Gajillion
2009-Jun-03 19:56 UTC
[Puppet Users] does puppet+augeas actually work? limits.conf busticated
All, I''ve tried several lenses and several iterations and have never been able to get augeas and puppet to work together. My latest attempt: augeas {"memlock": changes => [ "ins domain after /files/etc/security/limits.conf/domain [last()]", "set /files/etc/security/limits.conf/domain[last()]/ *", "set /files/etc/security/limits.conf/domain[last()]/type hard", "set /files/etc/security/limits.conf/domain[last()]/item memlock", "set /files/etc/security/limits.conf/domain[last()]/value unlimited", ] } Fails: wombat::setup/Augeas[memlock]/returns: change from need_to_run to 0 failed: Save failed with return code false However, stepping through those exact steps cut and paste into augtool works: augtool> ins domain after /files/etc/security/limits.conf/domain[last ()] augtool> set /files/etc/security/limits.conf/domain[last()]/ * augtool> set /files/etc/security/limits.conf/domain[last()]/type hard augtool> set /files/etc/security/limits.conf/domain[last()]/item memlock augtool> set /files/etc/security/limits.conf/domain[last()]/value unlimited augtool> save Saved 1 file(s) augtool> # tail -1 /etc/security/limits.conf * hard memlock unlimited I can''t see anything even remotely obviously wrong in this. Any ideas? I''ve tried several iterations using various contexts and get the same thing every time. Full failure code from puppet debug: Augeas[memlock](provider=augeas): Opening augeas with root /, lens path , flags 0 debug: Augeas[memlock](provider=augeas): Augeas version 0.5.0 is installed debug: Augeas[memlock](provider=augeas): sending command ''ins'' with params ["domain", "after", "/files/etc/security/limits.conf/domain[last ()]"] debug: Augeas[memlock](provider=augeas): sending command ''set'' with params ["/files/etc/security/limits.conf/domain[last()]/", "*"] debug: Augeas[memlock](provider=augeas): sending command ''set'' with params ["/files/etc/security/limits.conf/domain[last()]/type", "hard"] debug: Augeas[memlock](provider=augeas): sending command ''set'' with params ["/files/etc/security/limits.conf/domain[last()]/item", "memlock"] debug: Augeas[memlock](provider=augeas): sending command ''set'' with params ["/files/etc/security/limits.conf/domain[last()]/value", "unlimited"] err: //Node[...]/wombat::setup/Augeas[memlock]/returns: change from need_to_run to 0 failed: Save failed with return code false --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Rob McBroom
2009-Jun-03 20:25 UTC
[Puppet Users] Re: does puppet+augeas actually work? limits.conf busticated
On 2009-Jun-3, at 3:56 PM, Gajillion wrote:> Fails: wombat::setup/Augeas[memlock]/returns: change from need_to_run > to 0 failed: Save failed with return code falsThis is the same error I just said I wasn''t able to reproduce in another thread. What OS is this? Try installing Augeas itself (not just the libs and ruby bindings) and see if the error goes away. -- Rob McBroom <http://www.skurfer.com/> Don''t try to tell me a thing is important to you if the whole of your "support" entails forcing other to spend time and money on it. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Gajillion
2009-Jun-04 12:53 UTC
[Puppet Users] Re: does puppet+augeas actually work? limits.conf busticated
I have the complete augeas install as well as the ruby libs. That''s how I was able to test that the paths and inserts are valid Augeas commands. The RPMs were pulled from EPEL 4. Just to be clear - it works fine with just Augeas, but fails under Puppet driven Augeas. [root@buildtest tests]# cat /etc/redhat-release Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4 (Nahant Update 6) [root@buildtest tests]# rpm -qa --queryformat "%{NAME}-%{VERSION}-% {RELEASE}.%{ARCH} \\n" | grep aug ruby-augeas-0.2.0-3.el4.x86_64 augeas-libs-0.5.0-2.el4.x86_64 augeas-0.5.0-2.el4.x86_64 [root@buildtest tests]# On Jun 3, 3:25 pm, Rob McBroom <mailingli...@skurfer.com> wrote:> On 2009-Jun-3, at 3:56 PM, Gajillion wrote: > > > Fails: wombat::setup/Augeas[memlock]/returns: change from need_to_run > > to 0 failed: Save failed with return code fals > > This is the same error I just said I wasn''t able to reproduce in > another thread. What OS is this? Try installing Augeas itself (not > just the libs and ruby bindings) and see if the error goes away. > > -- > Rob McBroom > <http://www.skurfer.com/> > > Don''t try to tell me a thing is important to you if the whole of your > "support" entails forcing other to spend time and money on it.--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Bryan Kearney
