Am I the only one who thinks that it is impractical that the Sphinx intro is buried deep within the lld documentation? I suggest moving it to the Programming Documentation document. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120616/2cb7356d/attachment.html>
On the other hand, it's the first result on google for "llvm sphinx". --Sean Silva On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote:> Am I the only one who thinks that it is impractical that the Sphinx intro > is buried deep within the lld documentation? I suggest moving it to the > Programming Documentation document. > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120615/692ffd86/attachment.html>
Yup, that's how I normally find it :) But Google updates their search results as the net changes. It doesn't take that long; perhaps a week or so. Perhaps we can make a compromise? Include a link to it in the Programming Documentation document while keeping it in its current location? 2012/6/16 Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu>> On the other hand, it's the first result on google for "llvm sphinx". > > --Sean Silva > > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org>wrote: > >> Am I the only one who thinks that it is impractical that the Sphinx intro >> is buried deep within the lld documentation? I suggest moving it to the >> Programming Documentation document. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> LLVM Developers mailing list >> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev >> >> >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120616/5c440aeb/attachment.html>
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote:> Am I the only one who thinks that it is impractical that the Sphinx intro is > buried deep within the lld documentation? I suggest moving it to the > Programming Documentation document.Agreed that it needs to move to llvm proper, this was always the plan. I think the only thing we were waiting on was setting up intersphinx correctly. - Michael Spencer
This is just a historical accident, I started with Sphinxifying lld first because it was small and simple. I agree the intro should move into the LLVM docs and we can just change the lld link to point there. - Daniel On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com> wrote:> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: >> Am I the only one who thinks that it is impractical that the Sphinx intro is >> buried deep within the lld documentation? I suggest moving it to the >> Programming Documentation document. > > Agreed that it needs to move to llvm proper, this was always the plan. > I think the only thing we were waiting on was setting up intersphinx > correctly. > > - Michael Spencer
Seemingly Similar Threads
- [LLVMdev] LLVM Sphinx intro buried in lld doc?
- [LLVMdev] LLVM Sphinx intro buried in lld doc?
- [LLVMdev] Anybody translating the LLVM FAQ from HTML to Sphinx?
- [LLVMdev] Anybody translating the LLVM FAQ from HTML to Sphinx?
- [LLVMdev] Anybody translating the LLVM FAQ from HTML to Sphinx?