llvm dev - Sep 2011 - [LLVMdev] new dwarf tokens for AMDIL

The AMDIL Target needs new dwarf tokens for dwarf debug support, I'd we
should handle this best? (which numbers to use for the new tokens):

Two new tokens will be added:
DW_AT_AMDIL_address_space (currently 0x3ff1) : needed in order to know which
address space to read data from
DW_AT_AMDIL_resource (currently 0x3ff2) : the resource ID information for when
we read memory from UAV


---Yousef

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110915/93fcebe7/attachment.html>

Shajrawi, Yousef wrote:
>
>
> The AMDIL Target needs new dwarf tokens for dwarf debug support, I’d we
> should handle this best? (which numbers to use for the new tokens):
>
> Two new tokens will be added:
>
> DW_AT_AMDIL_address_space (currently 0x3ff1) : needed in order to know
> which address space to read data from
>
> DW_AT_AMDIL_resource (currently 0x3ff2) : the resource ID information
> for when we read memory from UAV
Does it make sense to go through http://www.dwarfstd.org/Issues.php 
first? Or do you expect this to be a long-lived LLVM extension with no 
intention of becoming standardized?

Nick

Thanks for the tip Nick, we will look into that.

Micah
> -----Original Message-----
> From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at
cs.uiuc.edu]
> On Behalf Of Nick Lewycky
> Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2011 1:48 AM
> To: Shajrawi, Yousef
> Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] new dwarf tokens for AMDIL
> 
> Shajrawi, Yousef wrote:
> >
> >
> > The AMDIL Target needs new dwarf tokens for dwarf debug support,
I'd
> we
> > should handle this best? (which numbers to use for the new tokens):
> >
> > Two new tokens will be added:
> >
> > DW_AT_AMDIL_address_space (currently 0x3ff1) : needed in order to
> know
> > which address space to read data from
> >
> > DW_AT_AMDIL_resource (currently 0x3ff2) : the resource ID information
> > for when we read memory from UAV
> 
> Does it make sense to go through http://www.dwarfstd.org/Issues.php
> first? Or do you expect this to be a long-lived LLVM extension with no
> intention of becoming standardized?
> 
> Nick
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev