or in part by me and I have the right to submit it under the...

Hello all, I'd like to contribute to the CentOS wiki. Per these docs[0], I should email this list with the following information. Username: DanielFarrell Contribution subject: Update CBS Koji Poodle patch docs Contribution location: http://goo.gl/7Oe9QO (CBS HOWTO#Quickstart) I'd like to make the docs related to patching Koji for the Poodle exploit[1] generally more clear. For example,

Yep, Wolfgang picked up on the one thing I saw too. This is why I like having people review my stuff. I think it's a bit of a pity that str_offsets_base can point into the middle of a str_offsets contribution in some ways Actually I changed my mind after saying that in the review, and in this writeup I concluded that it cannot do that. str_offsets_base points to the element immediately

> Sorry, but in the first mail I forgot to attach the Makefile and I > forgot also to mention that I already tried the password handling in win95 > via the registry. > > De Boe Bart wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I need to install Samba on a HP J210 HPUX 10.20. > > I downloaded and compiled version 1.9.18p10. > > > > Following problems are

Hello Akemi, I have gone through your mail and provided link and this is my contribution details - the proposed subject of your Wiki contribution(s) :- Provide technical support to CentOS user - the proposed location of your Wiki contribution(s) :- Pune (India) Thanks & Regards, Gajanan Kankal On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote: >

Hi Guys, While updating es/ pages, noted that actually there are two Contribute pages. One in Contribute and other in HowToContribute. I wonder if we could reorganize that a bit. Maybe separate contribution needs by SIGs. Then create a Contribution index page where all those SIG's contribution pages be linked from ? It may be needed to create some SIGs in those areas where they don't

...tml Hopefully, this will make it easier for people to make small contributions to our projects. Again, remember that this is only for trivial contributions. Most contributions will still require a CLA. See the link above for exactly what can / cannot be considered trivial. We will be updating our contributing.md files soon to include this information. If you are unfamiliar with our contribution process, you can get more information and links to our CLA from the Puppet contributing.md file: https://github.com/puppetlabs/puppet/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md For any questions about the process, ping me, and...

Hi all, I'd like to propose the contribution of a Go frontend subproject to the LLVM project, based on the existing llgo project at https://github.com/go-llvm/llgo . As with the previous contribution of the Go bindings, I have obtained permission from all llgo contributors whose code is part of this contribution, to contribute their changes to the LLVM project and relicense their changes

Howdy, as you already know from my intro email, I'm working on CentOS Stream. I'd love to start publishing docs to wiki and therefore need edit access for the wiki.centos.org/contribute tree: could you grant it to me, please? My plan is to create a new document for it: wiki.centos.org/contribute/CentOSStream and then link to it from the contribute document - does that sound right?

Hi Rafael, We’ve discussed why a license change is preferable over the span of several years now. I’m happy to explain over the phone, contact me off list and we can talk. -Chris > On Aug 10, 2017, at 8:33 AM, Rafael Avila de Espindola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > I still don't see any justification in the text why a license change is >

This has already been discussed extensively in the public. The threads are available in the archives. -Chris > On Aug 10, 2017, at 1:05 PM, Rafael Avila de Espindola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > > Sorry, but I really don't think a private conversation is appropriate > for such discussions. > > If the motive cannot be explained in public I have no choice