> On 15 Jun 2001, Brendan Cully wrote:
>
> > > Out of curiousity, how will the encoder handle this? I mean, if
> > > "-b 128" is specified to oggenc, will the bitrate hover
> > > around ~80kbps (same quality as current encoder) or will it
> > > hover around ~128kbps (with "40% better quality", so to
speak)?
> >
> > I very much hope it does the latter. The former would be very
> > confusing.
>
> For storage, I agree, but I'd prefer it simply lowering the
> bitrate for things like streaming...
Before this gets out of control, I recommend two new
options :
--bitrate <desired bitrate>
--mode <desired mode>
and deprecate the -b option as an experimental/backward
compatibility/mistake/whatever thing. ( also make it print
a big warning, informing the user about the state of things )
Most users would then use --bitrate and get what they expect.
Others ( developers ) can then still select a mode directly
with --mode, if they want to.
The names of this two options could something different off course
( --codebook ? ) and one letter version should also be available.
--
David Balazic
--------------
"Be excellent to each other." - Bill & Ted
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
'vorbis-request@xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is
needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
