> Hi, Chris, can you tell me why it should be
> dyn_cast<Instruction>(*i) instead of
> dyn_cast<Instruction>(&*i)? I remember when do the iteration
> on the basic block. We use code like this:
>
> for(BasicBlock::iterator i = b->begin(); ie = b->end(); i !> ie;
++i) {
> if (CallInst* callInst >
dyn_cast<CallInst>(&*i)) {
>
> Can you tell me why they are different?
BasicBlock::iterator and Value::use_iterator are different types.
Dereferencing a BasicBlock::iterator returns a reference to an
instruction, dereferencing a Value::use_iterator returns a pointer to the
use.
-Chris
http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/
http://www.nondot.org/~sabre/Projects/
