only FYI:
http://osnews.com/story/24760/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux_6_1_Released
--
CL Martinez
carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com
On Thu, 19 May 2011, carlopmart wrote:> Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux_6_1_Releasedand look at all the anaconda related, and other fixes, that should have been in a dot zero release ... gee -- Russ herrold
On Thursday, May 19, 2011 10:59:45 AM Les Mikesell wrote:> Everyone expected [dot-zero bugfest] from Red Hat before the 'EL' versions when > publishing a free CD of community work was the way QA was done. (And if > you've forgotten, go dig through some changelogs of that era to see just > how bad things were and how much we gained from that process). But > wasn't closing the process and letting 'experts' do that before shipping > supposed to have improved things?Sounds like a question for rhelv6-list at redhat.com
> If you deferred releasing a 6.0 and instead immediately started working on > 6.1, how much additional time would that add to getting 6.1 out? I'm not so > much asking for an actual estimate, as I am whether it would be easier just > to go directly to 6.1 if it fixes any issues that make building the release > easier.An .1 release is basically a .0 release + patches so I don't see any real difference. The hard part is reverse engineering the .0 release build environment and the .1 follows pretty quick from there. Occasionally a .x release breaks the environment and you get situations like 5.6 was. Just my $0.02 form trolling the lists the last few years. :-) -- Drew Waiting patiently for 6.x so he can try out KVM stuff without having to do a from scratch reinstall.