I've been looking through the logs of a system trying to figure out why it sometimes starts extra asterisk processes. In the logs I keep seeing Apr 4 15:22:18 WARNING[5054] chan_zap.c: Can't fix up channel from 1 to 2 because 2 is already in use Apr 4 15:22:18 WARNING[5054] chan_zap.c: Unable to move channel 2! Apr 4 15:22:55 WARNING[5054] chan_zap.c: Can't fix up channel from 1 to 4 because 4 is already in use Apr 4 15:22:55 WARNING[5054] chan_zap.c: Unable to move channel 4! Apr 4 15:26:49 WARNING[5054] chan_zap.c: Call specified, but not found? Apr 4 15:26:49 WARNING[5054] chan_zap.c: Unable to move channel 1! Apr 4 15:26:53 WARNING[5054] chan_zap.c: Call specified, but not found? Apr 4 15:26:53 WARNING[5054] chan_zap.c: Unable to move channel 2! Does this indicate a PRI problem? I am running with a TE110P card and I have identical systems running that don't have this problem. Regards Lee ########################################### This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft Exchange. For more information, connect to http://www.f-secure.com/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060404/31de6da8/attachment.htm
On Tuesday 04 April 2006 10:39, Lee Archer wrote:> I've been looking through the logs of a system trying to figure out why > it sometimes starts extra asterisk processes. In the logs I keep seeingDefine "starts extra asterisk processes."> Apr 4 15:22:18 WARNING[5054] chan_zap.c: Can't fix up channel from 1 to > 2 because 2 is already in use > Apr 4 15:22:18 WARNING[5054] chan_zap.c: Unable to move channel 2! > Apr 4 15:22:55 WARNING[5054] chan_zap.c: Can't fix up channel from 1 to > 4 because 4 is already in useThis sounds like the telco is trying to specify which B channel to use. My understanding is that Asterisk does not currently support this. Asterisk chooses the B channel for outgoing calls. Did it ever work, or is this a new problem? -A.
Inbound and outbound calls seem to work fine, but I noticed this due to trying to figure out why these extra asterisk process as being started. When the system was running * 1.0.10 I did notice that after a while channels 1 and 2 would stop receiving and making calls. The PRI is with BT and on the other systems the PRI is also with BT and they don't have this problem. Regards Lee -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Andrew Kohlsmith Sent: 04 April 2006 15:58 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Possible PRI fault? On Tuesday 04 April 2006 10:39, Lee Archer wrote:> I've been looking through the logs of a system trying to figure out > why it sometimes starts extra asterisk processes. In the logs I keep > seeingDefine "starts extra asterisk processes."> Apr 4 15:22:18 WARNING[5054] chan_zap.c: Can't fix up channel from 1 > to > 2 because 2 is already in use > Apr 4 15:22:18 WARNING[5054] chan_zap.c: Unable to move channel 2! > Apr 4 15:22:55 WARNING[5054] chan_zap.c: Can't fix up channel from 1 > to > 4 because 4 is already in useThis sounds like the telco is trying to specify which B channel to use. My understanding is that Asterisk does not currently support this. Asterisk chooses the B channel for outgoing calls. Did it ever work, or is this a new problem? -A. _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ########################################### This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft Exchange. For more information, connect to http://www.f-secure.com/