On Jun 19, 2013, at 10:07 AM, Jeroen van der Ham <jeroen@dckd.nl> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 19 Jun 2013, at 14:44, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com>
wrote:
>
>> On 19/06/13 14:33, Jeroen van der Ham wrote:
>>>
>>> On 19 Jun 2013, at 14:20, Roger Pau Monné
<roger.pau@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>> That''s because Justin recently pushed a commit that
changed the ad
>>>> translation to ada, you should change your /etc/fstab to
ada0p2. It''s
>>>> commit 526f3ad11acb296481215d7c2915b3f30f1844f6.
>>>
>>>
>>> Ah, you may want to update the wiki page also to warn for that. :)
>>
>> D''oh, I''ve completely forgot about the wiki page,
it''s updated now,
>> thanks for the pointer.
>
> Okay, everything works again now.
Should we encourage folks to just configure their VMs to use xbd? I hope some
day that the system will just report "da" devices, so the ada name may
change again. We could also suggest specifying SCSI disks in the VM config
since I don''t think "da" will ever change.
> Additionally, I''ve applied the patches from FreeBSD-SA-13:06.mmap,
rebuilt the kernel and rebooted, and the system now works fine.
>
> I did note however that rebuilding the kernel takes an awful lot more time
than on a FreeBSD9 system. As in it took about 2 hours longer.
>
> Jeroen.
I''ve never seen a kernel build take 2 hours, much less 2 hours
*longer*. Are you talking about buildworld? It would be interesting to know
your results building stable/9 sources in your 10 environment to see if this is
just due to "build bloat" or a true performance regression.
--
Justin