>>>>> "GaGr" == Gabor Grothendieck <ggrothendieck at
gmail.com>
>>>>> on Sun, 20 Jul 2008 19:51:50 -0400 writes:
GaGr> Is this a true problem?
No;
as Oholoh mentions there are only two files which mention the
artistic licence, namely src/main/apse.[ch]
and these two contain
>> Copyright (C) by Jarkko Hietaniemi, 1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2006.
>> All Rights Reserved.
>>
>> This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> it under the terms of either:
>>
>> a) the GNU Library General Public License as published by the Free
>> Software Foundation; either version 2, or (at your option) any
>> later version, or
>>
>> b) the "Artistic License" which comes with Perl source code.
so they are exactly from the group mentioned below as
"the code in question may be available under multiple licenses"
Thank you, Gabor, for asking.
Martin Maechler
ETH Zurich and R Core Team
GaGr> Artistic License may conflict
GaGr> with GPL The source code for R contains references to
GaGr> both the GNU General Public License 2.0 (GPL) and to
GaGr> the Artistic License. These two licenses include some
GaGr> contradictory restrictions.
GaGr> The Ohloh source code parser is exhaustive, and can
GaGr> reveal licensing requirements which the developers
GaGr> themselves may have overlooked or forgotten.
GaGr> This message is merely a warning. There may not
GaGr> actually be any conflict, because the two licenses may
GaGr> not apply to the exact same sections of code or the
GaGr> code in question may be available under multiple
GaGr> licenses. You should review the license requirements
GaGr> for this project carefully, especially if you are
GaGr> using this code for commercial purposes.
GaGr> The GNU Project maintains a guide to GPL compatibility
GaGr> at their web site.
GaGr> Above is at this page:
GaGr> http://www.ohloh.net/projects/3926/factoids/632981
GaGr> ______________________________________________
GaGr> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
GaGr> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel