Seung Jae Lee
2008-Feb-21 17:53 UTC
[LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005?
I use VS2005/Vista, which works well... Thx, Seung ---- Original message ---->Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:02:29 +0800 >From: "Xi Wang" <xi.wang at gmail.com> >Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005? >To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > >Hi there, > >Did anyone try VS2008/Vista? There would a compile error (LLVM >2.1/2.2) at Line 126 in the file DynamicLibrary.inc. >// EnumerateLoadedModules(GetCurrentProcess(), ELM_Callback, 0); >Maybe MS changed the parameter type in the latest platform SDK. > >A simple workaround. At line 47 in the same file DynamicLibrary.inc, >// static BOOL CALLBACK ELM_Callback(PSTR ModuleName, ... >change PSTR to PCSTR, and everything is OK. > >I don't know if this works for VS2005/XP. > >Xi >_______________________________________________ >LLVM Developers mailing list >LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu >http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
Xi Wang
2008-Feb-22 04:36 UTC
[LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005?
I'm sorry but did you use Vista Platform SDK or just compile under Vista? Xi On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 1:53 AM, Seung Jae Lee <lee225 at uiuc.edu> wrote:> I use VS2005/Vista, which works well... > > Thx, > Seung
Maybe Matching Threads
- [LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005?
- [LLVMdev] DynamicLibrary.inc compile error /w vc++2005 and windows sdk 6.1
- [LLVMdev] LLVM 2.1 with VC++
- [LLVMdev] Is there someone tried LLVM 2.1 on Visual Studio 2005?
- [LLVMdev] [PATCH] LLVM 3.0 broken in lib/Support/Windows/DynamicLibrary.inc