opus - Oct 2013 - Unknown versions in git.

> 
> Are you sure??
No, I'm confused.
:-/

With shallow clones:-
opus
PACKAGE_VERSION="aee4d80"
opus-tools
PACKAGE_VERSION="7c3f522"


Something's gone wrong.

opus-tools is broken.

configure: error: Package requirements (opus>= 1.0.3) were not met:
Requested 'opus>= 1.0.3' but version of Opus is aee4d80

On 2013-10-01 5:27 PM, bat guano wrote:
> opus-tools is broken.
> 
> configure: error: Package requirements (opus>= 1.0.3) were not met:
> Requested 'opus>= 1.0.3' but version of Opus is aee4d80
"You're in the bottom of a well, surrounded by yaks."

Well, I'm back to keeping a hard-coded fallback version string in the
repo. Anyone else?

 -r

I vote for "don't clone with depth 1". There's no way
we're going to
catch all of these anyway.

	Jean-Marc

On 10/02/2013 12:47 AM, Ralph Giles wrote:
> On 2013-10-01 5:27 PM, bat guano wrote:
> 
>> opus-tools is broken.
>>
>> configure: error: Package requirements (opus>= 1.0.3) were not met:
>> Requested 'opus>= 1.0.3' but version of Opus is aee4d80
> 
> "You're in the bottom of a well, surrounded by yaks."
> 
> Well, I'm back to keeping a hard-coded fallback version string in the
> repo. Anyone else?
> 
>  -r
> _______________________________________________
> opus mailing list
> opus at xiph.org
> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/opus
>