Hi Jean-Marc, It was discussed before, when multichannel streams are encoded; taken multiple instances of the encoder where the input is not correlated. Is there a way to pack the result of all channels again? Or maybe do something more efficient in the first place on multichannel streams? Stefan
You question is a bit convoluted and I'm not sure I understand what you're after. But fundamentally, if you have unrelated streams, I don't see what you can really optimise -- regardless of what codec you use. Jean-Marc On 2010-03-06 22:07, Stefan de Konink wrote:> Hi Jean-Marc, > > > It was discussed before, when multichannel streams are encoded; taken > multiple instances of the encoder where the input is not correlated. Is > there a way to pack the result of all channels again? Or maybe do > something more efficient in the first place on multichannel streams? > > > Stefan > _______________________________________________ > celt-dev mailing list > celt-dev at xiph.org > http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/celt-dev > >
Stefan de Konink wrote:> It was discussed before, when multichannel streams are encoded; taken > multiple instances of the encoder where the input is not correlated. Is > there a way to pack the result of all channels again? Or maybe do > something more efficient in the first place on multichannel streams?CELT currently only handles mono and stereo. If you have more than 2 channels you should group them into mono and stereo streams. There is no fancy way to pack the results back together; you can easily do that yourself. --Ben -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/opus/attachments/20100306/5de96c68/attachment-0002.pgp