I just want to say that I really, really, appreciate the information given on this site: http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa/calendar -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB at Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3
--On Monday, June 13, 2011 10:23:54 AM -0400 "James B. Byrne" <byrnejb at harte-lyne.ca> wrote:> I just want to say that I really, really, appreciate the information > given on this site: > > http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa/calendarIndeed. Even though it's not official, having a gut feel for approximate status sure helps. (I'm another one of those who has been delaying deployment of some new systems pending CentOS 6 due to wanting to maximize those systems' useful lifetimes.) My thanks to the CentOS team for all their hard work. Devin
on 6/13/2011 7:23 AM James B. Byrne spake the following:> > I just want to say that I really, really, appreciate the information > given on this site: > > http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa/calendar >What I appreciate is the lack of fighting and "Is it done yet?" posts that were flowing out before...
On 13 June 2011 23:53, James B. Byrne <byrnejb at harte-lyne.ca> wrote:> > I just want to say that I really, really, appreciate the information > given on this site: > > http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa/calendar > >It seems every time I look at that site the dates have changed, last time I looked the external mirrors where to start syncing yesterday. the 13th -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110614/3eb2da01/attachment-0002.html>
Mark Bradbury wrote:> On 13 June 2011 23:53, James B. Byrne <byrnejb at harte-lyne.ca > <mailto:byrnejb at harte-lyne.ca>> wrote: > > > I just want to say that I really, really, appreciate the information > given on this site: > > http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa/calendar > > > > It seems every time I look at that site the dates have changed, last > time I looked the external mirrors where to start syncing yesterday. the > 13thyes cool isn't it, that webpage is updated! actually that's what makes it useful. besides, read the title text on that page again: "QA dates are tentative dates for internal planning only. These are not official release dates, but only a guide for the QA team. All target dates are subject to change."
On 14/06/2011 05:07, Mark Bradbury wrote:> On 13 June 2011 23:53, James B. Byrne<byrnejb at harte-lyne.ca> wrote: > >> >> I just want to say that I really, really, appreciate the information >> given on this site: >> >> http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa/calendar >> >> > > It seems every time I look at that site the dates have changed, last time I > looked the external mirrors where to start syncing yesterday. the 13th > > > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centosThen 21st, now 24th. Scientific Linux doesn't seem to have these problems. That's why I switched. Don't get it. gvim
On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 13:37 +0930, Mark Bradbury wrote:> On 13 June 2011 23:53, James B. Byrne <byrnejb at harte-lyne.ca> wrote: > > I just want to say that I really, really, appreciate the > information > given on this site: > > http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa/calendar > > > > It seems every time I look at that site the dates have changed, last > time I looked the external mirrors where to start syncing yesterday. > the 13th---- what's the difference? It's already obsoleted by the .1 release. Craig -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.