when i go into the kde controll panel... it tells me i have an i686 (its a 686/166MHz machine) so, my question is... should i be using the i386 build, or the i686 build??? as i have been using the i386 build, and I am having problems with acessing the windows registry... i have also tried wine on a cel700, with the i386 build, and i get the same problems... so should i be using the i686 build???? thanks for any help... im really keen to get wine working... even after it has trashed by fat partitions :(
GRIFFIN RANGER <griffinranger@aol.com> wrote:> when i go into the kde controll panel... it tells me i have an i686 (its a > 686/166MHz machine)> so, my question is... should i be using the i386 build, or the i686 build???Doesn't matter at all, I'd say.> as i have been using the i386 build, and I am having problems with acessing the > windows registry... i have also tried wine on a cel700, with the i386 build, > and i get the same problems... so should i be using the i686 build????I don't think that problems with accessing the windows registry have anything to do with the build ;-) Check your registry path settings in ~/.wine/config> thanks for any help... im really keen to get wine working... even after it has > trashed by fat partitions :(Well, some people would go as far as saying that people who don't read README files deserve that ;-) (I guess that's a nice heads up for paying attention to READMEs in the future :) "Trashed" is the wrong term, BTW. You simply need to rename some directories back to what they used to be. And it's NOT Wine's fault anyway. -- Andreas Mohr, Renningen, Germany In case you need to contact me after expiry of temporary email address: my real address is (initial of first name).(last name)@mailto.de
intel (and intel compatible) cpus are backwards compatible. ie, the i386 build should run fine even if you have a pentium 4 On 05 Aug 2001 13:36:21 GMT griffinranger@aol.com (GRIFFIN RANGER) wrote:> when i go into the kde controll panel... it tells me i have an i686 (its a > 686/166MHz machine) > > so, my question is... should i be using the i386 build, or the i686 build??? > > as i have been using the i386 build, and I am having problems with acessing the > windows registry... i have also tried wine on a cel700, with the i386 build, > and i get the same problems... so should i be using the i686 build???? > > thanks for any help... im really keen to get wine working... even after it has > trashed by fat partitions :( > _______________________________________________ > wine-users mailing list > wine-users@winehq.com > http://www.winehq.com/mailman/listinfo/wine-users >
Possibly Parallel Threads
- hard drive info
- namespaces/virtual folder & archiving
- NX problems with centos 4.4
- [PATCH v8 00/18] Add support for FDMA DMA controller and slim core rproc found on STi chipsets
- [PATCH v8 00/18] Add support for FDMA DMA controller and slim core rproc found on STi chipsets