While cleaning up 80col violations, I stumbled upon ggreif at my [!2464] find lib -name SimplifyCFG.cpp lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyCFG.cpp lib/Transforms/Scalar/SimplifyCFG.cpp I do not believe this is good, especially IDEs tend to confuse files with identical names coming from different directories. (CodeWarrior did.) Should we rename one of them? Cheers, Gabor
On May 14, 2008, at 6:31 AM, Gabor Greif wrote:> I do not believe this is good, especially IDEs tend to > confuse files with identical names coming from different > directories. (CodeWarrior did.)The question is, are there any left? If not, I'd leave it.
On Wed, 14 May 2008, Gabor Greif wrote:> While cleaning up 80col violations, I stumbled upon > > ggreif at my [!2464] find lib -name SimplifyCFG.cpp > lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyCFG.cpp > lib/Transforms/Scalar/SimplifyCFG.cpp > > > I do not believe this is good, especially IDEs tend to > confuse files with identical names coming from different > directories. (CodeWarrior did.) > > Should we rename one of them?I agree with mike that it hasn't been a problem so far and is unlikely to be one, but renaming is easy. Done: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20080512/062444.html -Chris -- http://nondot.org/sabre/ http://llvm.org/
Possibly Parallel Threads
- [LLVMdev] does llvm-gcc (4.2) build?
- [LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] Dealing with a corrupted /proc/self/exe link
- [LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] Dealing with a corrupted /proc/self/exe link
- [LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] Dealing with a corrupted /proc/self/exe link
- [LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] Dealing with a corrupted /proc/self/exe link