Marcin Slusarz
2012-Oct-07 22:49 UTC
[Nouveau] [PATCH] drm/nouveau: remove >1 sclass support from nouveau_parent_create_
It's unused (only one codepath passes sclass at all and it's always one), broken (overwrites the same field, leaking previous one) and confusing. Signed-off-by: Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz at gmail.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/core/client.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/core/parent.c | 3 +-- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/include/subdev/device.h | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/device/base.c | 6 +++--- 4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/core/client.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/core/client.c index c617f04..87850ec 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/core/client.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/core/client.c @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ nouveau_client_create_(const char *name, u64 devname, const char *cfg, return -ENODEV; ret = nouveau_namedb_create_(NULL, NULL, &nouveau_client_oclass, - NV_CLIENT_CLASS, nouveau_device_sclass, + NV_CLIENT_CLASS, &nouveau_device_sclass, 0, length, pobject); client = *pobject; if (ret) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/core/parent.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/core/parent.c index 0e7733c..1a48e58 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/core/parent.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/core/parent.c @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ nouveau_parent_create_(struct nouveau_object *parent, if (ret) return ret; - while (sclass && sclass->ofuncs) { + if (sclass && sclass->ofuncs) { nclass = kzalloc(sizeof(*nclass), GFP_KERNEL); if (!nclass) return -ENOMEM; @@ -94,7 +94,6 @@ nouveau_parent_create_(struct nouveau_object *parent, object->sclass = nclass; nclass->engine = engine ? nv_engine(engine) : NULL; nclass->oclass = sclass; - sclass++; } object->engine = engcls; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/include/subdev/device.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/include/subdev/device.h index c9e4c4a..0966f33 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/include/subdev/device.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/include/subdev/device.h @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ int nv50_identify(struct nouveau_device *); int nvc0_identify(struct nouveau_device *); int nve0_identify(struct nouveau_device *); -extern struct nouveau_oclass nouveau_device_sclass[]; +extern struct nouveau_oclass nouveau_device_sclass; struct nouveau_device *nouveau_device_find(u64 name); #endif diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/device/base.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/device/base.c index 2cec8a8..352a940 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/device/base.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/device/base.c @@ -409,9 +409,9 @@ nouveau_devobj_ofuncs = { * nouveau_device: engine functions *****************************************************************************/ struct nouveau_oclass -nouveau_device_sclass[] = { - { 0x0080, &nouveau_devobj_ofuncs }, - {} +nouveau_device_sclass = { + .handle = 0x0080, + .ofuncs = &nouveau_devobj_ofuncs, }; static void -- 1.7.12
Ben Skeggs
2012-Oct-08 01:06 UTC
[Nouveau] [PATCH] drm/nouveau: remove >1 sclass support from nouveau_parent_create_
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 12:49:30AM +0200, Marcin Slusarz wrote:> It's unused (only one codepath passes sclass at all and it's always one), > broken (overwrites the same field, leaking previous one) and confusing.It's only *currently* unused, I have WIP code in branches that uses it, otherwise it wouldn't still exist :) I will take a look today at the claims it's broken, it wasn't at some point but may have got busted along the way somehow. Thanks! Ben.> > Signed-off-by: Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz at gmail.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/core/client.c | 2 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/core/parent.c | 3 +-- > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/include/subdev/device.h | 2 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/device/base.c | 6 +++--- > 4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/core/client.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/core/client.c > index c617f04..87850ec 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/core/client.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/core/client.c > @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ nouveau_client_create_(const char *name, u64 devname, const char *cfg, > return -ENODEV; > > ret = nouveau_namedb_create_(NULL, NULL, &nouveau_client_oclass, > - NV_CLIENT_CLASS, nouveau_device_sclass, > + NV_CLIENT_CLASS, &nouveau_device_sclass, > 0, length, pobject); > client = *pobject; > if (ret) > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/core/parent.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/core/parent.c > index 0e7733c..1a48e58 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/core/parent.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/core/parent.c > @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ nouveau_parent_create_(struct nouveau_object *parent, > if (ret) > return ret; > > - while (sclass && sclass->ofuncs) { > + if (sclass && sclass->ofuncs) { > nclass = kzalloc(sizeof(*nclass), GFP_KERNEL); > if (!nclass) > return -ENOMEM; > @@ -94,7 +94,6 @@ nouveau_parent_create_(struct nouveau_object *parent, > object->sclass = nclass; > nclass->engine = engine ? nv_engine(engine) : NULL; > nclass->oclass = sclass; > - sclass++; > } > > object->engine = engcls; > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/include/subdev/device.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/include/subdev/device.h > index c9e4c4a..0966f33 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/include/subdev/device.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/include/subdev/device.h > @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ int nv50_identify(struct nouveau_device *); > int nvc0_identify(struct nouveau_device *); > int nve0_identify(struct nouveau_device *); > > -extern struct nouveau_oclass nouveau_device_sclass[]; > +extern struct nouveau_oclass nouveau_device_sclass; > struct nouveau_device *nouveau_device_find(u64 name); > > #endif > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/device/base.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/device/base.c > index 2cec8a8..352a940 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/device/base.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/device/base.c > @@ -409,9 +409,9 @@ nouveau_devobj_ofuncs = { > * nouveau_device: engine functions > *****************************************************************************/ > struct nouveau_oclass > -nouveau_device_sclass[] = { > - { 0x0080, &nouveau_devobj_ofuncs }, > - {} > +nouveau_device_sclass = { > + .handle = 0x0080, > + .ofuncs = &nouveau_devobj_ofuncs, > }; > > static void > -- > 1.7.12 > > _______________________________________________ > Nouveau mailing list > Nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
Seemingly Similar Threads
- [PATCH] drm/nouveau: fix error handling in core/core object creation functions
- [PATCH 1/2] drm/nouveau: replace ffsll with __ffs64
- [RFC 03/16] drm/nouveau: add platform device probing function
- [PATCH] drm/nouveau: support for platform devices
- [PATCH] drm/nouveau: comment out unused _nouveau_parent_ctor