Hey, I wanted to add an intrinsics to read MSRs. So I added the intrinsics and lowered it to a new ISD node I created ISD::RDMSR, its first operand is the MSR id. I added a case in X86DAGToDAGISel::Select for ISD::RDMSR. Now I know rdmsr works like so: mov r/ecx, <id> rdmsr r/eax holds the lower 32/64 bit>From what I understood this needs a Token Factor node, nodes which aredependent on each other? case X86ISD::RDMSR: { unsigned idReg; SDValue idRegValue; unsigned resultReg; SDLoc dl = SDLoc(Node); SDValue id = Node->getOperand(0); EVT resultType = Node->getValueType(0); if(Subtarget->is64Bit()) { idReg = X86::RCX; resultReg = X86::RAX; } else { idReg = X86::ECX; resultReg = X86::EAX; } idRegValue = CurDAG->getRegister(idReg, resultType); SmallVector<SDValue, 8> Ops; SDValue setIdNode = CurDAG->getCopyToReg(CurDAG->getEntryNode(), dl, idRegValue, id, SDValue()); SDValue rdmsrNode = SDValue(CurDAG->getMachineNode(X86::RDMSR, dl, MVT::Other, setIdNode), 0); SDValue resultNode = CurDAG->getCopyFromReg(rdmsrNode, dl, resultReg, resultType); Ops.push_back(resultNode); Ops.push_back(rdmsrNode); Ops.push_back(setIdNode); SDValue ResultValue = CurDAG->getNode(ISD::TokenFactor, dl, resultType, &Ops[0], Ops.size()); return ResultValue.getNode(); } But when I run this I get: Assertion failed: I != VRBaseMap.end() && "Node emitted out of order - late", file ..\..\..\..\lib\CodeGen\SelectionDAG\InstrEmitter.cpp, line 292 I know that I can just do this using in-line assembly instead of an intrinsics but I want to learn a bit about LLVM development so I though doing this (which I need anyway) will be a good way. I'm pretty new to LLVM and I tried searching for the answer, but maybe I misunderstood the answers or didn't find the correct post or code to look at. Help will be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance. -- View this message in context: http://llvm.1065342.n5.nabble.com/selecting-ISD-node-help-tp65819.html Sent from the LLVM - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi DaAn,> From what I understood this needs a Token Factor node, nodes which are > dependent on each other?A TokenFactor probably isn't needed here. That's for when you have a bunch of operations and you want to say to LLVM that you don't care what order they happen in amongst themselves but certain things have to happen after all of them have completed. In this case, the most obvious analogue is probably division on x86, which also has fixed registers (no doubt other instructions do too, but that's the one I know about). If you compile a simple division function: define i32 @foo(i32 %a, i32 %b) { %res = sdiv i32 %a, %b ret i32 %res } with: llc simple.ll -view-sched-dags you should get a nice post-script rendered view of what's going on. You seem to have the most important bit already: the instruction should be bracketed by copyToReg and copyFromReg nodes. I think the bit that might be missing is that all three nodes should be connected by what's called "glue" (drawn in red on that view-sched-dags output). A "chain" (the dotted blue lines your code is attempting to use) probably isn't enough because LLVM might feel free to put unrelated instructions in the middle, which could clobber your registers -- there's no data-dependence as far as LLVM is concerned at this stage. The code used for DIV is around X86ISelDAGToDAG.cpp:2415, but from a glance the key points seem to be: 1. use the second result of getCopyToReg (i.e. SDValue(setIdNode, 1)) in the RDMSR node. 2. Give your RDMSR node type MVT::Glue instead of MVT::Other You should then return the first output of the CopyFromReg node itself. That said, none of this addresses your actual error message. Fortunately, it looks like it's happening a bit later so I'd only worry about it if it still occurred when the DAG was looking how I expected (via -view-sched-dags). Hope this helps. Let me know if you have more problems. Tim.
Hi Tim, Tim Northover-2 wrote> The code used for DIV is around X86ISelDAGToDAG.cpp:2415, but from a > glance the key points seem to be: > 1. use the second result of getCopyToReg (i.e. SDValue(setIdNode, 1)) > in the RDMSR node. > 2. Give your RDMSR node type MVT::Glue instead of MVT::OtherI tried doing what you said, and the DAG looks like how I think it supposed to look like (attached the picture below). if(Subtarget->is64Bit()) { idReg = X86::RCX; resultReg = MF.addLiveIn(X86::RAX, &X86::GR64RegClass); } else { idReg = X86::ECX; resultReg = MF.addLiveIn(X86::EAX, &X86::GR32RegClass); } idRegValue = CurDAG->getRegister(idReg, resultType); SDValue setIdNode = CurDAG->getCopyToReg(CurDAG->getEntryNode(), dl, idRegValue, id, SDValue()); SDValue rdmsrNode = SDValue(CurDAG->getMachineNode(X86::RDMSR, dl, MVT::Glue, setIdNode.getValue(1)), 0); SDValue resultNode = CurDAG->getCopyFromReg(CurDAG->getEntryNode(), dl, X86::EAX, MVT::i32, rdmsrNode); return resultNode.getNode(); but I've a couple of problems: getCopyToReg doesn't show on the final assembly __Z5test2v proc near push ebp mov ebp, esp rdmsr pop ebp retn __Z5test2v endp When I add rdmsr + rdmsr, first the rdmsr calls are made and only then he adds eax, eax. __Z5test3v proc near push ebp mov ebp, esp rdmsr rdmsr add eax, eax pop ebp retn __Z5test3v endp Maybe it's because I use MF.addLiveIn but when I tried using X86::EAX it failed with the message: # Machine code for function _Z5test2v: Post SSA BB#0: derived from LLVM BB %entry %vreg2<def> = COPY %EAX; GR32:%vreg2 RDMSR %EAX<def> = COPY %vreg2; GR32:%vreg2 RET %EAX<kill> # End machine code for function _Z5test2v. *** Bad machine code: Using an undefined physical register *** - function: _Z5test2v - basic block: BB#0 entry (0x2ff8228) - instruction: %vreg2<def> = COPY %EAX; GR32:%vreg2 - operand 1: %EAX LLVM ERROR: Found 1 machine code errors. Stack dump: 0. Program arguments: C:\Users\DaAn\Documents\Projects\llvm-3.4\build\bin\Debug\llc.exe -filetype=obj -view-sched-dags C:\Users\DaAn\Documents\Projects\llvm-3.4\build\bin\Debug\test.bc 1. Running pass 'Function Pass Manager' on module 'C:\Users\DaAn\Documents\Projects\llvm-3.4\build\bin\Debug\test.bc'. 2. Running pass 'Greedy Register Allocator' on function '@_Z5test2v' <http://llvm.1065342.n5.nabble.com/file/n65821/dag._Z5test2v-4ac530.png> <http://llvm.1065342.n5.nabble.com/file/n65821/dag._Z5test3v-e16193.png> -- View this message in context: http://llvm.1065342.n5.nabble.com/selecting-ISD-node-help-tp65819p65821.html Sent from the LLVM - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Seemingly Similar Threads
- [LLVMdev] selecting ISD node - help
- Custom Application For Asterisk
- [LLVMdev] Question on C++ code completion - function parameter list
- LLVM IR intrinsics placeholder for strings [was Re: Back end with special loop instructions (using LLVM IR intrinsics)]
- Missing formal definition of "declare"?