Btrfs devel - Oct 2011 - btrfs-tools source code

It still doesn''t appear to have returned to kernel.org.  Should that 
happen sometime soon, or is it available somewhere else now?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs"
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 01:51:31PM -0400, Phillip Susi
wrote:
> It still doesn''t appear to have returned to kernel.org.  Should
that
> happen sometime soon, or is it available somewhere else now?
   If the wiki was up (which should be coming back to kernel.org in
the next few weeks, I''m told), you''d be able to see that the
latest
version of the tools is actually available from

    http://git.darksatanic.net/repo/btrfs-progs-unstable.git/

If you want something more recent than 6 months old, you will need
either the for-chris branch (considered pretty stable), or the latest
integration branch (which is the very latest bits). Gitweb access for
browsing is at

http://git.darksatanic.net/cgi/gitweb.cgi?p=btrfs-progs-unstable.git;a=summary

   Hugo.

-- 
=== Hugo Mills: hugo@... carfax.org.uk | darksatanic.net | lug.org.uk ==  PGP
key: 515C238D from wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net or http://www.carfax.org.uk
  --- The glass is neither half-full nor half-empty; it is twice as ---  
                        large as it needs to be.

(2011/10/27 3:26), Hugo Mills wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 01:51:31PM -0400, Phillip Susi wrote:
>> It still doesn''t appear to have returned to kernel.org. 
Should that
>> happen sometime soon, or is it available somewhere else now?
> 
>    If the wiki was up (which should be coming back to kernel.org in
> the next few weeks, I''m told), you''d be able to see that
the latest
> version of the tools is actually available from
> 
>     http://git.darksatanic.net/repo/btrfs-progs-unstable.git/
Though the check on the number of args has been changed with the
following patch,

  commit:f71210f87e0c684d8c76dfa2e19ea86256fc3d1f
  check number of args for btrfs sub snap correctly

however, in integration-20111012, I think that returning it to an
original value is correct. 

Thanks,
Tsutomu


diff -urNp a/btrfs_cmds.c b/btrfs_cmds.c
--- a/btrfs_cmds.c	2011-10-12 19:54:48.000000000 +0900
+++ b/btrfs_cmds.c	2011-10-27 09:07:56.000000000 +0900
@@ -394,7 +394,7 @@ int do_clone(int argc, char **argv)
 			return 1;
 		}
 	}
-	if (argc - optind != 3) {
+	if (argc - optind != 2) {
 		fprintf(stderr, "Invalid arguments for subvolume snapshot\n");
 		free(argv);
 		return 1;
> 
> If you want something more recent than 6 months old, you will need
> either the for-chris branch (considered pretty stable), or the latest
> integration branch (which is the very latest bits). Gitweb access for
> browsing is at
> 
>
http://git.darksatanic.net/cgi/gitweb.cgi?p=btrfs-progs-unstable.git;a=summary
> 
>    Hugo.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs"
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html