2009-Jun-04 13:50 UTC
[Puppet Users] Re: does puppet+augeas actually work? limits.conf busticated
Gajillion wrote:> I have the complete augeas install as well as the ruby libs. That''s > how I was able to test that the paths and inserts are valid Augeas > commands. The RPMs were pulled from EPEL 4. Just to be clear - it > works fine with just Augeas, but fails under Puppet driven Augeas. > > [root@buildtest tests]# cat /etc/redhat-release > Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4 (Nahant Update 6) > [root@buildtest tests]# rpm -qa --queryformat "%{NAME}-%{VERSION}-% > {RELEASE}.%{ARCH} \\n" | grep aug > ruby-augeas-0.2.0-3.el4.x86_64 > augeas-libs-0.5.0-2.el4.x86_64 > augeas-0.5.0-2.el4.x86_64 > [root@buildtest tests]# > > > > On Jun 3, 3:25 pm, Rob McBroom <mailingli...@skurfer.com> wrote: >> On 2009-Jun-3, at 3:56 PM, Gajillion wrote: >> >>> Fails: wombat::setup/Augeas[memlock]/returns: change from need_to_run >>> to 0 failed: Save failed with return code fals >> This is the same error I just said I wasn''t able to reproduce in >> another thread. What OS is this? Try installing Augeas itself (not >> just the libs and ruby bindings) and see if the error goes away. >> >> -- >> Rob McBroom >> <http://www.skurfer.com/> >> >> Don''t try to tell me a thing is important to you if the whole of your >> "support" entails forcing other to spend time and money on it. > >What does the file look like before you run this? I get a failure on my machine: http://pastebin.com/m70e190b2 I am using augeas .50 on Fedora 10. -- bk --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Gajillion
2009-Jun-04 13:52 UTC
[Puppet Users] Re: does puppet+augeas actually work? limits.conf busticated
So, a quick question then. I ran a very verbose strace on puppet while it was going through this change. What I see is this. Augeas libs successfully opens and reads in the target file: 26971 access("/etc/security/limits.conf", R_OK) = 0 26971 open("/etc/security/limits.conf", O_RDONLY) = 6 26971 fstat(6, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0640, st_size=2912, ...}) = 0 26971 mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE| MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x2a97621000 26971 read(6, "# $Id: $\n#\n# DEV & QA User Resource Limits\n#\n#Each line describes a limit for a user in the for ... 8192) = 2912 ... It then opens up a backup file I''m assuming it will write its changes to: 26971 read(6, "", 4096) = 0 26971 close(6) = 0 26971 munmap(0x2a97621000, 4096) = 0 26971 open("/etc/security/limits.conf.augnew", O_WRONLY|O_CREAT| O_TRUNC, 0666) = 6 ... It then writes the contents of the old limits.conf to that file (the file length of 2912 is the same in the read above and the write): 26971 lstat("/etc/security/limits.conf", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0640, st_size=2912, ...}) = 0 26971 lchown("/etc/security/limits.conf.augnew", 0, 4) = 0 26971 chmod("/etc/security/limits.conf.augnew", 0100640) = 0 26971 fstat(6, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0640, st_size=0, ...}) = 0 26971 mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE| MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x2a97621000 26971 write(6, "# $Id: $\n#\n# DEV & QA User Resource Limits\n#\n#Each line describes a limit for a user in the form ... 2912 <unfinished ...> But then it goes into some sleep, resumes the write, but never adds anything. 27015 <... nanosleep resumed> {0, 208251453512}) = 0 27015 nanosleep({0, 10000000}, <unfinished ...> 26971 <... write resumed> ) = 2912 26971 fsync(6) = 0 26971 close(6) = 0 26971 munmap(0x2a97621000, 4096) = 0 26971 unlink("/etc/security/limits.conf.augnew") = 0 So I''m not sure what''s happening in that nanosleep, but it appears to be failing and is just returning nothing. On Jun 3, 3:25 pm, Rob McBroom <mailingli...@skurfer.com> wrote:> On 2009-Jun-3, at 3:56 PM, Gajillion wrote: > > > Fails: wombat::setup/Augeas[memlock]/returns: change from need_to_run > > to 0 failed: Save failed with return code fals > > This is the same error I just said I wasn''t able to reproduce in > another thread. What OS is this? Try installing Augeas itself (not > just the libs and ruby bindings) and see if the error goes away. > > -- > Rob McBroom > <http://www.skurfer.com/> > > Don''t try to tell me a thing is important to you if the whole of your > "support" entails forcing other to spend time and money on it.--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Bryan Kearney
