Jacob,
That's entirely possible. I am doing the exact same thing. (Printserver
w/temporary unregulated filespace)
Here's the smb.conf I am using on that PC.
[global]
workgroup = RESOURCES
netbios name = PASSPORT
server string = Printer and Temp Server (%v)
security = SHARE
log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log
max log size = 200
os level = 128
preferred master = False
domain master = True
dns proxy = No
wins server = 172.17.10.225
guest account = samba
printer admin = samba
[printers]
comment = All Printers
path = /var/spool/samba
guest ok = Yes
printable = Yes
browseable = No
[print$]
path = /home/samba/printers
write list = samba
guest ok = Yes
[temp]
comment = Shared Temporary Filespace
path = /home/samba/temp
read only = No
guest only = Yes
guest ok = Yes
[stuff]
comment = IT Temporary Filespace
path = /home/samba/stuff
read only = No
guest only = Yes
guest ok = Yes
browseable = No
The [temp] share is the temporary filespace and the [stuff] share is a
hidden mount used by IT.
Regards,
Alan B. Moote
Systems Administrator
MARK IV Industries
tel: 905.624.7908
fax: 905.625.6197
"Jacob Vennervald
Madsen" To:
<samba@samba.org>
<jvm@gopinocchio. cc:
com> Subject: [Samba] Anonymous
access to samba server
Sent by:
samba-admin@lists
.samba.org
03/21/02 03:18 AM
Hi List
I've set up a samba server as file- and printserver.
I wan't it allow anonymous access to these to shares so you don't have
to log in with username and password.
Is that possible?
Jacob
> -----Original Message-----
> From: wolfgang.glas@ev-i.at [mailto:wolfgang.glas@ev-i.at]
> Sent: 21. marts 2002 09:12
> To: samba@samba.org
> Subject: [Samba] locking/seek Problems with SuSE-7.3 / samba-2.2.3a
>
>
> Dear samba team,
>
> This problem report is the same as outlined by Wolfgang Hertz in
>
> http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/2002-January/064507.html
>
> His report has been left without reply, so I to post the
> problem again
> with a more detailed description of our configuration and what we've
> already unsuccessfully tried to overcome the problem.
>
> Our server is configured like follows:
>
> IBM xSeries server using hardware raid (driver: aic7xxx)
> Netgear GA621 1Gbit fiberchannel network card (driver: ns83820)
>
> SuSE-7.3
> kernel-2.4.16 (kernel upgrade from SuSE ftp server; default
> kernel without
> 64 GB memory support)
> PIII/1. 2 GHz/1GB physical memory
> lvm-1.0.1rc4
> samba-2.2.1a (using oplocks / kernel oplocks)
>
> Recently switched to a self-compiled samba-2.2.3a.
>
> The Clients are Windows/2000/Windows XP stations. All Clients are
> connected via a 1GBit->8x100MBit/s switch, so we could
> theoretically reach
> full 100MBit/s for a single client.
>
> Our shares are using ext3-filesystems, the home partition, which is
> exported via samba has a size of 70GB and all problem
> reported are prblems
> with this share, because it makes over 90% of the samba usage.
> We have all the samba oplocks etc. switches set to their
> default values.
>
> Our log file look essentially like the following and we
> experienced no
> difference between samba-2.2.1a and samba-2.2.3a:
>
> [2002/03/20 21:55:56, 0]
> smbd/oplock_linux.c:linux_release_kernel_oplock(209)
> release_kernel_oplock: Error when removing kernel oplock on file
> feap/LD_Pruefung/Berichte/LD2/9543-LD2_T06_Anlage.fm, dev > 3a05, inode
> 2883853, file_id = 824. Error was Bad file descriptor
> [2002/03/20 21:56:07, 0]
> smbd/oplock_linux.c:linux_release_kernel_oplock(209)
> release_kernel_oplock: Error when removing kernel oplock on file
> feap/LD_Pruefung/Berichte/LD3/9543-LD3_T06_Anlage.fm, dev > 3a05, inode
> 2031647, file_id = 879. Error was Bad file descriptor
> [2002/03/20 21:56:23, 0]
> smbd/oplock_linux.c:linux_release_kernel_oplock(209)
> release_kernel_oplock: Error when removing kernel oplock on file
> feap/LD_Pruefung/Berichte/LD5/9543-LD5_T06_Anlage.fm, dev > 3a05, inode
> 1982502, file_id = 934. Error was Bad file descriptor
> [2002/03/20 21:57:12, 0]
> smbd/oplock_linux.c:linux_release_kernel_oplock(209)
> release_kernel_oplock: Error when removing kernel oplock on file
> SV/7000/7508-Prinz_Eugen_Bruecke/7508-SV-Stadt_Plan.fm, dev > 3a05,
inode
> = 1114188, file_id = 954. Error was Bad file descriptor
> [2002/03/20 22:02:55, 0]
> smbd/oplock_linux.c:linux_release_kernel_oplock(209)
> release_kernel_oplock: Error when removing kernel oplock on file
> feap/LD_Pruefung/Berichte/LD_Fotos_ps/9543-LD6_T06_Fotos-2_3.p
> s, dev > 3a05, inode = 2687035, file_id = 1032. Error was Bad file
descriptor
> [2002/03/20 23:08:31, 0] smbd/fileio.c:seek_file(53)
> seek_file: sys_lseek failed. Error was Bad file descriptor
> [2002/03/20 23:08:31, 0] smbd/fileio.c:seek_file(53)
> seek_file: sys_lseek failed. Error was Bad file descriptor
> [2002/03/20 23:08:31, 0] smbd/fileio.c:seek_file(53)
> seek_file: sys_lseek failed. Error was Bad file descriptor
> [2002/03/20 23:08:31, 0] smbd/fileio.c:seek_file(53)
> seek_file: sys_lseek failed. Error was Bad file descriptor
>
> So, we have two problems:
>
> The oplock break messages, which don't seem to hurt us, but
> what really
> bothers me is the lseek error,
> which occur somehow randomly and lets windows Application starve with
> messages like 'The data in the file is corrupt' etc...
>
> My user and I got the impression, that this error occurrs,
> when loading a
> file for the first time, so somehow this may be an oplock problem,
> i.e. the application tries to seek in a file during the file
> is loaded
> into the clients cache using the oplock mechanism......
>
> So thanks for any comments or help,
>
> Regards,
>
> Wolfgang
>
> --
> Dr. Wolfgang Glas EV-i Informationstechnologie
> GmbH.
> Gesch?ftsf?hrer Sebastian-Kneipp-Weg 17
> Wolfgang.Glas@ev-i.at A-6020 Innsbruck/Austria
> phone: ++43-512-284883-2 fax: ++43-512-281624-31
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba