Is anyone maintaining this page? http://llvm.org/docs/SourceLevelDebugging.html#composite-type-descriptors DIBuilder::createSubroutineType seems to generate metadatas with a different format. Thanks! Wei -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130829/70facf50/attachment.html>
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 6:58 AM, Pan, Wei <wei.pan at intel.com> wrote:> Is anyone maintaining this page?ish. We sometimes forget to update it for a while.> http://llvm.org/docs/SourceLevelDebugging.html#composite-type-descriptors > > > > DIBuilder::createSubroutineType seems to generate metadatas with a different > format.composite types recently got one new field (a string unique identifier) & the template arguments field was made non-optional. Were there other differences you noticed/were referring to?
Yes, that is what I was mentioning. (I did not go through all of them.) There are also some minor alignment issues such as - basic, derived, composite type descriptors (second fields) - subprogram descriptor (Function field) -----Original Message----- From: David Blaikie [mailto:dblaikie at gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2013 11:39 AM To: Pan, Wei; Manman Ren Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] outdated debug metamata doc? On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 6:58 AM, Pan, Wei <wei.pan at intel.com> wrote:> Is anyone maintaining this page?ish. We sometimes forget to update it for a while.> http://llvm.org/docs/SourceLevelDebugging.html#composite-type-descript > ors > > > > DIBuilder::createSubroutineType seems to generate metadatas with a > different format.composite types recently got one new field (a string unique identifier) & the template arguments field was made non-optional. Were there other differences you noticed/were referring to?
On Aug 29, 2013 7:01 AM, "Pan, Wei" <wei.pan at intel.com> wrote:> > Is anyone maintaining this page? >Yes. Manman needs to update it after her last few changes. Thanks. -eric> > > http://llvm.org/docs/SourceLevelDebugging.html#composite-type-descriptors > > > > DIBuilder::createSubroutineType seems to generate metadatas with adifferent format.> > > > Thanks! > > > > Wei > > > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130829/0f714c7b/attachment.html>
Reasonably Related Threads
- [LLVMdev] outdated debug metamata doc?
- [LLVMdev] outdated debug metamata doc?
- [LLVMdev] Passing DW_TAG_typedef as the type to DIBuilder's createFunction
- [LLVMdev] Passing DW_TAG_typedef as the type to DIBuilder's createFunction
- [LLVMdev] Passing DW_TAG_typedef as the type to DIBuilder's createFunction