HTB versus HFSC, both qdisc offer the same kind of service, if you want to see comparative test results, go to http://www.rawsoft.org at the line "TEST RESULTS" you will find the results for a sharing test and a burst test. You will see that both qdisc are good. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
On Thursday 24 June 2004 13:21, Vincent Perrier wrote:> HTB versus HFSC, both qdisc offer the same kind of service, > if you want to see comparative test results, go to > http://www.rawsoft.org > at the line "TEST RESULTS" you will find the results for > a sharing test and a burst test. > You will see that both qdisc are good.Excellent information! Thanks! _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Vincent Perrier wrote:> HTB versus HFSC, both qdisc offer the same kind of service, > if you want to see comparative test results, go to > http://www.rawsoft.org > at the line "TEST RESULTS" you will find the results for > a sharing test and a burst test. > You will see that both qdisc are good.Nice comparision, very interesting. Note that you have a small misconfiguration in your HFSC setup. On page 8 you say "The shaping is impacted by real time bursts". This is only because your real-time classes are not part of the link-sharing hierarchy. If you add link-share curves to the real-time classes which are equal to the real-time curves shaping won''t be impacted. Regards Patrick _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/