Hi,
There is no change in the compiler flags. I'm using as it is from the
original code. No change in the Makefile and I believe it is using the
floating point only by default.
We are using 8k samples and mono so the commands is as follows.
[root at MEDIA opus-1.1]# ./opus_demo -d 8000 1 opus_encoded_crash.opus
opus_encoded_crash.pcm
*And segmentation is as below..*.
............
Calling opus_decode123. len[toggle]:79, output_samples:96000
data[0] = 78
data[0] = 78
78 87 46 18 4f fe a6 be 7d 8 6 33 e2 79 ee e4 71 55 a7 3a 8 c9 48 d6 a7
20 3b 7 95 18 b8 4b 8f 24 fa a6 50 87 97 9c d7 13 d0 b2 c3 c4 6d 2f 8b 6c
13 6f bb 16 cc 20 85 4e c7 5d 2e 90 41 ae 47 8b 3e 36 eb c7 c8 28 94 3 c3
f9 52 aa 84 output_samples ==<160>
Calling opus_decode123. len[toggle]:89, output_samples:96000
data[0] = 78
data[0] = 78
78 87 29 db 92 15 9c 94 bf b8 cd 23 22 ab bf bf 48 26 52 21 26 b5 b2 d5 4d
7c 6f 8f ec 65 d2 2c 2 30 7f 81 dc 4 9c 10 82 5f e7 ff 62 4e ec d4 ac 16
9a 4d a9 49 67 86 e7 c a8 6c a5 4f 45 2f 95 b0 71 32 fb b6 fb 72 fd 25 f5
40 65 df 4e 5d 8c 2d 84 8e 17 c6 67 12 5f output_samples ==<160>
Calling opus_decode123. len[toggle]:3, output_samples:96000
*data[0] = f8*
*data[0] = f8*
*Segmentation fault*
[root at MEDIA opus-1.1]#
Whereas if I run the same in 1.1.1, this is the output and i'm able to play
the pcm file
[root at MEDIA opus-1.1]#./opus_demo -d 8000 1 opus_encoded_crash.opus
opus_encoded_crash.pcm
libopus 1.1.1-beta
Decoding with 8000 Hz output (1 channels)
average bitrate: 31.864 kb/s
maximum bitrate: 49.200 kb/s
bitrate standard deviation: 3.412 kb/s
[root at MEDIA opus-1.1]#
*compiler flags in 1.1:*
AWK = gawk
CC = gcc -std=gnu99
CCAS = gcc -std=gnu99
CCASDEPMODE = depmode=gcc3
CCASFLAGS = -g -O2
CCDEPMODE = depmode=gcc3
CFLAGS = -g -O2 -fvisibility=hidden -W -Wall -Wextra -Wcast-align
-Wnested-externs -Wshadow -Wstrict-prototypes
CPP = gcc -E
CPPFLAGS CYGPATH_W = echo
DEFS = -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
DEPDIR = .deps
DLLTOOL = false
But If i run the same command you did (./opus_demo -d 48000 2
opus_encoded_crash.opus out.pcm) also crashed (same). Do I need to change
any Makefile setting based on my system configuration? What is your system
config?
*This is my system config:*
model name :* Intel(R) *Core(TM) i3 CPU 540 @ 3.07GHz
Thanks
Suresh
On 21 April 2015 at 07:45, Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin at jmvalin.ca> wrote:
> I just tried decoding with v1.1:
> ./opus_demo -d 48000 2 opus_encoded_crash.opus out.pcm
>
> and I see no issue (including with valgrind). Does the same command-line
> create problems for you? What compile flags did you use? fixed-point or
> float, any assembly, ...? Could be assembly here, or even a compiler bug
> wouldn't be unheard of.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jean-Marc
>
>
> On 20/04/15 07:27 AM, Suresh Thiriveedi wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We are able to reproduce the issue with the 1.1 opus_demo (sample
file).
> > We captured the frames in our server just before the opus_decode and
fed
> > the file to opus_demo (1.1) and it is crashing. Same file is tested
with
> > 1.1.1 and it is fine. So this is in line with our server testing
> > observation and I think here we can conclude that the 1.1 library is
> > crashing while handling a specific mode frame as explained in my
earlier
> > mail.
> >
> > Here I'm attaching the captured opus encoded file which is causing
the
> > crash.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Suresh
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 17 April 2015 at 02:27, Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin at jmvalin.ca
> > <mailto:jmvalin at jmvalin.ca>> wrote:
> >
> > To be decodable by opus_demo, you'll have to add the 8-byte
"header".
