bugzilla-daemon at netfilter.org
2016-Mar-21 12:56 UTC
[Bug 1059] New: Using wildcard interface names in an anonymous set fails on big endian
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1059 Bug ID: 1059 Summary: Using wildcard interface names in an anonymous set fails on big endian Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: ppc OS: other Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org Reporter: magnus.oberg at westermo.se I'm running on a PPC platform, big endian. I'm getting this error at run-time: /var/run/nftables.rules:10:6-12: Error: Byteorder mismatch: expected big endian, got host endian iifname { "vlan1", "vi-vlan1_*" } ip daddr 33.44.5.6/32 ip protocol 6 tcp dport 222 accept ^^^^^^^ It appears when using a wildcard interface string in an inline set. The error is raised in byteorder_conversion() called from expr_evaluate_relational() in evaluate.c. Inside the OP_LOOKUP case, row 1232. The string should in host byte order, but that is not expected for the lookup (due to the prefix_expr_alloc()?) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter-buglog/attachments/20160321/ff4b1368/attachment.html>
bugzilla-daemon at netfilter.org
2017-Mar-24 01:19 UTC
[Bug 1059] Using wildcard interface names in an anonymous set fails on big endian
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1059 Phil Sutter <phil at nwl.cc> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |phil at nwl.cc --- Comment #1 from Phil Sutter <phil at nwl.cc> --- This is not only an issue on big endian systems, little endian is affected as well. Actually, this is a missing feature as mentioned in commit b851ba4731d9f7c5e38889875a83173fcc4d3f16: "Wildcard strings are not supported from sets and maps yet. Error reporting is not very good at this stage since expr_evaluate_prefix() doesn't have enough context (ctx->set is NULL, the set object is currently created later after evaluating the lhs and rhs of the relational)." -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter-buglog/attachments/20170324/5b068e0d/attachment.html>
bugzilla-daemon at netfilter.org
2017-Mar-24 01:20 UTC
[Bug 1059] RFE: allow wildcard strings in sets (and maps)
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1059 Phil Sutter <phil at nwl.cc> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hardware|ppc |All Summary|Using wildcard interface |RFE: allow wildcard strings |names in an anonymous set |in sets (and maps) |fails on big endian | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter-buglog/attachments/20170324/45268137/attachment.html>
bugzilla-daemon at netfilter.org
2020-Jan-29 00:07 UTC
[Bug 1059] RFE: allow wildcard strings in sets (and maps)
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1059 kfm at plushkava.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kfm at plushkava.net -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter-buglog/attachments/20200129/a41824f0/attachment-0001.html>
Seemingly Similar Threads
- [Bug 1059] scp should have an option to ignore symlinks
- CESA-2009:1059 Important CentOS 3 i386 pidgin - security update
- CESA-2009:1059 Important CentOS 3 x86_64 pidgin - security update
- CESA-2009:1059 Important CentOS 3 ia64 pidgin - security update
- CESA-2009:1059 Important CentOS 3 s390(x) pidgin - security update