search for: sthiriveedi

...> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > Suresh > > > > > > > > > > On 13 April 2015 at 12:39, Suresh Thiriveedi > > <sthiriveedi at gmail.com <mailto:sthiriveedi at gmail.com> > > <mailto:sthiriveedi at gmail.com <mailto:sthiriveedi at gmail.com>> > > > <mailto:sthiriveedi at gmail.com <mailto:sthiriveedi at gmail.com> > > <mailto:sthiriveedi at gmail.com &lt...

...issue > in some > > > > specific cases? > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > Suresh > > > > > > > > On 13 April 2015 at 12:39, Suresh Thiriveedi < > sthiriveedi at gmail.com <mailto:sthiriveedi at gmail.com> > > <mailto:sthiriveedi at gmail.com <mailto:sthiriveedi at gmail.com>> > > > > <mailto:sthiriveedi at gmail.com <mailto:sthiriveedi at gmail.com> > > <mailto:sthiriveedi at gmail.co...

...; > > specific cases? > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > Suresh > > > > > > > > On 13 April 2015 at 12:39, Suresh Thiriveedi > <sthiriveedi at gmail.com <mailto:sthiriveedi at gmail.com> > <mailto:sthiriveedi at gmail.com <mailto:sthiriveedi at gmail.com>> > > <mailto:sthiriveedi at gmail.com <mailto:sthiriveedi at gmail.com> > <mailto:sthiriveedi at gmail.com <mailto:sthiriv...

...2650 0 @ 2.00GHz No Crash 172.27.5.231 CFLAGS = -g -O0 5.3 2.6.18-128.el5 4.1.2 Intel(R) Core(TM) i3 CPU 540 @ 3.07GHz No Crash With any other optimization flags (1,2,3), it is crashing in all the above servers. Thanks Suresh On 21 April 2015 at 14:17, Suresh Thiriveedi <sthiriveedi at gmail.com> wrote: > > Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.4 (Santiago) > gcc version 4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-3) (GCC) > > We see the issue in all our Intel based Linux servers. > > Thanks > Suresh > > > > On 21 April 2015 at 12:41, Jean-Marc Va...

...optimization based on the architecture. > > This optimization could have fixed some stack overflow issue in some > > specific cases? > > > > > > Thanks > > Suresh > > > > On 13 April 2015 at 12:39, Suresh Thiriveedi <sthiriveedi at gmail.com <mailto:sthiriveedi at gmail.com> > > <mailto:sthiriveedi at gmail.com <mailto:sthiriveedi at gmail.com>>> wrote: > > > > Hi Jean-Marc, > > > > Thanks for your response. Please find the details as below. &gt...

...mization could have fixed some stack overflow issue in some > > > specific cases? > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > Suresh > > > > > > On 13 April 2015 at 12:39, Suresh Thiriveedi <sthiriveedi at gmail.com <mailto:sthiriveedi at gmail.com> > <mailto:sthiriveedi at gmail.com <mailto:sthiriveedi at gmail.com>> > > > <mailto:sthiriveedi at gmail.com <mailto:sthiriveedi at gmail.com> > <mailto:sthiriveedi at gmail.com <mailto:st...

...> This optimization could have fixed some stack overflow issue in > some > > > specific cases? > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > Suresh > > > > > > On 13 April 2015 at 12:39, Suresh Thiriveedi < > sthiriveedi at gmail.com <mailto:sthiriveedi at gmail.com> > > > <mailto:sthiriveedi at gmail.com <mailto:sthiriveedi at gmail.com>>> > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Jean-Marc, > > > > > > Thanks for your response. Please...

...n 1.1.1, but I don't see any > difference in 1.1.1 other than optimization based on the architecture. > This optimization could have fixed some stack overflow issue in some > specific cases? > > > Thanks > Suresh > > On 13 April 2015 at 12:39, Suresh Thiriveedi <sthiriveedi at gmail.com > <mailto:sthiriveedi at gmail.com>> wrote: > > Hi Jean-Marc, > > Thanks for your response. Please find the details as below. > > *_Backtrace we got for this crash:_* > > #0 0x0000000000800c54 in opus_decode_frame (st=0x38906b8f9...

Hi, When we pass around 9K samples of only ambient noise (no voice), the encoder which is enabled FEC+DTX is detecting only some 140 frames as non-voice (returning only TOC, no frame content). We were expecting all or more to be identified as non-voice. Our idea was to check how the decoder re-generates the original ambient noise during the silence duration (when we feed NULL to decoder) when

...difference in 1.1.1 other than optimization based on the architecture. > > This optimization could have fixed some stack overflow issue in some > > specific cases? > > > > > > Thanks > > Suresh > > > > On 13 April 2015 at 12:39, Suresh Thiriveedi <sthiriveedi at gmail.com > > <mailto:sthiriveedi at gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > Hi Jean-Marc, > > > > Thanks for your response. Please find the details as below. > > > > *_Backtrace we got for this crash:_* > > > > #0 0x000000000080...

Hi Jean-Marc, Thanks for your response. Please find the details as below. *Backtrace we got for this crash:* #0 0x0000000000800c54 in opus_decode_frame (st=0x38906b8f99d09c5, data=0xf0aa10b4ef1008ae <Address 0xf0aa10b4ef1008ae out of bounds>, len=-188613428, pcm=0x6e80016085efd57, frame_size=44037315, decode_fec=58716895) at src/opus_decoder.c:384 #1 0x00000000008009c0 in

Hi, I changed the VAD sensitivity by varying VAD_SNR_FACTOR_Q16 and now it shows the difference in silence frames. Thanks Suresh On 4 October 2016 at 17:57, Suresh Thiriveedi <sthiriveedi at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > When we pass around 9K samples of only ambient noise (no voice), the > encoder which is enabled FEC+DTX is detecting only some 140 frames as > non-voice (returning only TOC, no frame content). We were expecting all or > more to be identified as n...

...I mentioned, I don't see the same issue in 1.1.1, but I don't see any difference in 1.1.1 other than optimization based on the architecture. This optimization could have fixed some stack overflow issue in some specific cases? Thanks Suresh On 13 April 2015 at 12:39, Suresh Thiriveedi <sthiriveedi at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Jean-Marc, > > Thanks for your response. Please find the details as below. > > *Backtrace we got for this crash:* > > #0 0x0000000000800c54 in opus_decode_frame (st=0x38906b8f99d09c5, > > data=0xf0aa10b4ef1008ae <Address 0xf0aa10b4ef1...

Hi, I'm curious to know when would be the 1.1.1 stable version available. In 1.1, we are facing crash when opus library is trying to decode the CELT-only, full band and 20 ms. So we tried with 1.1.1 beta and it looks to be fine. Is there any open issue regarding this in 1.1 version? Thanks Suresh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: