It might sound stupid, but I'd like to know if there's
any difference. Are those 3 line the same?
WITH_KMS=YES
WITH_KMS="YES"
WITH_KMS=yes
Best regards
Zoran
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Zoran Kolic <zkolic at sbb.rs> wrote:> It might sound stupid, but I'd like to know if there's > any difference. Are those 3 line the same? > > WITH_KMS=YES > WITH_KMS="YES" > WITH_KMS=yesWith regard to their use in /etc/rc.conf, no, absolutely not. In general, from my experience, only the second one will work. This might, or might not, be true for other uses, but rc.conf is pretty picky about this. Kurt
> > WITH_KMS=YES > > WITH_KMS="YES" > > WITH_KMS=yes > > With regard to their use in /etc/rc.conf, no, absolutely not. > In general, from my experience, only the second one will work.Yep, in rc.conf only the second one. I was thinking of make.conf. It is the place kms should be set. Loader conf might take only "" versions also. Thank you and best regards Zoran
On 12 November 2012 00:12, Zoran Kolic <zkolic at sbb.rs> wrote:> It might sound stupid, but I'd like to know if there's > any difference. Are those 3 line the same? > > WITH_KMS=YES > WITH_KMS="YES" > WITH_KMS=yes > > Best regardsIn /etc/make.conf it shouldn't matter: they should all be treated as synonyms for: WITH_KMS -- --