2009-Jun-04 13:54 UTC
[Puppet Users] Re: does puppet+augeas actually work? limits.conf busticated
Gajillion wrote:> So, a quick question then. I ran a very verbose strace on puppet > while it was going through this change. What I see is this. > <SNIP LOTS OF LOW LEVEL TRACEY STUFF>You need to differentiate the plugin and augeas. Augeas writes a temp file and then copies it to the final location. Now.. the plugin. The first augeas plugin always ran augeas, which caused the task to fire even if no change was made to the file. We changed this by adding a no-op mode to augeas, and having the plugin do a "test run" of the changes to determine if it needs to run. So.. you are seeing first he test run, and then the actual run. -- bk --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Gajillion
2009-Jun-04 14:12 UTC
[Puppet Users] Re: does puppet+augeas actually work? limits.conf busticated
Yes. I understand that. I posted the portion of the strace from the second run. On the first run, my result code is this: 26971 write(1, "\33[0;37mdebug: Augeas[memlock](provider=augeas): Files changed, should execute\33[0m", 81) = 81 26971 write(1, "\n", 1) = 1 ... 26971 sendto(5, "<31>Jun 4 09:32:46 puppetd[26971]: (Augeas[memlock] (provider=augeas)) Files changed, should execute", 100, MSG_NOSIGNAL, NULL, 0) = 100 So Augeas recognizes that it''s supposed to do something, but on the second run, it doesn''t actually do it and returns a fail code. On Jun 4, 8:54 am, Bryan Kearney <bkear...@redhat.com> wrote:> Gajillion wrote: > > So, a quick question then. I ran a very verbose strace on puppet > > while it was going through this change. What I see is this. > > <SNIP LOTS OF LOW LEVEL TRACEY STUFF> > > You need to differentiate the plugin and augeas. Augeas writes a temp > file and then copies it to the final location. > > Now.. the plugin. The first augeas plugin always ran augeas, which > caused the task to fire even if no change was made to the file. We > changed this by adding a no-op mode to augeas, and having the plugin do > a "test run" of the changes to determine if it needs to run. > > So.. you are seeing first he test run, and then the actual run. > > -- bk--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Gajillion
2009-Jun-04 14:14 UTC
[Puppet Users] Re: does puppet+augeas actually work? limits.conf busticated
Yeah, this assumes you have something already in limits.conf. It will fail if you don''t because augeas fails on the last() call. [root@buildtest security]# tail /etc/security/limits.conf @arcadev hard nproc 8192 @arcadev soft nofile 2048 @arcadev hard nofile 8192 # Arca QA @arcaqa soft nproc 2048 @arcaqa hard nproc 8192 @arcaqa soft nofile 2048 @arcqa hard nofile 8192 On Jun 4, 8:50 am, Bryan Kearney <bkear...@redhat.com> wrote:> Gajillion wrote: > > I have the complete augeas install as well as the ruby libs. That''s > > how I was able to test that the paths and inserts are valid Augeas > > commands. The RPMs were pulled from EPEL 4. Just to be clear - it > > works fine with just Augeas, but fails under Puppet driven Augeas. > > > [root@buildtest tests]# cat /etc/redhat-release > > Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4 (Nahant Update 6) > > [root@buildtest tests]# rpm -qa --queryformat "%{NAME}-%{VERSION}-% > > {RELEASE}.%{ARCH} \\n" | grep aug > > ruby-augeas-0.2.0-3.el4.x86_64 > > augeas-libs-0.5.0-2.el4.x86_64 > > augeas-0.5.0-2.el4.x86_64 > > [root@buildtest tests]# > > > On Jun 3, 3:25 pm, Rob McBroom <mailingli...@skurfer.com> wrote: > >> On 2009-Jun-3, at 3:56 PM, Gajillion wrote: > > >>> Fails: wombat::setup/Augeas[memlock]/returns: change from need_to_run > >>> to 0 failed: Save failed with return code fals > >> This is the same error I just said I wasn''t able to reproduce in > >> another thread. What OS is this? Try installing Augeas itself (not > >> just the libs and ruby bindings) and see if the error goes away. > > >> -- > >> Rob McBroom > >> <http://www.skurfer.com/> > > >> Don''t try to tell me a thing is important to you if the whole of your > >> "support" entails forcing other to spend time and money on it. > > What does the file look like before you run this? I get a failure on my > machine: > > http://pastebin.com/m70e190b2 > > I am using augeas .50 on Fedora 10. > > -- bk--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Gajillion
2009-Jun-04 16:28 UTC
[Puppet Users] Re: does puppet+augeas actually work? limits.conf busticated
