Building zaptel-1.4 from today's svn against kernel 2.6.25-git2: ............ Building modules, stage 2. MODPOST 13 modules WARNING: modpost: Found 1 section mismatch(es). ........ The other warnings were about "BIT" redefined, which I assume are benign. Should I worry? If so, what do I do? sean
Kevin P. Fleming
2008-Feb-18 15:16 UTC
[asterisk-users] zaptel: modpost section mismatch ?
sean darcy wrote:> Should I worry? If so, what do I do?We don't normally support Zaptel building against unreleased kernels, because they have a habit of changing before getting to release state, and in the past this has caused us to have to change Zaptel more than once during a kernel release cycle. Once kernel 2.6.25 has been released, we'll fix up Zaptel to accommodate any changes required. -- Kevin P. Fleming Director of Software Technologies Digium, Inc. - "The Genuine Asterisk Experience" (TM)
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 12:07:39PM -0500, sean darcy wrote:> Building zaptel-1.4 from today's svn against kernel 2.6.25-git2:What version is that, exactly? zaptel includes a script to build vs. any specific tag from Linus' git repo. What tag is it?> > ............ > Building modules, stage 2. > MODPOST 13 modules > WARNING: modpost: Found 1 section mismatch(es). > ........I got a slightly similar error, though I don't understand what has caused it.> > The other warnings were about "BIT" redefined, which I assume are benign.BIT should be fixed soon (yeah, I know, it makes a lot of noise). There was another warning in that area regarding sysfs. I'm aware of it as well. -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755 jabber:tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com +972-50-7952406 mailto:tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com http://www.xorcom.com iax:guest at local.xorcom.com/tzafrir