As of today, there are two weeks left until we branch for the 3.0 release. Please get your changes in as soon as possible so that they are well-tested before the branch. And please keep on top of any failures you see. Now would be a good time to look through the bugzilla database to see if there are any issues you can address. :-) -bw
Joerg Sonnenberger
2011-Oct-06 21:35 UTC
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Release: Two Weeks 'Til 3.0 Branch
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 04:45:33PM -0700, Bill Wendling wrote:> As of today, there are two weeks left until we branch for the 3.0 > release. Please get your changes in as soon as possible so that they > are well-tested before the branch. And please keep on top of any failures you see. > > Now would be a good time to look through the bugzilla database to see > if there are any issues you can address. :-)Is there a list of potential branch blockers? E.g. PR 10912 is a crash-on-valid for Qt4 builds, which is kind of high profile. Joerg
pageexec at freemail.hu
2011-Oct-07 00:54 UTC
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Release: Two Weeks 'Til 3.0 Branch
On 6 Oct 2011 at 23:35, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:> Is there a list of potential branch blockers? E.g. PR 10912 is a > crash-on-valid for Qt4 builds, which is kind of high profile.and there's 4068 for linux :)
Tanya Lattner
2011-Oct-07 05:48 UTC
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Release: Two Weeks 'Til 3.0 Branch
On Oct 6, 2011, at 2:35 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 04:45:33PM -0700, Bill Wendling wrote: >> As of today, there are two weeks left until we branch for the 3.0 >> release. Please get your changes in as soon as possible so that they >> are well-tested before the branch. And please keep on top of any failures you see. >> >> Now would be a good time to look through the bugzilla database to see >> if there are any issues you can address. :-) > > Is there a list of potential branch blockers? E.g. PR 10912 is a > crash-on-valid for Qt4 builds, which is kind of high profile.First, PR10912 looks like it was fixed in June. Second, we do not have branch blockers. We have release blockers which are defined in this document: http://llvm.org/docs/HowToReleaseLLVM.html#release-qualify Release blockers are fixed in TOT and the patches are applied to the branch. If we had a larger set of volunteers that could help qualify releases AND buildbots to continuously test the new release criteria, then we are willing to expand this criteria. We haven't had a lot of volunteers step up in this area though. -Tanya
Joerg Sonnenberger
2011-Oct-09 12:04 UTC
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Release: Two Weeks 'Til 3.0 Branch
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 04:45:33PM -0700, Bill Wendling wrote:> Now would be a good time to look through the bugzilla database to see > if there are any issues you can address. :-)I'll try to get attention to two issues. PR 10584 is an issue in Global Value Propogation and requires extreme amount of time (> 1h) and memory. This is from gambc. The second issue is PR 11090. Some issue in the Loop Strength Reduction that makes it eat > 8GB memory, no idea about the runtime. This is part of PHP 5.3, so kind of important. Joerg
Reasonably Related Threads
- [LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Release: Two Weeks 'Til 3.0 Branch
- [LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Release: Two Weeks 'Til 3.0 Branch
- [LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Release: Two Weeks 'Til 3.0 Branch
- [LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Release: Two Weeks 'Til 3.0 Branch
- [LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Release: Two Weeks 'Til 3.0 Branch