For whatever it''s worth, I''ve been able to trace this to put_store (which is being called from create_lens) being called with NULL for state->value. This happens as Augeas is parsing the existing file and gets to the last value. For some reason, it just keeps going. I''m afraid this is as far as I can take it as I don''t understand the state generation that well. [root@buildtest security]# tail -1 /etc/security/limits.conf @arcqa hard nofile 8192 And with some loud debugging code thrown in... calling put_lens in put_store. value : @arcaq Going into subtree (null) calling put_lens in put_store. value : hard Coming out of subtree (null) Going into subtree (null) calling put_lens in put_store. value : nofile Coming out of subtree (null) Going into subtree (null) calling put_lens in put_store. value : 8192 Coming out of subtree (null) Coming out of subtree (null) Before return check in create_lens with error 0 and tag 49 in create_lens with error 0 and tag 49 Before return check in create_lens with error 0 and tag 50 in create_lens with error 0 and tag 50 calling create_lens Before return check in create_lens with error 0 and tag 48 in create_lens with error 0 and tag 48 Before return check in create_lens with error 0 and tag 45 in create_lens with error 0 and tag 45 Before return check in create_lens with error 0 and tag 43 in create_lens with error 0 and tag 43 Calling put_store with error 0 and tag 43 in put_store. value : (null) errored at null value --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
David Lutterkort
2009-Jun-05 00:00 UTC
[Puppet Users] Re: does puppet+augeas actually work? limits.conf busticated
On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 12:56 -0700, Gajillion wrote:> All, > I''ve tried several lenses and several iterations and have never been > able to get augeas and puppet to work together. My latest attempt: > > augeas {"memlock": > changes => [ > "ins domain after /files/etc/security/limits.conf/domain > [last()]", > "set /files/etc/security/limits.conf/domain[last()]/ *",I bet the problem is the trailing ''/'' - Augeas'' XPath syntax doesn''t allow that. The reason this works in augtool is that augtool will be helpful and clean up the path you entered and remove the trailing slash. The Puppet Augeas type does not - but it also does not check the return value of Augeas.set; the next set in your changes creates an domain node with no value, which is what save ultimately chokes on. Clearly, we need better error checking/reporting ... David --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Bryan Kearney
2009-Jun-05 11:05 UTC
[Puppet Users] Re: does puppet+augeas actually work? limits.conf busticated
David Lutterkort wrote:> On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 12:56 -0700, Gajillion wrote: >> All, >> I''ve tried several lenses and several iterations and have never been >> able to get augeas and puppet to work together. My latest attempt: >> >> augeas {"memlock": >> changes => [ >> "ins domain after /files/etc/security/limits.conf/domain >> [last()]", >> "set /files/etc/security/limits.conf/domain[last()]/ *", > > I bet the problem is the trailing ''/'' - Augeas'' XPath syntax doesn''t > allow that. The reason this works in augtool is that augtool will be > helpful and clean up the path you entered and remove the trailing slash. > > The Puppet Augeas type does not - but it also does not check the return > value of Augeas.set; the next set in your changes creates an domain node > with no value, which is what save ultimately chokes on. > > Clearly, we need better error checking/reporting ... >I will put in a ticket. -- bk --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Gajillion
2009-Jun-05 13:02 UTC
[Puppet Users] Re: does puppet+augeas actually work? limits.conf busticated
That didn''t work either: debug: Augeas[memlock](provider=augeas): sending command ''ins'' with params ["domain", "after", "/files/etc/security/limits.conf/files/etc/ security/limits.conf/domain[last()]"] debug: Augeas[memlock](provider=augeas): sending command ''set'' with params ["/files/etc/security/limits.conf/files/etc/security/ limits.conf/domain[last()]", "*"] debug: Augeas[memlock](provider=augeas): sending command ''set'' with params ["/files/etc/security/limits.conf/files/etc/security/ limits.conf/domain[last()]/type", "hard"] debug: Augeas[memlock](provider=augeas): sending command ''set'' with params ["/files/etc/security/limits.conf/files/etc/security/ limits.conf/domain[last()]/item", "memlock"] debug: Augeas[memlock](provider=augeas): sending command ''set'' with params ["/files/etc/security/limits.conf/files/etc/security/ limits.conf/domain[last()]/value", "unlimited"] err: //Node[buildtest]/wombat::setup/Augeas[memlock]/returns: change from need_to_run to 0 failed: Save failed with return code false On Jun 4, 7:00 pm, David Lutterkort <lut...