flight 17624 xen-4.2-testing real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/17624/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64-oldkern 4 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 17611
Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-winxpsp3 7 windows-install fail like 17601
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
build-armhf 4 xen-build fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pcipt-intel 9 guest-start fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-winxpsp3-vcpus1 13 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 13 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 13 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-win7-amd64 13 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64 13 guest-stop fail never pass
test-i386-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 13 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3-vcpus1 13 guest-stop fail never pass
test-i386-i386-xl-winxpsp3 13 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-xend-winxpsp3 16 leak-check/check fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 13 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 13 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-winxpsp3 13 guest-stop fail never pass
test-i386-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3 13 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-xend-qemut-winxpsp3 16 leak-check/check fail never pass
version targeted for testing:
xen e5b9f23485aa3709bec753badbcb989fde390925
baseline version:
xen 0984c2b63a7c3e9dfa770b29dac51a5124aecaab
------------------------------------------------------------
People who touched revisions under test:
Dr. Greg Wettstein <greg@enjellic.com>
Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>
------------------------------------------------------------
jobs:
build-amd64 pass
build-armhf fail
build-i386 pass
build-amd64-oldkern fail
build-i386-oldkern pass
build-amd64-pvops pass
build-i386-pvops pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl pass
test-amd64-i386-xl pass
test-i386-i386-xl pass
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd pass
test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd pass
test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-win7-amd64 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-credit2 pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pcipt-intel fail
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel pass
test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-intel pass
test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-multivcpu pass
test-amd64-amd64-pair pass
test-amd64-i386-pair pass
test-i386-i386-pair pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf-pin pass
test-amd64-amd64-pv pass
test-amd64-i386-pv pass
test-i386-i386-pv pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3-vcpus1 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-winxpsp3-vcpus1 fail
test-amd64-i386-xend-qemut-winxpsp3 fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-winxpsp3 fail
test-i386-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3 fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 fail
test-i386-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 fail
test-amd64-i386-xend-winxpsp3 fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-winxpsp3 fail
test-i386-i386-xl-winxpsp3 fail
------------------------------------------------------------
sg-report-flight on woking.cam.xci-test.com
logs: /home/xc_osstest/logs
images: /home/xc_osstest/images
Logs, config files, etc. are available at
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs
Test harness code can be found at
http://xenbits.xensource.com/gitweb?p=osstest.git;a=summary
Not pushing.
------------------------------------------------------------
commit e5b9f23485aa3709bec753badbcb989fde390925
Author: Dr. Greg Wettstein <greg@wind.enjellic.com>
Date: Tue Mar 19 07:26:33 2013 +0000
tools: Retry blktap2 tapdisk message on interrupt.
Re-start blktap2 IPC select call on interrupt.
We hunted this miserable bug for a long time.
The teardown of a blktap2 tapdisk instance is being carried out
inconsistently up to and including the 4.2.1 release. The
problem appears to be a classic ''Heisenbug'' which
disappears if a
single function call is added to the tapdisk shutdown path. It
is likely this bug has been in existence for the life of the
blktap2 code.
Control messages to manipulate a tapdisk instance are sent over a
UNIX domain socket. A select call is used on both the read and
write paths to wait on I/O and to set a timeout for the
transmission and reception of the control plane messages.
The existing code fails receipt or transmission of the control message
on any type of error return from the select call. The xl control
process receives an interrupt while waiting in the select call which
in turn causes an error return with SIGINT as the return code.
This prematurely terminates the teardown of the tapdisk instance
leaving it in various states of shutdown. Since multiple messages
are needed to implement a full teardown the tapdisk instance can be
left in various states ranging from fully connected to only the minor
being left allocated.
The fix is straight forward. Check the return code from the
select call and re-try read or write of the control message if
errno is sent to EINTR. The problem manifests itself in the read
path but there appears to be little reason to not add the fix to
the write path as well. Both paths appear to be cut-and-paste
copies of each other.
Signed-off-by: Dr. Greg Wettstein <greg@enjellic.com>
Acked-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
(cherry picked from commit 6cffb2b469a55032a2900ccb8776c0082f346758)
commit c70ce4614ea99bc31450141359ec6c5c53a9f7b2
Author: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Date: Tue Apr 9 15:44:07 2013 +0100
libxl: run libxl__arch_domain_create() much earlier.
Among other things, arch_domain_create() sets the shadow(/hap/p2m)
memory allocation, which must happen after vcpus are assigned (or the
shadow op will fail) but before memory is allocated (or we might run
out of p2m memory).
libxl__build_pre(), which already sets similar things like maxmem,
semes like a reasonable spot for it. That needed a bit of plumbing to
get the right datastructure from the caller.
As a side-effect, the return code from libxl__arch_domain_create() is
no longer ignored.
This bug was analysed in:
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>
"Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 16788: regressions -
FAIL"
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 16:34:53 +0000
http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2013-03/msg00191.html
Reported-by: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>
Cc: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
(Cherry-picked from 650354dbc2626b643c12873275ca67782f1382c8.)
Conflicts:
tools/libxl/libxl_dom.c
Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
(qemu changes not included)
