Alex & Mario, I uploaded the OS X gem, I am unable to download it. Keep getting 404 Not Found errors. It seems like the file has not been spread out to the mirrors. Can one of you try it out and see if it is working? If not can Alex just remove it and I will try again later after work. Thanks Sean
Now it seems to be working, still can you guys give it a shot to make sure. Sean On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 7:47 AM, Sean Long <sean.m.long at gmail.com> wrote:> Alex & Mario, > > I uploaded the OS X gem, I am unable to download it. Keep getting 404 > Not Found errors. > > It seems like the file has not been spread out to the mirrors. > > Can one of you try it out and see if it is working? If not can Alex > just remove it and I will try again later after work. > > Thanks > > Sean >
Seems all good to me. I''ll try actually installing it later when I''m home thanks alex Sean Long wrote:> Alex & Mario, > > I uploaded the OS X gem, I am unable to download it. Keep getting 404 > Not Found errors. > > It seems like the file has not been spread out to the mirrors. > > Can one of you try it out and see if it is working? If not can Alex > just remove it and I will try again later after work. > > Thanks > > Sean > _______________________________________________ > wxruby-development mailing list > wxruby-development at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wxruby-development >
Sean Long wrote:> Now it seems to be working, still can you guys give it a shot to make sure. >But it''s still not showing up for installation via the ''gem'' command. I raised a bug about this with rubygems but they turned it down: --- Date: 2008-02-23 16:40 Message: The gem is misnamed. It needs to be uploaded with the full name it has internally which is ''wxruby-1.9.4-universal-darwin-9''. --- But we don''t do anything to change the name of the gem do we in the wxRuby rakefile? If so it is a bug if it produces a gem that the indexer later can''t understand. alex
When I created the gem it named it ''wxruby-1.9.5-universal-darwin-9'', I removed the -9 just as I had with the previous 1.9.4 release. Maybe that is the problem. I am at work currently and our internet connection does not work with the ssl on rubyforge.net so I can not update anything until tonight. Sean On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 8:41 AM, Alex Fenton <alex at pressure.to> wrote:> Sean Long wrote: > > Now it seems to be working, still can you guys give it a shot to make sure. > > > But it''s still not showing up for installation via the ''gem'' command. I > raised a bug about this with rubygems but they turned it down: > --- > > Date: 2008-02-23 16:40 > > Message: > The gem is misnamed. > > It needs to be uploaded with the full name it has internally which is ''wxruby-1.9.4-universal-darwin-9''. > --- > > But we don''t do anything to change the name of the gem do we in the wxRuby rakefile? If so it is a bug if it produces a gem that the indexer later can''t understand. > > alex > > > > > _______________________________________________ > wxruby-development mailing list > wxruby-development at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wxruby-development >
Sean Long wrote:> When I created the gem it named it ''wxruby-1.9.5-universal-darwin-9'', > I removed the -9 just as I had with the previous 1.9.4 release. Maybe > that is the problem.I think so possibly. Sorry I should have forwarded Eric''s follow-up to the bug earlier. I''ve re-uploaded under the name with -9 suffix; hopefully it should now get picked up by Rubyforge gem indexer. alex
Thanks Alex. Guess that is what I get for trying to make it look pretty. I still don''t get why the 1.9.4 release did not have the same problem. Sean On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 2:08 PM, Alex Fenton <alex at pressure.to> wrote:> Sean Long wrote: > > When I created the gem it named it ''wxruby-1.9.5-universal-darwin-9'', > > I removed the -9 just as I had with the previous 1.9.4 release. Maybe > > that is the problem. > I think so possibly. Sorry I should have forwarded Eric''s follow-up to > the bug earlier. I''ve re-uploaded under the name with -9 suffix; > hopefully it should now get picked up by Rubyforge gem indexer. > > > > alex > > _______________________________________________ > wxruby-development mailing list > wxruby-development at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wxruby-development >
Sean Long wrote:> Thanks Alex. Guess that is what I get for trying to make it look pretty. > > I still don''t get why the 1.9.4 release did not have the same problem. >I think it did which is when I reported the bug. It just took forever for the rubygems team to get back to us. Thanks for doing the build btw. Just uploading the AMD-64 linux now alex