Hi Matt,
Sorry I didn't write earlier, hopefully my suggestions are still useful.
Also, I'm not subscribed to the rsync list so I might duplicate or conflict
with other suggestions you've received. :)
The first suggestion is that the order of the options listed be changed so
that the least esoteric ones are placed before (as much as the grouping
allows) the more often used ones. For example, some of the more often used
groups are "Source File Selection", "Deletion", and
"Name-based filter rules"
I like the way a default action is included in the short option descriptions.
Perhaps -H should be under "Destination file handling" rather
than "Attributes"->"Others"?
In "HOW RSYNC WORKS" the server might be on the local computer. :)
"If the check passes, the generator applies" -> "If
the quick check
passes, the generator applies" . Might as well use the bolded phrase
again! (I think "quick check" is not very descriptive. "file
data sameness
check", "file sameness check", or "sameness check" seem
more informative).
For the part starting "For each regular file, it compares", here is
a
rephrasing:
"For each regular file, it compares the information specified by the
"quick
check" rule to determine whether the file's data are identical. If the
information match, then files are assumed to be the same and the generator
applies any preserved source attributes to the destination file (tweaks
it)."
I think the description of how rsync works is nice and, if nothing else, this
should be added to the existing man page.
Thanks Matt,
C.
On Saturday 04 August 2007 19:26, Matt McCutchen wrote:> Dear Wayne, C Sights, and list,
>
> I have started working on my rewritten version of the rsync man page.
> So far, I have redone the top of the man page and the list of options;
> I improved many of the one-line option descriptions. The yodl and man
> versions of my man page are available here and here:
>
> http://www.kepreon.com/~matt/private/rsync-new-manpage/rsync.yo
> http://www.kepreon.com/~matt/private/rsync-new-manpage/rsync.1
>
> What do you all think so far? Am I going in the right direction?
>
> Matt