> > Just put in the length of the packet followed by "0" for
the encoder
> > range (0 means "not present").
> >
> > That being said, from previous experience, the most likely cause
of
> the
> > crash is a bug in your software causing a corruption in Opus. So
it's
> > safe to assume that if you can't reproduce the bug using
opus_demo,
> then
> > that's indeed the case.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Jean-Marc
> >
> > On 16/04/15 08:32 AM, Suresh Thiriveedi wrote:
> > > This is observed on a live call between webRTC browser client
and
> > > another legacy client. Our server is there in between and
> transcoding
> > > from opus to another codec and this is observed while
decoding the
> opus.
> > >
> > > Anyway, I'll try to capture/dump the packets in the
server before
> > > feeding to the opus_decode and share with you. But this will
not
> have
> > > the first 8 bytes (length+enc range) to directly feed to the
sample
> > > binary. Please let me know if this is fine.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Suresh
> > >
> > > On 16 April 2015 at 17:36, Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin at
jmvalin.ca
> <mailto:jmvalin at jmvalin.ca>
> > > <mailto:jmvalin at jmvalin.ca <mailto:jmvalin at
jmvalin.ca>>> wrote:
> > >
> > > Please provide the input file that produces this with
> opus_demo.
> > >
> > > On 16/04/15 03:24 AM, Suresh Thiriveedi wrote:
> > > > Hi Jean-Marc,
> > > >
> > > > Could you please update if you got a chance to look
into. As
> I
> > > > mentioned, I don't see the same issue in 1.1.1,
but I don't
> see any
> > > > difference in 1.1.1 other than optimization based on
the
> architecture.
> > > > This optimization could have fixed some stack
overflow issue
> in some
> > > > specific cases?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > > Suresh
> > > >
> > > > On 13 April 2015 at 12:39, Suresh Thiriveedi <
> sthiriveedi at gmail.com <mailto:sthiriveedi at gmail.com>
> > <mailto:sthiriveedi at gmail.com <mailto:sthiriveedi at
gmail.com>>
> > > > <mailto:sthiriveedi at gmail.com
<mailto:sthiriveedi at gmail.com>
> > <mailto:sthiriveedi at gmail.com <mailto:sthiriveedi at
gmail.com>>>>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Jean-Marc,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for your response. Please find the
details as
> below.
> > > >
> > > > *_Backtrace we got for this crash:_*
> > > >
> > > > #0 0x0000000000800c54 in opus_decode_frame
> > (st=0x38906b8f99d09c5,
> > > >
> > > > data=0xf0aa10b4ef1008ae <Address
0xf0aa10b4ef1008ae
> > out of
> > > > bounds>, len=-188613428,
pcm=0x6e80016085efd57,
> > > >
> > > > frame_size=44037315, decode_fec=58716895) at
> > > src/opus_decoder.c:384
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #1 0x00000000008009c0 in opus_decode_frame
> (st=0x712357d0,
> > > >
> > > > data=0x7effff9ab72d
> > > >
> > >
> >
"~?`\\?K\005??y?w+g~?S2\025?\036T?\002x??h!???\220\233\066s?\030#gb
> > > >
\rn?rF\005Q?\213;?`\207$O?(m\222=9??/h??t??E?w?\237\"
> > \206z\005
> > > > \213?u at e", len=88, pcm=0x7effff9a6a80,
frame_size=640,
> > > decode_fec=0)
> > > > at src/opus_decoder.c:319
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #2 0x0000000000801be1 in opus_decode_native
> (st=0x712357d0,
> > > >
> > > > data=0x7effff9ab72d
> > > >
> > >
> >
"~?`\\?K\005??y?w+g~?S2\025?\036T?\002x??h!???\220\233\066s?\030#gb
> > > >
\rn?rF\005Q?\213;?`\207$O?(m\222=9??/h??t??E?w?\237\"
> > \206z\005
> > > > \213?u at e", len=89, pcm=0x7effff9a6a80,
frame_size=640,
> > > decode_fec=0,
> > > > self_delimited=0,
> > > >
> > > > packet_offset=0x0, soft_clip=1) at
> > src/opus_decoder.c:681
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #3 0x000000000080226c in opus_decode
(st=0x712357d0,
> > > >
> > > > data=0x7effff9ab72c
> > > >
> > >
> >
"?~?`\\?K\005??y?w+g~?S2\025?\036T?\002x??h!???\220\233\066s?\030#gb
> > > >
\rn?rF\005Q?\213;?`\207$O?(m\222=9??/h??t??E?w?\237\"
> > \206z\005
> > > > \213?u at e", len=89, pcm=0x71245a60,
frame_size=640,
> > > decode_fec=0) at
> > > > src/opus_decoder.c:867
