Bernhard Gschaider
2009-Oct-20 18:51 UTC
[CentOS] Upgrade to 5.4 with an existing XFS-filesystem
Hi! I've got a fileserver currently running under 5.3 with the /home-partition being an XFS-filesystem. I use the kmod-xfs from extras. It works great ;) Now: as I understand it from the release-notes the 5.4 kernel has XFS already built-in. Right? Or is it just a kmod-package ("technology preview") Now my question is: are there any recommendations for an upgrade-procedure? I mean, I can probably manage, but I'll want to minimize downtime Bernhard BTW: when doing "yum list updates" I don't see any "kernel*"-packages in the list. Is this because the last kernel from the 5.3-updates has the same build-numer (164 I think)? And is the 5.4-base-kernel the same as the latest 5.3-updates-kernel? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 188 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20091020/66e92a58/attachment-0002.sig>
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Bernhard Gschaider <bgschaid_lists at ice-sf.at> wrote:> I've got a fileserver currently running under 5.3 with the > /home-partition being an XFS-filesystem. I use the kmod-xfs from > extras. It works great ;) > > Now: as I understand it from the release-notes the 5.4 kernel has XFS > already built-in. Right? Or is it just a kmod-package ("technology > preview") > > Now my question is: are there any recommendations for an > upgrade-procedure? I mean, I can probably manage, but I'll want to > minimize downtime> BTW: when doing "yum list updates" I don't see any "kernel*"-packages > in the list. Is this because the last kernel from the 5.3-updates has > the same build-numer (164 I think)? And is the 5.4-base-kernel the > same as the latest 5.3-updates-kernel?The -164 kernel is indeed from 5.4 and has xfs as a built-in kernel module. If you are already running this kernel, that indicates all is well and no further action is needed. Could you show us the output returned by: ls -l `find /lib/modules -name xfs.ko` Akemi
Possibly Parallel Threads
- XFS-filesystem corrupted by defragmentation Was: Performance problems with XFS on Centos 5.4
- Preventing hour-long fsck on ext3-filesystem
- Performance problems with XFS on Centos 5.4
- Problem with evolution while upgrading to CentOS 5.2
- virt-manager crashes Host during installation of guest