bugzilla-daemon at netfilter.org
2014-Nov-07 16:07 UTC
[Bug 986] New: ulogd fails to build against linux headers >= 3.17.0 due to ULOG target removal
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=986 Bug ID: 986 Summary: ulogd fails to build against linux headers >= 3.17.0 due to ULOG target removal Product: ulogd Version: SVN (please provide timestamp) Hardware: x86_64 OS: Gentoo Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: ulogd Assignee: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org Reporter: itumaykin at gmail.com Hello. ULOG target was removed since 3.17.0 kernel release. See: http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=7200135bc1e61f1437dc326ae2ef2f310c50b4eb Currently, ulogd has no option to be built without ULOG support. This results in build failures when ulogd is built against linux headers >= 3.17.0. However, ulogd built against older linux headers runs fine on >=3.17.0 active kernels. Stacks that use ULOG target, of course, don't work in this case. All ulogd2 versions are affected by this issue. Please make ULOG support optional the same way it is with NFCT, NFLOG and NFACCT. Related Gentoo bug report: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=528310 Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter-buglog/attachments/20141107/1c6167cc/attachment.html>
bugzilla-daemon at netfilter.org
2014-Nov-07 17:39 UTC
[Bug 986] ulogd fails to build against linux headers >= 3.17.0 due to ULOG target removal
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=986 Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo at netfilter.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pablo at netfilter.org --- Comment #1 from Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo at netfilter.org> --- Created attachment 454 --> https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/attachment.cgi?id=454&action=edit fix ulogd2 compilation with >= 3.17 kernels -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter-buglog/attachments/20141107/c97e30d9/attachment.html>
bugzilla-daemon at netfilter.org
2014-Nov-07 17:40 UTC
[Bug 986] ulogd fails to build against linux headers >= 3.17.0 due to ULOG target removal
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=986 Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo at netfilter.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo at netfilter.org> --- Please, give a try to the patch attached, I'll push it to master once you confirm this resolves the issue. Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter-buglog/attachments/20141107/0029ad82/attachment.html>
bugzilla-daemon at netfilter.org
2014-Nov-14 15:16 UTC
[Bug 986] ulogd fails to build against linux headers >= 3.17.0 due to ULOG target removal
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=986 --- Comment #3 from Coacher <itumaykin at gmail.com> --- (In reply to Pablo Neira Ayuso from comment #2)> Please, give a try to the patch attached, I'll push it to master once you > confirm this resolves the issue. Thanks.I can confirm that current master (i.e. 4f267553aede76dc91133ba88c69f8b8faf00b72) builds fine against linux headers 3.17 with active kernel 3.17.2. Thanks. Though ULOG-enabled stacks are not working with message from ulogd: '<7> ulogd_inppkt_ULOG.c:288 Can't create ULOG handle'. Certainly, they are not expected to work with kernel >= 3.17.0. Still, it would be nice to have a possibility to build ulogd without ULOG support at all. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter-buglog/attachments/20141114/9b1aa95e/attachment.html>
bugzilla-daemon at netfilter.org
2014-Nov-14 16:30 UTC
[Bug 986] ulogd fails to build against linux headers >= 3.17.0 due to ULOG target removal
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=986 --- Comment #4 from Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo at netfilter.org> --- (In reply to Coacher from comment #3)> (In reply to Pablo Neira Ayuso from comment #2) > > Please, give a try to the patch attached, I'll push it to master once you > > confirm this resolves the issue. Thanks. > > I can confirm that current master (i.e. > 4f267553aede76dc91133ba88c69f8b8faf00b72) builds fine against linux headers > 3.17 with active kernel 3.17.2. Thanks.Does this mean my patch solved your problem? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter-buglog/attachments/20141114/b85e3839/attachment.html>
bugzilla-daemon at netfilter.org
2014-Nov-14 16:31 UTC
[Bug 986] ulogd fails to build against linux headers >= 3.17.0 due to ULOG target removal
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=986 --- Comment #5 from Coacher <itumaykin at gmail.com> --- (In reply to Pablo Neira Ayuso from comment #4)> (In reply to Coacher from comment #3) > > (In reply to Pablo Neira Ayuso from comment #2) > > > Please, give a try to the patch attached, I'll push it to master once you > > > confirm this resolves the issue. Thanks. > > > > I can confirm that current master (i.e. > > 4f267553aede76dc91133ba88c69f8b8faf00b72) builds fine against linux headers > > 3.17 with active kernel 3.17.2. Thanks. > > Does this mean my patch solved your problem?Yes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter-buglog/attachments/20141114/bd9ad1e1/attachment.html>
bugzilla-daemon at netfilter.org
2014-Nov-14 16:35 UTC
[Bug 986] ulogd fails to build against linux headers >= 3.17.0 due to ULOG target removal
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=986 Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo at netfilter.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #6 from Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo at netfilter.org> --- (In reply to Coacher from comment #5)> (In reply to Pablo Neira Ayuso from comment #4) > > (In reply to Coacher from comment #3) > > > (In reply to Pablo Neira Ayuso from comment #2) > > > > Please, give a try to the patch attached, I'll push it to master once you > > > > confirm this resolves the issue. Thanks. > > > > > > I can confirm that current master (i.e. > > > 4f267553aede76dc91133ba88c69f8b8faf00b72) builds fine against linux headers > > > 3.17 with active kernel 3.17.2. Thanks. > > > > Does this mean my patch solved your problem? > > Yes.Thank you, pushed mainstream. I'd appreciate if you can send us a patch to disable ulog support at compile time to netfilter-devel at vger.kernel.org, no objection to such configure time option. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter-buglog/attachments/20141114/410463c2/attachment.html>
bugzilla-daemon at netfilter.org
2014-Nov-14 16:37 UTC
[Bug 986] ulogd fails to build against linux headers >= 3.17.0 due to ULOG target removal
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=986 --- Comment #7 from Coacher <itumaykin at gmail.com> --- (In reply to Pablo Neira Ayuso from comment #6)> Thank you, pushed mainstream.Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter-buglog/attachments/20141114/b6578592/attachment.html>
Possibly Parallel Threads
- [Bug 793] New: ulogd -d does not close all fds
- ULOG logging may fail on some ulogd/logrotate configurations
- [ANNOUNCE] problems with recent ULOG patch and old ulogd
- [ulog 1.24] wrong version and no log in ulogd.log
- [Bug 748] New: Range check for ulog-cprange is wrong