hi> > i fixed some major bugs in the llvm-gcc4_2 patch since my last post. > > this brings me to an interesting question: > > > > what are your criteria to use my patch for further development? > > I have no fixed criteria. I think the best solution is for the work to be > checked into the (forthcoming) public SVN server. When it is available, > you can check it in there and we can all hack on it together. Even if it > has serious bugs or known deficiencies, I see no problem in that.ok, thats fine to me. i think the worst part of the work is done.> > at the moment i use the llvm-test1.9 suite for testing, because the > > actual llvm-test trunk in the repository seems to be broken. > > in my configuration the official llvm-gcc4 does not run completely error > > free against this suite (or is this my configuration fault?). > > so i guess a 100% error free run against the testsuite will not be the > > criteria. > > Hrm, that's strange. llvm-test doesn't pass 100% (e.g. some of the EH > stuff is now working yet), but it should ahve basic functionality. What > is broken? >major error causes: the sse.* tests produce errors during dagselection (see log) there is a problem when exception handling is used because all the __cxa.* functions are not found (bei llc and when compiling c-backend code) (i guess thats what you were refering to) and a few other failures i did not relate to this 2 groups for more information: here is a list of failures (53): http://geldspeicher.entenhausen.at/dl/failure_list.txt and here is the log of the above test run : http://geldspeicher.entenhausen.at/dl/testlog.txt.gz (36K) or http://geldspeicher.entenhausen.at/dl/testlog.txt (556K) (the test run is not complete, just what my computer could calc in one hour to check the sanity of th test) kind regards peter
On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 23:47 -0800, Chris Lattner wrote:> Very nice. Reid/Anton, do you guys have an idea when the svn server will > be available?Mid April. The SVN server is getting installed tomorrow. Anton and I are still testing the automated conversion script (almost there). We will probably make a beta svn server available (via my machine) for anyone that wants a preview. One of the things we have to do is also convert llvm-test and we haven't tested it much at all.> > -Chris >
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Peter Wiedermann wrote:> ok, thats fine to me. > i think the worst part of the work is done.wow, you look quite far along.>> Hrm, that's strange. llvm-test doesn't pass 100% (e.g. some of the EH >> stuff is now working yet), but it should ahve basic functionality. What >> is broken? >> > > major error causes: > > the sse.* tests produce errors during dagselection (see log) > > there is a problem when exception handling is used because > all the __cxa.* functions are not found (bei llc and when compiling c-backend code) (i guess thats what you were refering to) > > and a few other failures i did not relate to this 2 groupsRight, C++ EH is disabled in llvm-gcc at this point. Some of the failures do look real though, things like pointer_method, BuiltinTypeInfo, ofstream_ctor, etc. Very nice. Reid/Anton, do you guys have an idea when the svn server will be available? -Chris -- http://nondot.org/sabre/ http://llvm.org/