search for: metadatas

Dear all, I have the following source code: long f(long x, long y) { long u; u = x+y; return u; }; After clang (with debug option set) and llvm opt using mem2reg, I get the following .ll file *************************************************************************** ; ModuleID = '<stdin>' target datalayout =

Hi all, I'm using my own front-end to generate following code .ll file targeting x86 32-bit: ; ModuleID = 'check.c' target datalayout = "e-p:32:32:32-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:32:64-f32:32:32-f64:32:64-v64:64:64-v128:128:128-a0:0:64-f80:32:32-n8:16:32" target triple = "i386-pc-linux-gnu" @.str581 = internal constant [52 x i8] c"---- test number %d

I figured out my previous problem with DIBuilder. However, now I can't seem to get the compiler to emit location information for local variables. Here's how my IR looks: --- define i32 @"\01_main"() { init: %exception1 = alloca i8* %0 = alloca i32 %"bar:Int32" = alloca i32 %1 = alloca i32 %2 = alloca i32* br label %code code:

On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Arvind Sudarsanam <arvind.sudarsanam at aggiemail.usu.edu> wrote: > Dear all, > > I have the following source code: > > long f(long x, long y) > { >        long u; > >   u = x+y; >   return u; > }; > > After clang (with debug option set) and llvm opt using mem2reg, I get > the following .ll file >

Hi, I want to know the variable mapping between the source and llvm bytecode. It seems that current llvm debugging information cannot provide this mapping directly. Here is my examples (llvm 2.7). In this exmaple, I want to know the mapping: tmp<--->%4. But current llvm's debugging information can only provide that the instruction "%4 = add nsw i32 %3, 2" is at line 3 in

Hi all, Anyone have ideas/info on this topic ? Thanks Seb 2012/3/2 Seb <babslachem at gmail.com> > Hi all, > > I'm using my own front-end to generate following code .ll file targeting > x86 32-bit: > > ; ModuleID = 'check.c' > target datalayout = >

Hi Duncan, But in the doc "Source Level Debugging with LLVM", it shows that llvm 2.6 could get column number. There's an example in the doc as following: http://llvm.org/docs/SourceLevelDebugging.html 1. void foo() { 2. int X = 21; 3. int Y = 22; 4. { 5. int Z = 23; 6. Z = X; 7. } 8. X = Y; 9. } Compiled to LLVM, this function would be represented

On Mar 6, 2012, at 5:31 AM, Seb <babslachem at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Anyone have ideas/info on this topic ? > Thanks > Seb > > 2012/3/2 Seb <babslachem at gmail.com> > Hi all, > > I'm using my own front-end to generate following code .ll file targeting x86 32-bit: > > ; ModuleID = 'check.c' > target datalayout =

Hello, This is a proposal for implementing "module flags". Please take a look at this and give any feedback you may have. Thanks! -bw Module Flags Metadata Information about the module as a whole is difficult to convey to LLVM's subsystems. The LLVM IR isn't sufficient to transmit this information. One should instead use the llvm.module.flags named

Hi, I tried llvm-gcc -g -O0 on several cases, but the column field of meta data always shows zero in created ll code. Does llvm-gcc emit column # info ? Or I should add some option? Thanks in advance. Sheng. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100426/76b52b1f/attachment.html>

I found the problem. The llvm.dbg.declare call must have a !dbg tag, otherwise the location info is not generated. Changing the invocation in my original example to "call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata !{i32* %"bar:Int32"}, metadata !13), !dbg !16" causes MC to generate the local location as expected. -Joe On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Joe Groff <arcata at

Hi, I want to get the mapping between C source's variables and bytecode variables. It seems that llvm doesn't provide this mapping, so I think a walk-around method is to get the instruction's mapping. I have to use llvm-gcc, not clang. Any advice? Thanks. Best, Kecheng 2010-05-13 From: Eli Friedman Date: 2010-05-13 15:38:36 To: Kecheng Cc: llvmdev Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] How

Hi everyone, I am using the dragonegg plugin to produce bitcode for the following small C program: int main() { 1: int x = -5; 2: x = 6; 3: return 0; } The assignments on lines 1 and 2 are removed even when no optimization flags are specified. I tried making variable "x" volatile, which prevents the assignments from being removed, however I am no longer able to recover the original

Could you expand on likely uses other than ObjC? For example, should float ABI (soft/softfp/hard) be conveyed via this mechanism? deep On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 9:36 PM, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > Hello, > > This is a proposal for implementing "module flags". Please take a look at this and give any feedback you may have. > > Thanks! > -bw >

Eli, Thanks very much for your reply. That's what I want to know. It works for this example. But I usually have to deal with the optimized bytecode with "-O". See the example: ************** C source ************** int h (int j, int i) { int tmp; tmp = j+i+2; return tmp; } +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ .ll file: ; ModuleID = 'simplecase.c' target

Hi all, I was wondering if we could use named metadata to store some of C++ logic without changing the IR. This is primarily only for front-end buiding and the resulting IR (with or without metadata) should be the same as it is today (or better). I say this because of the number of global variables front-ends need to keep because LLVM IR cannot represent all the information of types, vatriables,

Hi Sandeep, ObjC is the first place that I will use it, of course (we need it to fix LTO). Other uses will come along later. (I don't know enough about the float ABI issues to say whether they should be done via module flags or not.) The OpenCL people have a need for named metadata for their stuff. I would hope that module flags would be a good fit for that, but that remains to be seen. But

Hi all, In LLVM documentation about source level debugging (http://www.llvm.org/releases/2.9/docs/SourceLevelDebugging.html) Subprogram descriptor is defined as: !2 = metadata !{ i32, ;; Tag = 46 + LLVMDebugVersion <http://www.llvm.org/releases/2.9/docs/SourceLevelDebugging.html#LLVMDebugVersion> ;; (DW_TAG_subprogram) i32, ;; Unused field. metadata, ;;

Hi Jim, Thanks for the advice. Since I'm using LLVM 2.9 style of debug information. Will this code benefit from those improvement or should I generate LLVM 3.0 style of debug information ? Best Regards Seb 2012/3/6 Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> > > On Mar 6, 2012, at 5:31 AM, Seb <babslachem at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > Anyone have ideas/info on

On 02/19/2013 05:51 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: > Understood. If you have some time, it seems that there are several sub-tasks: > > - Update the language reference Document the additional optional iteration id argument to llvm.mem.parallel_loop_access? I'll do this. > - Update the loop vectorizer (to update the metadata when it unrolls) > - Update the regular unroller