Just wanted to put the word out, if you are interested in running Puppet on Passenger with Ubuntu Hardy, the updated packages can be found @ the BitPusher PPA on Launchpad. https://launchpad.net/~bitpusher/+archive/ppa --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Mark Foster<mark@g.foster.cc> wrote:> Just wanted to put the word out, if you are interested in running Puppet on > Passenger with Ubuntu Hardy, the updated packages can be found @ the > BitPusher PPA on Launchpad. > > https://launchpad.net/~bitpusher/+archive/ppaHow do these compare to the Brightbox packages for Hardy Mark? http://wiki.brightbox.co.uk/docs:phusion-passenger -- Nigel Kersten nigelk@google.com System Administrator Google, Inc. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
On Jul 22, 9:11 am, Nigel Kersten <nig...@google.com> wrote:> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Mark Foster<m...@g.foster.cc> wrote: > > Just wanted to put the word out, if you are interested in running Puppet on > > Passenger with Ubuntu Hardy, the updated packages can be found @ the > > BitPusher PPA on Launchpad. > > >https://launchpad.net/~bitpusher/+archive/ppa > > How do these compare to the Brightbox packages for Hardy Mark? > > http://wiki.brightbox.co.uk/docs:phusion-passenger >I wasn''t aware of their existence and it looks like they''ve got passenger covered pretty good (multiple versions of passenger for both i386 and amd64). However there is no sign of puppet >= 0.24.6 at their repo which is explicitly called out in the UsingPassenger wiki doc, so there is no one-stop shopping there for Hardy. Makes me wonder if they''re eating their own dog food :) How should I know? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Mark Foster<mark@g.foster.cc> wrote:> > > > On Jul 22, 9:11 am, Nigel Kersten <nig...@google.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Mark Foster<m...@g.foster.cc> wrote: >> > Just wanted to put the word out, if you are interested in running Puppet on >> > Passenger with Ubuntu Hardy, the updated packages can be found @ the >> > BitPusher PPA on Launchpad. >> >> >https://launchpad.net/~bitpusher/+archive/ppa >> >> How do these compare to the Brightbox packages for Hardy Mark? >> >> http://wiki.brightbox.co.uk/docs:phusion-passenger >> > > I wasn''t aware of their existence and it looks like they''ve got > passenger covered pretty good (multiple versions of passenger for both > i386 and amd64).> However there is no sign of puppet >= 0.24.6 at their repo which is > explicitly called out in the UsingPassenger wiki doc, so there is no > one-stop shopping there for Hardy. > Makes me wonder if they''re eating their own dog food :) How should I > know?So I had success with their packages on Hardy with puppet 0.24.8, and we''ve just been using upstream Debian puppet 0.24.8, but Hardy looks like it will require a backport going forward.> > > >-- Nigel Kersten nigelk@google.com System Administrator Google, Inc. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
I''ve happily used the Brightbox Hardy packages on two different systems. Quite happy with them, though it''s my first time using Passenger, so I can''t really judge. At least some of the sources are on GitHub, too: http://github.com/johnl/deb-passenger/tree/master Julian. 2009/7/22 Nigel Kersten <nigelk@google.com>:> > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Mark Foster<mark@g.foster.cc> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Jul 22, 9:11 am, Nigel Kersten <nig...@google.com> wrote: >>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Mark Foster<m...@g.foster.cc> wrote: >>> > Just wanted to put the word out, if you are interested in running Puppet on >>> > Passenger with Ubuntu Hardy, the updated packages can be found @ the >>> > BitPusher PPA on Launchpad. >>> >>> >https://launchpad.net/~bitpusher/+archive/ppa >>> >>> How do these compare to the Brightbox packages for Hardy Mark? >>> >>> http://wiki.brightbox.co.uk/docs:phusion-passenger >>> >> >> I wasn''t aware of their existence and it looks like they''ve got >> passenger covered pretty good (multiple versions of passenger for both >> i386 and amd64). > > >> However there is no sign of puppet >= 0.24.6 at their repo which is >> explicitly called out in the UsingPassenger wiki doc, so there is no >> one-stop shopping there for Hardy. >> Makes me wonder if they''re eating their own dog food :) How should I >> know? > > So I had success with their packages on Hardy with puppet 0.24.8, and > we''ve just been using upstream Debian puppet 0.24.8, but Hardy looks > like it will require a backport going forward. > > > >> >> > >> > > > > -- > Nigel Kersten > nigelk@google.com > System Administrator > Google, Inc. > > > >-- Julian Simpson Software Build and Deployment http://www.build-doctor.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---