llvm dev - Jan 2013 - [LLVMdev] Will LLVM be suitable for developing valgrind like tools

Hi All
Though, I have used clang which is great. I am dumb in LLVM design.
Will somebody be kind enough to answer
Will LLVM be suitable for developing valgrind like tools?

Regards
--Dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130107/84a92ae4/attachment.html>

Depends on what you mean by Valgrind-like tools. Valgrind itself is a
dynamic binary instrumentation framework, and not an error detector.
Valgrind instruments code in run-time.

If you're referring to the commonly used Memcheck tool (default tool),
then AddressSanitizer[1], a memory-error detector is implemented in
clang (-f-address-sanitizer), and detects out-of-bounds errors, use
after free and some others.

- Peter

[1]: http://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/wiki/AddressSanitizer

On mån, 2013-01-07 at 21:12 +0530, Devchandra L Meetei
wrote:
> Hi All
> Though, I have used clang which is great. I am dumb in LLVM design. 
> Will somebody be kind enough to answer
> Will LLVM be suitable for developing valgrind like tools?
> 
> Regards
> --Dev
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev