Hi All, Am new to this list, and have asked in #ovirt / ovirt-users list and they pointed me to here ... I've seen libvirtd using ~11 GB of resident memory after the host has been running for about 60+ days with about 40 VMs running on it. The versions I'm currently running are : libvirt.x86_64 0.9.10-21.el6_3.7 libvirt-client.x86_64 0.9.10-21.el6_3.7 libvirt-lock-sanlock.x86_64 libvirt-python.x86_64 0.9.10-21.el6_3.7 I know I can just restart libvirtd and "all should be fine" (and hopefully I'll regain the 11GB of memory) - however, is there an updated version that maybe fixes a memory leak ?? Thanks in advance, Alex -- | RHCE | Sen Sys Engineer / Platform Architect | www.vcore.co | www.vsearchcloud.com | -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-users/attachments/20130416/e06b3c26/attachment.htm>
On 16.04.2013 10:34, Alex Leonhardt wrote:> Hi All, > > Am new to this list, and have asked in #ovirt / ovirt-users list and > they pointed me to here ... I've seen libvirtd using ~11 GB of resident > memory after the host has been running for about 60+ days with about 40 > VMs running on it. > > The versions I'm currently running are : > > libvirt.x86_64 0.9.10-21.el6_3.7 > libvirt-client.x86_64 0.9.10-21.el6_3.7 > libvirt-lock-sanlock.x86_64 > libvirt-python.x86_64 0.9.10-21.el6_3.7 > > I know I can just restart libvirtd and "all should be fine" (and > hopefully I'll regain the 11GB of memory) - however, is there an updated > version that maybe fixes a memory leak ??Yes. John Ferlan did a great job in hunting memory leaks down. Most of his fixes went to 1.0.3, some into 1.0.4 or even 1.0.2. Michal