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #4 0x00000000004fd6b5 in kn_opus_decode
> > (decHandle=0x712357d0,
> > > > decProp=0x1675698, src=0x16756d0,
dest=0x71245a60,
> > > >
> > > > dstLen=0x1673210) at MSTranscodeOPUS.c:100
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > *_And the code flow what we have observed for
this
> specific
> > > incident:_*
> > > > *_
> > > > _*
> > > > *_Called this as mode is CELT_ONLY,_*
> > > >
> > > > if (data!=NULL && st->prev_mode
> 0 && (
> > > > (mode == MODE_CELT_ONLY &&
st->prev_mode !> > MODE_CELT_ONLY &&
> > > > !st->prev_redundancy)
> > > > || (mode != MODE_CELT_ONLY &&
st->prev_mode => > MODE_CELT_ONLY) )
> > > > )
> > > > {
> > > > _transition = 1_;
> > > > /* Decide where to allocate the stack
memory for
> > pcm_transition */
> > > > if (mode == MODE_CELT_ONLY)
> > > > pcm_transition_celt_size =
F5*st->channels;
> > > > else
> > > > pcm_transition_silk_size =
F5*st->channels;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > *_So transition is made as 1 called this,_*
> > > >
> > > > if (transition && mode ==
MODE_CELT_ONLY)
> > > > {
> > > > pcm_transition = pcm_transition_celt;
> > > > opus_decode_frame(st, NULL, 0,
pcm_transition,
> > IMIN(F5,
> > > > audiosize), 0);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > *_In "opus_decode_frame" again, as
data is passed as
> > NULL, goes to
> > > > else part_*
> > > >
> > > > if (data != NULL)
> > > > {
> > > > audiosize = st->frame_size;
> > > > mode = st->mode;
> > > > ec_dec_init(&dec,(unsigned
char*)data,len);
> > > > } else {
> > > > audiosize = frame_size;
> > > > mode = st->prev_mode;
> > > >
> > > > *_As the mode is made as prev mode now, which
was a
> > silk, this
> > > goes
> > > > inside,_*
> > > >
> > > > /* SILK processing */
> > > > if (mode != MODE_CELT_ONLY)
> > > > {
> > > >
> > > > *_Then in this function called this_*,
> > > >
> > > > silk_ret = silk_Decode( silk_dec,
> &st->DecControl,
> > > > lost_flag,
first_frame,
> > &dec,
> > > > pcm_ptr, &silk_frame_size );
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > *_And finally, somehow, the
"silk_frame_size" is a
> negative
> > > value (
> > > > say -1376272 in our case), then in the same
function
> > called the
> > > > below and this crashes here._*
> > > >
> > > > pcm_ptr += silk_frame_size * st->channels;
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Please help.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > > Suresh
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 12 April 2015 at 21:23, Jean-Marc Valin
> > <jmvalin at jmvalin.ca <mailto:jmvalin at jmvalin.ca>
> > <mailto:jmvalin at jmvalin.ca <mailto:jmvalin at
jmvalin.ca>>
> > > > <mailto:jmvalin at jmvalin.ca
<mailto:jmvalin at jmvalin.ca>
> > <mailto:jmvalin at jmvalin.ca <mailto:jmvalin at
jmvalin.ca>>>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Do you have any file that demonstrates the
problem
> with either
> > > > opus_demo
> > > > or opusdec?
> > > >
> > > > Jean-Marc
> > > >
> > > > On 09/04/15 04:01 AM, Suresh Thiriveedi
wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm curious to know when would be
the 1.1.1 stable
> version
> > > > available.
> > > > >
> > > > > In 1.1, we are facing crash when opus
library is
> trying to
> > > > decode the
> > > > > CELT-only, full band and 20 ms. So we
tried with
> 1.1.1 beta
> > > > and it looks
> > > > > to be fine. Is there any open issue
regarding this
> in 1.1 version?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > > Suresh
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
_______________________________________________
> > > > > opus mailing list
> > > > > opus at xiph.org <mailto:opus at
xiph.org> <mailto:
> opus at xiph.org
> > <mailto:opus at xiph.org>>
> > > <mailto:opus at xiph.org <mailto:opus at
xiph.org>
> > <mailto:opus at xiph.org <mailto:opus at
xiph.org>>>
> > > > >
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/opus
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/opus/attachments/20150421/4d313c63/attachment-0001.htm