@redhat.com> wrote:> On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 12:56 -0700, Gajillion wrote: > > All, > > I''ve tried several lenses and several iterations and have never been > > able to get augeas and puppet to work together. My latest attempt: > > > augeas {"memlock": > > changes => [ > > "ins domain after /files/etc/security/limits.conf/domain > > [last()]", > > "set /files/etc/security/limits.conf/domain[last()]/ *", > > I bet the problem is the trailing ''/'' - Augeas'' XPath syntax doesn''t > allow that. The reason this works in augtool is that augtool will be > helpful and clean up the path you entered and remove the trailing slash. > > The Puppet Augeas type does not - but it also does not check the return > value of Augeas.set; the next set in your changes creates an domain node > with no value, which is what save ultimately chokes on. > > Clearly, we need better error checking/reporting ... > > David--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
David Lutterkort
2009-Jun-05 17:56 UTC
[Puppet Users] Re: does puppet+augeas actually work? limits.conf busticated
On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 06:02 -0700, Gajillion wrote:> That didn''t work either:And I was so convinced it would ;)> debug: Augeas[memlock](provider=augeas): sending command ''ins'' with > params ["domain", "after", "/files/etc/security/limits.conf/files/etc/ > security/limits.conf/domain[last()]"]Do you have both a context set and use an absolute path in your changes now ? The prefix /files/etc/security/limits.conf is duplicated in the paths - if that still doesn''t fix it, can you send the whole limits.conf file and the augeas resource you use in your manifest ? David --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Gajillion
2009-Jun-05 22:54 UTC
[Puppet Users] Re: does puppet+augeas actually work? limits.conf busticated
Solution! I owe everyone a big thanks and big apology. It turns out that rpm -e ruby doesn''t really rpm -e ruby... Pretty much everything in /usr/lib/ ruby and /usr/lib64/ruby stayed in place when I did that, so when I upgraded ruby and puppet from 0.24.5 to 0.24.8 and ruby from 1.8.1 to 1.8.6, it just overlayed the 1.8.6 files on top of the 1.8.1 instead of removing a bunch of stuff that it should have. In effect, I was really still running puppet 0.24.5 despite the fact that it reported itself as 0.24.8. I removed all the rpms, deleted /usr/lib/ruby and / usr/lib64/ruby and reinstalled and it works as advertised. And David - you were right. It does fail with the trailing slash :) Thanks again, Mark On Jun 5, 12:56 pm, David Lutterkort <lut...@redhat.com> wrote:> On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 06:02 -0700, Gajillion wrote: > > That didn''t work either: > > And I was so convinced it would ;) > > > debug: Augeas[memlock](provider=augeas): sending command ''ins'' with > > params ["domain", "after", "/files/etc/security/limits.conf/files/etc/ > > security/limits.conf/domain[last()]"] > > Do you have both a context set and use an absolute path in your changes > now ? The prefix /files/etc/security/limits.conf is duplicated in the > paths - if that still doesn''t fix it, can you send the whole limits.conf > file and the augeas resource you use in your manifest ? > > David--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Bryan Kearney
2009-Jun-08 01:42 UTC
[Puppet Users] Re: does puppet+augeas actually work? limits.conf busticated
Gajillion wrote:> Solution! > > I owe everyone a big thanks and big apology. It turns out that rpm -e > ruby doesn''t really rpm -e ruby... Pretty much everything in /usr/lib/ > ruby and /usr/lib64/ruby stayed in place when I did that, so when I > upgraded ruby and puppet from 0.24.5 to 0.24.8 and ruby from 1.8.1 to > 1.8.6, it just overlayed the 1.8.6 files on top of the 1.8.1 instead > of removing a bunch of stuff that it should have. In effect, I was > really still running puppet 0.24.5 despite the fact that it reported > itself as 0.24.8. I removed all the rpms, deleted /usr/lib/ruby and / > usr/lib64/ruby and reinstalled and it works as advertised. > > And David - you were right. It does fail with the trailing slash :) >Great... glad to hear it works! -- bk --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---