Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "__cxa".
Did you mean:
__cxa_
2007 Mar 28
2
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc4_2
...est doesn't pass 100% (e.g. some of the EH
> stuff is now working yet), but it should ahve basic functionality. What
> is broken?
>
major error causes:
the sse.* tests produce errors during dagselection (see log)
there is a problem when exception handling is used because
all the __cxa.* functions are not found (bei llc and when compiling c-backend code) (i guess thats what you were refering to)
and a few other failures i did not relate to this 2 groups
for more information:
here is a list of failures (53):
http://geldspeicher.entenhausen.at/dl/failure_list.txt
and here is t...
2007 Mar 30
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc4_2
...he EH
>> stuff is now working yet), but it should ahve basic functionality. What
>> is broken?
>>
>
> major error causes:
>
> the sse.* tests produce errors during dagselection (see log)
>
> there is a problem when exception handling is used because
> all the __cxa.* functions are not found (bei llc and when compiling c-backend code) (i guess thats what you were refering to)
>
> and a few other failures i did not relate to this 2 groups
Right, C++ EH is disabled in llvm-gcc at this point. Some of the failures
do look real though, things like pointer_...